Quotecrumbling_mice wish they could lose chuck leavell, he is seriously messing up sp many songs. What he does on SFTD is just dreadful As for SFTD I agree 100%.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteStonesBlake How about Gimme Shelter or BS? A little shot of energy to the same songs played the same way for 20+ years would be great. But don't dare drop CYHMK. How about LOVE IN VAIN?!! Come on Jagger, it is so obvious this needs to be the next change. 100%
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteSilver Dagger Quotewith sssoul QuoteSilver Dagger Love the song myself. Yes, it has sentimental lyrics but what's wrong with that? And it's a great solo. The song reprents the softer side of the Stones. They're not cock rocking misogynists all the time. I'm sorry to dis a track you love, Silver Dagger honey, but I wanted to clarify that it's not sentimentality or
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteSilver Dagger Love the song myself. Yes, it has sentimental lyrics but what's wrong with that? And it's a great solo. The song reprents the softer side of the Stones. They're not cock rocking misogynists all the time. I remember the same criticism coming out when Black And Blue was released. That album revealed a different side of the Stones especially with the beautiful Me
Forum: Tell Me

I think that this is a kind of song shouldn't be performed sloppy at all, they should rehearse it VERY WELL before playing it in concert, i think that it's quite sensitive song as for guitar playing and singing...
Forum: Tell Me

The Stones have many great songs that they almost never have played live but I think Salt of the Earth is one of the very best of those songs, I have seen Mick and Axl Rose duet and I think it was great, what do you think about this song and why do you think that they haven't played it almost never? And Jigsaw Puzzle is also a very good song...
Forum: Tell Me

Quotecrumbling_mice That is truly breathtaking...I so hope they keep this in the set list. Mr Jagger, if you are reading this please use Mick Taylor more, it will go down as the tour to end all tours and it would be a fitting tribute to The Rolling Stones - The Greatest Rock n Roll band in the world. We don;t need special guests on guitars, just unleash Taylor and let it rock! 100%
Forum: Tell Me

Quoteironbelly Ok. But where HD pro shot video and Hi-res stereo soundboard? I really hope there will be a blu-ray including at least these songs with Mick Taylor playing...
Forum: Tell Me

How about SAD SAD SAD + Mixed Emotions with Mick Taylor playing Sticky Fingers sound like guitar lead?
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteThe Mez Heavenly bliss big WOW!!! Whats next Love in Vain, Little Queenie.... MEZ Mick Taylor in CYHMK + Sway + Love in Vain + Midnight Rambler + Sympathy
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteDandelionPowderman Quotesabata Sway A few more run-throughs in the rehearsal room, and this one will be great! Great solos by Ronnie and Taylor CYHMK is awesome and Mick Taylor solo is awesome in Sway, it's truly amazing to hear they play these songs in this way in 2013!
Forum: Tell Me

Quotebluesinc. so, time waits for no one is left, isn´t it? Hey, let's be realistic here... (at least a little bit!)
Forum: Tell Me

Quotemarianna Maybe Mick Taylor earned his way to those extra two songs tonight. He's been doing an excellent job on MR. I'm also not sure he'll be doing this many songs on the tour again for a while, at least. It's the fourth show in the same market so they had to add some variety to the set list. Still, nice to see an actual Rolling Stone emeritus get the special guest sp
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteThrylan QuoteEddieByword Quotewinter QuoteEddieByword QuoteThrylan I really hope they pulled these off, and got a good reaction. One hopes they are as aggressive with the warhouse section too. That's what I thought, revamp the 2nd half and we'll be getting somewhere......... You mean like replacing Satisfaction with a 7 minute version of "2120 S Michigan Ave" where Ja
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteLorenz Sway and CYHMK - that's quite something! I'm gonna make an official complaining that they didn't do Love in Vain with Taylor, just Sway, CYHMK and Midnight Rambler.
Forum: Tell Me

Tt seems a absolutetly amazing setlis, I hope the videos are good and Taylor has succeeded well and I hope that Mick Taylor will get more playtime now permanently, maybe they have planned from beginning to give him more playtime after a few shows, and somebody has speculated (or even known?) about this earlier in this forum. I don't even dream about more than 3 songs for Mick Taylor, I w
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteUGot2Rollme Quoterollingon I think that Keith and Ronnie could sit down on chairs and focus on just playing, they don't have to stand, for me it's enough that Jagger moves around I think Keith and Ronnie could play much better by sitting down. I liked it during No Security tour when Keith sat down for Silver. He focused more on playing and singing the song back then. Otherwise,
Forum: Tell Me

I think that Keith and Ronnie could sit down on chairs and focus on just playing, they don't have to stand, for me it's enough that Jagger moves around I think Keith and Ronnie could play much better by sitting down.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteWindyHorses Quotestonehearted QuoteWuudy I just think it's weird that people here make all these weird assumption based on nothing. We can't have a clue about how they feel It's based on something--Jagger's own words. After 50 years of being in the same band and having known each other since grammar school--spanning all but 7 of their 70-odd years--Mick can only refer t
Forum: Tell Me

Quotebigfrankie Keith always does the solo on Bitch (even in 72), just like he did in the studio. I don't care either way about Grohl. He said a stupid thing about Keith in that documentary. If you want to haev him guset for one song, no big deal. The big deal is MT hanging around doing nothing. He steps up, makes MR the highlight of the show. Hangs around for a while more and maybe comes
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteBrstonesfan The 3 guitar approach just adds a lot to the tempo. That is the biggest problem for yrs IMO. The songs are simply played too slow . Yes, I agree with this. There should be more speed but maybe they are playing slower because it becomes more difficult to keep it together if the tempo is faster. Even now there are obvious difficulties in guitar playing. I personally like ver
Forum: Tell Me

Quotecrumbling_mice Yes, I was meaning the two guitar assault via Taylor and Keith. On reflection, I'm probably letting this Taylor thing sour my judgement of what has so far been a great tour. I'll just keep my fingers crossed that public pressure gets to Jagger and they let him on for 3 or 4 songs. Maybe it's in the contract that he plays more when they get to the UK, maybe not.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteRocky Dijon I think Crumbling Mice's point is the studio recording is very much a two-guitar assault (Keith and Mr. Taylor) as it was when played live in 1972 and 1973. The live performances since then have never matched what was accomplished initially. From the STEEL WHEELS tour on, it's mainly been a song for the horns and little else. I have always thought Bitch is the best tr
Forum: Tell Me

Quotecrumbling_mice The thing that really irks me is that you would be hard pushed to find a Stones fan who would prefer to see Dave Grohl playing the solo on Bitch in place of Mick Taylor. Yet here we have a situation where Taylor (one of the world's best rock lead players) is standing in the wings watching Dave Grohl play on a song that he recorded with the band. Now if playing a show is g
Forum: Tell Me

Jimi Hendrix The Doors Bod Dylan Janis Joplin Some ABBA songs (What a shame!) Some Beatles songs Early U2
Forum: Tell Me

Quotedrbryant I haven't read the entire thread, so I might have missed it, but the difference between this SFTD solo and others on the tour is pretty obvious to me - he's not walking around the ramp while he plays. Think about a guy nearing 70, playing the guitar while walking around a four foot wide circular ramp that slopes down and up at the ends, all the while having to maintai
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteGRNRBITW Quoterollingon QuoteLong John Stoner Quotehbwriter And if you look at Jagger with Grohl - he seems to be feeling, "Thank god someone with crazy energy like me is up here - this is what a show is supposed to be" What he's doing is using Grohl as a Keith substitute. He'll play and get all excited with Raitt, Fogerty, Perry, Mayer, Urban and Grohl, but not Keith.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteLong John Stoner Quotehbwriter And if you look at Jagger with Grohl - he seems to be feeling, "Thank god someone with crazy energy like me is up here - this is what a show is supposed to be" What he's doing is using Grohl as a Keith substitute. He'll play and get all excited with Raitt, Fogerty, Perry, Mayer, Urban and Grohl, but not Keith. It's his way of punishin
Forum: Tell Me

Quotehbwriter And if you look at Jagger with Grohl - he seems to be feeling, "Thank god someone with crazy energy like me is up here - this is what a show is supposed to be" I agree that Grohl brought great energy to the show, it would be really great if this kind of energy level would exist throughout the show, his guitar playing was ok at first but it went too far in the end and did
Forum: Tell Me

Quotealimente Quotemtaylor Quoterollingon Quoteandrewt Quoteroby SFTD... 3:26, Keith tries an approach... No, thanks guy. Wow. I am stunned how neutered SFTD is. The solo is down to a few notes over four bars or so. As an end to the main set it is shocking how little energy the performance has, as if they just wanted to get it over with. I haven't seen any really good and inspired p
Forum: Tell Me