The ad on the back page:



"As we say in England, it can get a bit trainspottery"

Huh-oh, not good if MOJO doesn't like the "new" tunes.

Isn't that Jimmy Miller on the floor instead of Mick Taylor? I mean on the picture

Mick Taylor??? I think it's Brian

__________________________

At least his reincarnation

__________________________

the caption says it's Mick Jagger on the floor in the "supine" position.


IORR............but I like it!

I don't care about this review, anybody giving 4/5 for Exile is non-credible for me!
and I'm more than half-serious now.

Quote
stones78
Isn't that Jimmy Miller on the floor instead of Mick Taylor? I mean on the picture

Looks like Jagger in the chair and Miller on the floor.

And it probably was Jagger's protracted professionalism.

Other inaccuracies seem inevitable . . .

looks like they had cantaloupe and bananas with their drugs (right foreground).


IORR............but I like it!

thanks by the ad!

i guess this is the same Mark Paytress (author) that wrote the liner notes for Jamming WIth Edward.

[www.rocksbackpages.com]


IORR............but I like it!

Thanks for the article!!!!

For not ever having many pictures of Jimmy Miller, that one of him on the floor is pretty funny.

(Robert Altman photo 1969)


IORR............but I like it!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010-04-27 23:23 by sweet neo con.

I don't know where it is but there is one picture of Miller where he looks like a ragged out roadie. It's supreme! I think I've only ever seen maybe 4 pictures of the dude with the Stones. That one there is new to me! Is that...when was that? Let It Bleed time, end of 1971/early 72 for Exile or Goats Head Soup? Mick's haircut was similar to that one for those times wasn't it?

...people who do such errors on a picture can't do a good record's critic......
(Keith,Mick Jagger on chair,Jimmy on the ground)..very surprising from a very
talented magazine...

I can see a Fender Rhodes piano on the far left side...

mick has never had a tummy like that... )

The picture rescanned and cropped.


If anyone missed it, the photo is by Dominique Tarlé
If anyone can photoshop out the text..........


"As we say in England, it can get a bit trainspottery"



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2010-04-28 09:26 by Deltics.

Is it Gram lying down? I reckon it's Jagger playing an acoustic.

NickB

You can't always get what you want.....

www.myspace.com/thesonkings

Rolling Stone got the photo ID'd right, in Rock Man's scan on this page: [www.iorr.org]


- photo by Dominque Tarle ~ scan courtesy of Rock Man



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010-04-28 00:39 by with sssoul.

Quote
sweet neo con
the caption says it's Mick Jagger on the floor in the "supine" position.

No !@*$(%& way is that MJ!

Quote
Beast

Quote
sweet neo con
the caption says it's Mick Jagger on the floor in the "supine" position.

No !@*$(%& way is that MJ!

I reckon it's either Miller or Parsons.

NickB

You can't always get what you want.....

www.myspace.com/thesonkings

Quote
Beast

Quote
sweet neo con
the caption says it's Mick Jagger on the floor in the "supine" position.

No !@*$(%& way is that MJ!

just to be clear....i didn't say it was MJ...just saying that's what the caption said.
i was pointing out the error.

i haven't seen enough photos of Miller or Parsons to know for sure....but I would
believe the Rolling Stone Magazine caption...that it's Miller.


IORR............but I like it!

it's mick jagger and keith playing guitars and jimmy miller on the floor

Quote
Amused
I don't care about this review, anybody giving 4/5 for Exile is non-credible for me!
and I'm more than half-serious now.

Exactly. MOJO is dead for me now on. A sign of total historical ignorance, stupidity and idiotic self-importance. Let they wank by themselves. I don't bother even to read the article.

You know, it is with these kind of issues I check the credibility of a paper/journal/magazine. How they are able to deal with topics that are way beyond anything they represent. MOJO just didn't pass. Small people they are. They just lost one reader.'

If they think that the BEST - as it is said there - Stones album is worth of 4/5 I don't think a Rolling Stones fan has any reason to read their stuff. Well, they can argue that it is barely an opinion of one particular writer, but bullshit: it is the decision of MOJO to let a person like that to write, and it is nothing but their judgment to release crap like that.

Let us all boycott MOJO!

- Doxa



Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 2010-04-28 11:35 by Doxa.

This is a perfect example of how things get out of hand on this site?

One jouno makes a slight error on a picture credit and the whole article is written off?

Madness.....

You got his opinion on the record, you either agree or not BUT a miss credit on the photo doesn't really warrant "A sign of total historical ignorance, stupidity and idiotic self-importance."

Me I'm glad to see MOJO shares my point of view : the extra CD should have been EOMS alt. versions only.
Who cares about half-finished riffs from 71... if they weren't decent then, why should they be now?

Quote
ablett
This is a perfect example of how things get out of hand on this site?

One jouno makes a slight error on a picture credit and the whole article is written off?

Madness.....

You got his opinion on the record, you either agree or not BUT a miss credit on the photo doesn't really warrant "A sign of total historical ignorance, stupidity and idiotic self-importance."

I don't give a shit about having some particular credits right or wrong (I didn't even recognize it, and I don't bother even read the sucker)- but if a "critic" gives 4/5 of EXILE that is a sign of total historical ignorance, stupidity and idiotic self-importance, and I don't respect a rock magazine that has people like that on board. Not my cup of tea.

If I see a review giving 4/5 to EXILE ON MAIN STREET - yes: EXILE ON MAIN STREET!!! - I don't think it has anything to offer me. Why should I read that crap?

- Doxa



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010-04-28 11:46 by Doxa.

Quote
Doxa

Quote
ablett
This is a perfect example of how things get out of hand on this site?

One jouno makes a slight error on a picture credit and the whole article is written off?

Madness.....

You got his opinion on the record, you either agree or not BUT a miss credit on the photo doesn't really warrant "A sign of total historical ignorance, stupidity and idiotic self-importance."

I don't give a shit about having some particular credits right or wrong (I didn't even recognize it, and I don't bother even read the sucker)- but if a "critic" gives 4/5 of EXILE that is a sign of total historical ignorance, stupidity and idiotic self-importance, and I don't respect a rock magazine that has people like that on board. Not my cup of tea.

If I see a review giving 4/5 to EXILE ON MAIN STREET - yes: EXILE ON MAIN STREET!!! - I don't think it has anything to offer me. Why should I read that crap?

- Doxa

I think he docked a star because he doesn't like the 'outtakes', which is either a fair point or an outrage of outrageous proportions, depending which side of the fence you sit on about the merits of the 'new' old songs. I like Plundered My Soul, but it doesn't belong on the Exile reissue.