For those who have an interest in statistics: As I see on Mediatraffic Global chart, "Hackney Diamonds" is #1 worldwide with 386.000 "equivalent sales" this week.
There are two new entries on Top 10. The Stones and Blink - 182 (#2, with 196.000 "equivalent sales").
Some decades ago, I couldn't imagine the Stones coming top in the Global Chart,
at the age Forum: Tell Me
OK, I'll try...
Jumpin' Jack Flash
Gimme Shelter
Paint It Black
Dead Flowers
Sympathy For The Devil
Honky Tonk Women
Wild Horses
Midnight Rambler
Sway
Brown Sugar
Sweet Virginia
You Got The Silver
Satisfaction
Start Me Up
YCAGWYW
Far Away Eyes
Beast Of Burden
Coming Down Again
Angie
One Hit To The Body Forum: Tell Me
As for the tracks, sorry, I can't select 20, I need 60 (at least...)
As for the albums:
1. Sticky Fingers
2. Exile
3. Let It Bleed
4. Beggars Banquet
5. Tattoo You Forum: Tell Me
It seems like the sales are really strong, globaly. Look at the whole picture, that's matters...
Honestly, I can't undestand the complaints about #3 on US chart. If I count correctly, in the entire Stones history we only have 9 studio albums reaching #1 there and the last one was "Tattoo You". On the other hand, "Tattoo You", "Some Girls" and other studi Forum: Tell Me
If I remember correctly, the same guy or other guy from the same pathetic band (that's my opinion about TS), a few years ago said the Stones SHOULD use more musicians, "as Pink Floyd did", because they are old (he also said that Led Zeppelin was a nauseus live band in 1975). Now he says that the Stones ALREADY use backing guitarist. Great, the Stones followed his advice...
In t Forum: Tell Me
Thanks for the info, Doxa!
Considering the general level of sales, in each era, "Blue and Lonesome" and "ABB" were clearly more successful than some albums of 70s... Forum: Tell Me
Yes, I just saw the numbers on Wikipedia too. But they did ... wrong addition and they gave wrong total number of attendance (665,602 instead of 712, 541).
So we have average attendance 50,895, including a small venue (Berlin), by these prices. Not bad at all... Forum: Tell Me
Despite their age, the Stones sounded really good once again (I mean the entire Sixty Tour, of course). That would NOT happen, if Ronnie was bad. Ronnie's playing was sufficient or even better, overall. He was doing what he had to do. I judge Ronnie by his general contribution, not by "moments". All musicians have weak moments on stage, Mick included. All musicians, even those who Forum: Tell Me
I had been reader of IORR forum many years before I joined the site. I remember Mathijs saying "I'm done with the Stones" (or something like that) during ABB tour. Glad to see another Mathijs review, 15 years later!
Finally, the Stones are rolling in our blood. Period. Forum: Tell Me
I think that, if some fans were judging the gigs of the "golden era" by their current criteria, by this spirit of "now I'm noting moments of sloopiness, now I'm counting mistakes", then many nights of 1978 and 1981 tours could be considered as "mediocre", if not "horrible" rounds...
The Stones still put on a hell of a show - yes, at the age o Forum: Tell Me
I remember another Stones concert that took place next day after Mick's birthday - and it was his 60th birthday. Prague 2003. I didn't imagine, then, the band putting on such great gigs, after 19 years... Fortunately, they still can do it and they do it! Forum: Tell Me
I remember them playing 19 songs in 2003. so, 18 songs (still two hours gigs), at their 79, under heat waves, that isn't big deal for me.
(But, please, not less than 19, right Mick, Keith and Ronnie ?) Forum: Tell Me
"I feel like sometimes people are judging Keith more based on how he looks on stage rather than how he plays".
That's right, RaiseTheKnife... But, IMO, people who judge Keith by this criterion
are bacically among the so called "hard core" fans, let's say among the "all time complaining" ... wing of IORR forum...
Out there, people seem to judge things Forum: Tell Me
"I think you guys exaggerate a bit when it comes to the difference between the concerts. Judging from videos, I also thought that Brussels was better than Amsterdam (especially Keith seemed more vital and energetic), but Amsterdam wasn't such a lackluster concert that some people here claim it to be (...)
In my perception, the differences are there but not that extreme."
Agree Forum: Tell Me