For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
stones78
Isn't that Jimmy Miller on the floor instead of Mick Taylor? I mean on the picture
Quote
sweet neo con
the caption says it's Mick Jagger on the floor in the "supine" position.
Quote
BeastQuote
sweet neo con
the caption says it's Mick Jagger on the floor in the "supine" position.
No !@*$(%& way is that MJ!
Quote
BeastQuote
sweet neo con
the caption says it's Mick Jagger on the floor in the "supine" position.
No !@*$(%& way is that MJ!
Quote
Amused
I don't care about this review, anybody giving 4/5 for Exile is non-credible for me!
and I'm more than half-serious now.
Quote
ablett
This is a perfect example of how things get out of hand on this site?
One jouno makes a slight error on a picture credit and the whole article is written off?
Madness.....
You got his opinion on the record, you either agree or not BUT a miss credit on the photo doesn't really warrant "A sign of total historical ignorance, stupidity and idiotic self-importance."
Quote
DoxaQuote
ablett
This is a perfect example of how things get out of hand on this site?
One jouno makes a slight error on a picture credit and the whole article is written off?
Madness.....
You got his opinion on the record, you either agree or not BUT a miss credit on the photo doesn't really warrant "A sign of total historical ignorance, stupidity and idiotic self-importance."
I don't give a shit about having some particular credits right or wrong (I didn't even recognize it, and I don't bother even read the sucker)- but if a "critic" gives 4/5 of EXILE that is a sign of total historical ignorance, stupidity and idiotic self-importance, and I don't respect a rock magazine that has people like that on board. Not my cup of tea.
If I see a review giving 4/5 to EXILE ON MAIN STREET - yes: EXILE ON MAIN STREET!!! - I don't think it has anything to offer me. Why should I read that crap?
- Doxa