Quote
Natlanta
so this is how huffpo jacks up their hits? soft porn? and all this time i thought it was the, uh, quality of their political analysis.

so a young lady takes her clothes off...an on line site carries it and it's soft porn?...nudity=soft porn...that's a leap in one's mind that can suggests all sorts of deficiencies not to mention a lack of tolerance.

Wow, lots of negative comments from a bunch of middle aged guys that would send people running away in horror (or bursting out in laughter) if they were ever seen nude!

She's obviously confident, open -minded and adventurous. Good for her.

If she is going to be a model, I would prefer she has her natural brunette hair and her tits are much too small in relation to her body.

A Little T and A, as Dad would say.

Quote
Rip This

Quote
Natlanta
so this is how huffpo jacks up their hits? soft porn? and all this time i thought it was the, uh, quality of their political analysis.

so a young lady takes her clothes off...an on line site carries it and it's soft porn?...nudity=soft porn...that's a leap in one's mind that can suggests all sorts of deficiencies not to mention a lack of tolerance.

well, the original post was primarily about my confusion re huffpo content, but since you insist on picking nits, yes that's apparently considered to be soft porn:

[en.wikipedia.org]

and fyi from this example you may not be so good at reading minds.

...



Edited 7 time(s). Last edit at 2010-06-30 10:38 by straycat58.

she is hot .never mind the boobs that say she should get implants.then what she will look like is some porn chick in chatsworth (porn valley)

Hey Monkeytonkman! Great comment!
Thanks for saying that,finally, a guy with a brain!
I was just thinkin'... these guys always talk about women like they should be perfect, "wheres her round but, wheres her full breasts..." really!?
Are those men that are making those remarks the most perfect men with Greek god bodies and amazing 10inch cocks?
Come on. Get over yourselves.
So what, she posed, and she might not be what some of you want, but before you comment, just stand in front of the mirror first, and if you can say you are perfect then go for the comment, but not without showing us your "nekid" self first!!!

Quote
Mickschick
Hey Monkeytonkman! Great comment!
Thanks for saying that,finally, a guy with a brain!
I was just thinkin'... these guys always talk about women like they should be perfect, "wheres her round but, wheres her full breasts..." really!?
Are those men that are making those remarks the most perfect men with Greek god bodies and amazing 10inch cocks?
Come on. Get over yourselves.
So what, she posed, and she might not be what some of you want, but before you comment, just stand in front of the mirror first, and if you can say you are perfect then go for the comment, but not without showing us your "nekid" self first!!!

have we met before?

Quote
Mickschick
Hey Monkeytonkman! Great comment!
Thanks for saying that,finally, a guy with a brain!
I was just thinkin'... these guys always talk about women like they should be perfect, "wheres her round but, wheres her full breasts..." really!?
Are those men that are making those remarks the most perfect men with Greek god bodies and amazing 10inch cocks?
Come on. Get over yourselves.
So what, she posed, and she might not be what some of you want, but before you comment, just stand in front of the mirror first, and if you can say you are perfect then go for the comment, but not without showing us your "nekid" self first!!!

oh please, since when has the look of the guy anything to do with what he likes in a girl??

ask bill, mick, keith about it.

You guys are on crack - she looks great!

I agree with SNC about the photos themselves kinda sucking. The photographer didn't do a very good job.

I also don't think she's "uncurvy" either. I think she just hasn't gotten to the age of being womanly yet. I didn't get hips till i was about 25. I absolutely hope she doesn't get fake tits - it's hard to wear cool clothes with big boobs. Yeah - they look good in naked and in bathing suits, but she's an east coast girl - you don't get much time in the year to dress that way anyway.

Wasn't looking too good, but I was feeling real well.

Spot on Cindy and Mickschick.

...and hey, all you guys - did you know they needed a special place in hell to burn all those silly silicon requests?

Quote
open-g
...and hey, all you guys - did you know they needed a special place in hell to burn all those silly silicon requests?

wouldn't want to breathe those fumes...

. oops



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010-06-29 11:27 by swiss.

.

Quote
Natlanta
well, the original post was primarily about my confusion re huffpo content, but since you insist on picking nits, yes that's apparently considered to be soft porn:

[en.wikipedia.org]

and fyi from this example you may not be so good at reading minds.

...Wikipedia traces its origins to 2001, when a pair of bored college students, Jimbo Wales and Larry Sanger, decided that the same principles that made things like the graffiti on bathroom stalls great could also be applied to internet encyclopedias.[3] Armed with a pretentious sense of self-righteousness and a can-do attitude, the two bright-eyed youngsters created their website, named "nupedia.com". Naturally, this venture was a spectacular failure. Instead of learning from their mistake, though, Wales and Sanger decided to go the AIG route, and rename their idea while making no real changes to it.

So, they discarded the idea of "nupedia" and switched to "wikipedia", which had four letters before the pedia instead of two, and was therefore twice as good an idea. As time progressed, Wikipedia began to draw lots of attention: from internet nerds to computer geeks to technology lovers to sedentary basement-dwelling internet-surfers, the whole world was talking about Wikipedia.

However, Wikipedia still had to find a way to make money. Although Wales and Sanger toyed with the idea of setting up a small porn server in a subdomain, they eventually decided that nobody really wanted to see them naked,

..I suggest you get better sources for information. And whatever floats your boat.

Most mind-boggling thread in a while here. Agree 100 percent Cindy. Anyone who does not think this is a stunningly beautiful young lady with perfect -- yes perfect -- breasts you are out of your mind or latent homos. (Actually gay men have much appreciation for beautiful women, they just don't want to sleep with them).

So I have no idea what's with so many of you. Big feet? Puah!

She is stunning, and her figure is sublime....some guys!

Quote
crumbling_mice
She is stunning, and her figure is sublime....some guys!

stunning? i would reserve that for girls that don't look like Keith.

Quote
treaclefingers
stunning? i would reserve that for girls that don't look like Keith.

She looks just like her mom. Theodora looks like her dad.

Quote
CindyC

Quote
treaclefingers
stunning? i would reserve that for girls that don't look like Keith.

She looks just like her mom. Theodora looks like her dad.

Regardless, I don't want to see Keith naked, (as a man or woman).

Here in Boston - we like to say "Irregardless".

Pretty funny, this thread has over 5,000 views in 3 days. The WC thread has 14,000+ in 23 days.

Quote
stoneswashed77

Quote
Mickschick
Hey Monkeytonkman! Great comment!
Thanks for saying that,finally, a guy with a brain!
I was just thinkin'... these guys always talk about women like they should be perfect, "wheres her round but, wheres her full breasts..." really!?
Are those men that are making those remarks the most perfect men with Greek god bodies and amazing 10inch cocks?
Come on. Get over yourselves.
So what, she posed, and she might not be what some of you want, but before you comment, just stand in front of the mirror first, and if you can say you are perfect then go for the comment, but not without showing us your "nekid" self first!!!

oh please, since when has the look of the guy anything to do with what he likes in a girl??

ask bill, mick, keith about it.

So how much over weight are you? Mickschick tells it like it is.

Quote
CindyC
Here in Boston - we like to say "Irregardless".

Isn't that a double negative?

I Don't Not Love this Picture, but I DO NOT WANT TO NOT SEE a picture of a body without Keith's face, irregardless of your regard for her.

I hope I've made myself perfectly clear.

It's kind of like seeing a naked picture of LaToya Jackson, and not seeing Michael Jackson.

I know, ew!

Quote
treaclefingers

Quote
CindyC
Here in Boston - we like to say "Irregardless".

Isn't that a double negative?

Yeah - it's totally wrong - that's why I love it.

OK Finally got a chance to see what all the fuss is about. Man, guys, I have to admit I'm embarrassed to be considered one of you if most of you here find anything to fault with her. She looks amazing. Simply stunning.

I wouldn't kick her out of bed!! ha...She looks very hot to me...Great shape.

She looks great to me. I like small natural breast. They look better, and it's much healthier physically and mentally. Simple as that, IMO.

Like da man said, 'anything over a mouthful is wasted.'