For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
memphiscats
I love this song too...I get bummed when I hear people disparage Bridges...I think it's got some great tracks on it - yeah maybe I agree with Bill German that it's almost like 2 separate albums - one that's Mick's and the other Keith's = but I love it just the same
You'll never make a saint outta me...
Quote
Doxa
, the result can be as horrible as "Mighty Get Juiced" (or how it s called): supposedly Keith's boring trad blues riff married with Mick's half-baked idea to make it more inersting by contempoaory mix. Simply awful. I think probably their worst sounding piece of music ever.
- Doxa
Quote
windmelody
Juiced worked rather well during its only live performance in NYC. Bridges is not a classic, but at least they tried out new ideas and performed new songs during the 97-99 tour. OOC was a highlight of these concerts, it could have become a warhorse if the Stones had not decided to become a nostalgia act in 2202.
Quote
windmelody
Sorry, I will edit the post.
Quote
Justin
A great track from a great album.
Quote
StonesTodQuote
Doxa
, the result can be as horrible as "Mighty Get Juiced" (or how it s called): supposedly Keith's boring trad blues riff married with Mick's half-baked idea to make it more inersting by contempoaory mix. Simply awful. I think probably their worst sounding piece of music ever.
- Doxa
and for others like me, by far the best song on an otherwise uneven and ultimately forgettable album...
Quote
Doxa
You see, I just don't like the song...
- Doxa
Quote
StonesTodQuote
Doxa
You see, I just don't like the song...
- Doxa
yeah. i got that from your first post. i'm a quick study.
Quote
DoxaQuote
StonesTodQuote
Doxa
You see, I just don't like the song...
- Doxa
yeah. i got that from your first post. i'm a quick study.
Hmmm... I'm not that convinced that you really got it yet.. I need to think for awhile some further points, metaphors, analogies, refuted counter-examples, etc. to prove I am not joking here...
- Doxa
Quote
Doxa
The idea of closing a Stones album with two slow Keith numbers is such a terrible idea in the first place. No matter how wonderful "How Can I Stop" is, when the song finally stops one one has lot the idea that it actually is a Rolling Stones album...
Quote
Doxa
What the album shows is that both Mick and Keith seem to write better material when they are not consciously doing that for the Rolling Stones in their mind. And when they do, even collaborate, the result can be as horrible as "Mighty Get Juiced" (or how it s called): supposedly Keith's boring trad blues riff married with Mick's half-baked idea to make it more inersting by contempoaory mix. Simply awful. I think probably their worst sounding piece of music ever.
yeah, it could be very well that any Rolling Stones record with two tracks and over ten minutes wihout that particulal instrument of theirs, Mick Jagger's voice, starts to make me feel that I've been cheated. Yeah, unique decision true - and that of having three Keith leaad vocals numbers in one record, as well. Yes, I can be very old-fashionable in that sense that I don't consider Keith Richards as the other lead vocalist of the Stones next to Mick Jagger, but a main guitarist who occasionally takes the microphone to sing lead. What used to be a great extra - Keith's solo song - now seems to developed to habit of its own, and taking a huge part of the band's repertuare, almost dividing it. Well, at least if we listen BRIDGES TO BABYLON. I think the compromise nature of that particular album consisting of two solo albums really hurts the balance and dynamics of the Stones. Its an oddity.Quote
WeLoveToPlayTheBluesQuote
Doxa
The idea of closing a Stones album with two slow Keith numbers is such a terrible idea in the first place. No matter how wonderful "How Can I Stop" is, when the song finally stops one one has lot the idea that it actually is a Rolling Stones album...
This shows that you are a tad too rigid in your set thoughts of what a Rolling Stones album should sound like. It's genius. It works. And the only way it works is because of the two tracks being what they are, of course. Who knows what other Keith songs were done that they didn't use. What really cracks me up is here they were, three years plus after recording Voodoo Lounge and Keith pulls this one out? Don Was' attempt at making Voodoo sound 'retro' did not work at all yet Keith does this kind of, what, 1940s soul jazz song or whatever you want to call it, and it's more 'retro' in spirit, simply by being that kind of song, than anything on Voodoo was in theory.
Quote
sonyzzz
I love this song so much
Quote
Doxa
I think probably their worst sounding piece of music
Quote
Rolling HansieQuote
Doxa
I think probably their worst sounding piece of music
Maybe you think too much
Quote
Doxa
I have to think about it
Quote
Rolling HansieQuote
Doxa
I have to think about it
LOL no, please don't
Quote
Doxa
Your point about the "retro" is a good one. The retro for Don Was or Mick Jagger means something like trying to sound like an old Stones a'la EXILE, but for Keith it means going to more authentic sphere perhaps not much covered yet by him. In this sense he reminds me of 'modern' Dylan.
Quote
DoxaQuote
Rolling HansieQuote
Doxa
I have to think about it
LOL no, please don't
No, I won't but I reformulated it for you:
"probably their worst sounding piece of music" =
"supposedly piece of music that the least resembles the wonderful, authentic, definitive music by The Rolling Stones"
Does that sound any better?
- Doxa
Quote
Doxa
Does that sound any better?
Quote
Stoneage
I'm sorry, but I think Keith's ballads simply are boring.