Should they replicate the sound of 1969and early 70's? I am for it. The bigger the guitars the better. But that would mean that Mick and Charlie would have to step back a little. That is the big problem. I don't see Mick agreeing to turn down his microphone for the sake of a nastier sound like on "exile". On the NO-security cd the voices and the drums are really upfront whic
Forum: Tell Me

Probably not. I can't see one of them staying at home clinking to read about the rolling stones. It has been more than 40 years now, of gossip, rumours, lies, thruths about them. For them it's probably the same BS. I can't imagine what would be the driving force that would make one of them reading about the rolling stones from the internet. Everything has been said already.
Forum: Tell Me

I agree with your remarks. The stones live or the stones on bootlegs sound often better than the official stuff on cd. It is true that by adding to many musicians on stage or in the studio the stones dilute the power of the basic 5. But remember that us the stone maniacs are a small # compare to the thousands of people who occassionally by a cd or a ticket and don't put to much thoughts int
Forum: Tell Me