QuoteTaylor1 Which guitar does Taylor play on the extended version. Is it the one in the left speaker that takes the solo or the one in the right speaker that plays the last note when the song ends Taylor - right speaker Richards - left speaker * There is no "extra guitar". Just two guitars. Richards plays a little rhythm instead of lead the whole time. There is no point with
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs QuoteProfessorWolf this seems relevant to the conversation at hand so i thought i'd repost it here What does the black writing say? Fr.XXX, 1st show, Pt. II? Mathijs Other possibilities considering resting the pen and creating an unwanted dot: FROM 1st SHOW PT II FRANK 1st SHOW PT II
Forum: Tell Me

I recall being able to hear it throughout.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs We know for sure Keith was playing a 12-string at the Marque, but there's no acoustic to be seen for Taylor. Mathijs Interesting. I imagine they would have performed it the same way at Newcastle or any other early shows. Hopefully there is a recording out there, maybe even a tour rehearsal.
Forum: Tell Me

Quotedcba Not Mathijs but I think they would have played it mostly acoustic à la "1969 Prodigal on". Keith on acoustic guitar in front of a mike and MT on electric, playing the solo with a clean tone. Which makes the dramatic rework of WH done for the 75 tour (100% electric with a heavily processed (flanger?) guitar tone) all the more interesting. Yeah, I'm not sure how they
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteDandelionPowderman The guitar most likely was played through a Leslie. I don't think they had the MXR Phaser in 1975. Regarding WH, they could have done it the Sweet Virginia-way at the Marquee, or with an electric. Both approaches could have worked nicely, imo. I'm not sure when they got the pedal, but it was around in 1975. I only remember seeing the 12-string in the shot
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteTravelinMan QuoteMathijs Quotedcba Really? I thought they followed the M.O. introduced in 69. Let the band warm up with each gig played, then pro-tape the end of the tour when the band's really hot (NY + Boston). They did that in 69 72 and 73 ("down-under"). Of course the tiny distances between each gig of the "Farewell" tour made possible the use of the Mo
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteTaylor1 How is Taylor's rhythm guitaron Live With Me and on Star Star any different than all the guitars on Brown Sugar. And the great solo on the outro to Star Star which is buried in thecrappy mix for which Giles Martin did nothing to improve sounds like Keith or Taylor. How many people who were around in 1968 when Beggar's Banquet came
Forum: Tell Me

Some people might not agree with me, but on I'm Going Down it sounds like Taylor trying to play like Richards. It's got a Broken Hands vibe IMO.
Forum: Tell Me

I listened to the instrumental and don't hear anything Taylor-esque about the parts. Maybe he played the acoustic lol. We know how the Stones love to put the acoustic in Taylor's hands: see the live rendition of Satisfaction from 2013!
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs Quotedcba Really? I thought they followed the M.O. introduced in 69. Let the band warm up with each gig played, then pro-tape the end of the tour when the band's really hot (NY + Boston). They did that in 69 72 and 73 ("down-under"). Of course the tiny distances between each gig of the "Farewell" tour made possible the use of the Mobile lorry for ea
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs QuoteTravelinMan But, let’s not forget. You and others were skeptical at one point about the rhythm guitar on Bitch saying it’s too crunchy to be Taylor, the rhythm is unique etc. BUT then the extended take came out and it was blatantly obvious it was Taylor because by the time they got to the end of the song that would be faded out he was throwing in extended runs and licks. Th
Forum: Tell Me

Btw, guitar players: Do you play Berry rhythms with strictly down strokes or do you alternate up and down strokes. Interesting results the second way, which isn’t usually the way “taught”.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs QuoteTravelinMan QuoteMathijs QuoteTravelinMan Regarding parts: anybody could have played the Berry rhythm. Sure, but nobody plays it like Keith. This is 100% Keith. Mathijs It sounds like a pretty basic Berry rhythm lower in the mix than the other electric. Nothing profound, nothing unique. Listen again. The timing and phrasing of the Berry boogie rhythm is fantastic -it
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteMathijs QuoteTravelinMan Regarding parts: anybody could have played the Berry rhythm. Sure, but nobody plays it like Keith. This is 100% Keith. Mathijs It sounds like a pretty basic Berry rhythm lower in the mix than the other electric. Nothing profound, nothing unique.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteFP QuoteTravelinMan QuoteFP Quoteexilestones In The Studio: Recording The Rolling Stones “Brown Sugar” Sessions November 21, 2020 Bruce Borgerson Reconstructing the night that produced a rock song for the ages... full article It's interesting how Jimmy Johnson talks about Richards and Taylor's amp micing and positioning. I love how Keith has to have his amp enclosed i
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteFP Quoteexilestones In The Studio: Recording The Rolling Stones “Brown Sugar” Sessions November 21, 2020 Bruce Borgerson Reconstructing the night that produced a rock song for the ages... full article It's interesting how Jimmy Johnson talks about Richards and Taylor's amp micing and positioning. I love how Keith has to have his amp enclosed in a booth with the door s
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteFP Listening to all these takes I think that firstly there were lots of guitar parts recorded, the crazy Leslie speak solo and various Keith and Taylor solo ideas shows how much experimentation there was to get the vision Keith had in his head for the track. It would be interesting to know for certain if all the guitars were recorded at Muscle Shoals. I would assume Keith's main rhyt
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteFP Mix with some nice jangling arpeggios, the posted says it is MT but I think it is KR. Not sure if the arpeggio guitar is double tracked or a 12 string as sounds a bit chorusey. However Taylor solo at 1.50 and 3.20. Pleasant but not his greatest IMO and can understand why they were removed. video: That's pretty close to the Altamont version which has the same Arpeggios, but B
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteDoxa Comparing EXILE - probably the greatest rock album ever made - to some blues hero tribute album is as trivial as discussing if SGT. PEPPER is more blues than GREATEST HITS by ABBA. Sometimes it feels like'the blues' is seen like some metaphysical or mystical item. It's not. It is just music. Clapton's Robert Johnson tribute might be weak, but it is still a pure bl
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteRisingStone QuoteTravelinMan QuoteRisingStone QuoteTravelinMan I bought the Mr. Johnson album (CD) in the mountains of North Georgia in an old record store. I listened to it on the drive through the mountains back home to east Tennessee. So my first experience with the album is about as Earthy as one can get. I think Doyle Bramhall's slide is a fantastic addition. You inspired me to
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteRisingStone QuoteTravelinMan I bought the Mr. Johnson album (CD) in the mountains of North Georgia in an old record store. I listened to it on the drive through the mountains back home to east Tennessee. So my first experience with the album is about as Earthy as one can get. I think Doyle Bramhall's slide is a fantastic addition. You inspired me to pop the album in again, and I
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteRisingStone QuoteTravelinMan QuoteRisingStone QuoteTravelinMan QuoteRisingStone The Rolling Stones had already released a blues album decades before Blue & Lonesome came out — that is Exile On Main Street. To me, the music they deliver on that double album sounds much bluesier than on the rather slick B & L. The overall coarse-tonal texture is the key. For me, EOMS is the blues album
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteRisingStone QuoteTravelinMan QuoteRisingStone The Rolling Stones had already released a blues album decades before Blue & Lonesome came out — that is Exile On Main Street. To me, the music they deliver on that double album sounds much bluesier than on the rather slick B & L. The overall coarse-tonal texture is the key. For me, EOMS is the blues album by the boys. Speaking of that
Forum: Tell Me

The funny thing about blues music is it was intended to be pop music at the time, with performers in flashy clothes trying to make money etc. This idea of the rustic, lonesome bluesman is largely a construct created in retrospect by white scholars and music marketers.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteRisingStone The Rolling Stones had already released a blues album decades before Blue & Lonesome came out — that is Exile On Main Street. To me, the music they deliver on that double album sounds much bluesier than on the rather slick B & L. The overall coarse-tonal texture is the key. For me, EOMS is the blues album by the boys. Speaking of that — another example of a slick blues
Forum: Tell Me

Weren’t the original vocals famously erased by Jagger when he did a new version for a movie with Whoopie Goldberg?
Forum: Tell Me

Had a free ticket to see Clapton in Nashville last fall. I went and was honestly surprised at how good it was. Classic creamy tone, powerful voice, amazing band.
Forum: Tell Me

There are some Terry Reid shows from the 90’s with Mick Taylor on lead guitar for the entire set. Well worth seeking out.
Forum: Tell Me

It sounds like modern Jagger singing. I think the "strangest year" line is even referring to the pandemic. The original, Some Girls era lyrics aren't finished. Funny enough, he sings "the white girls go insane" on the bootleg, which is an obvious reference to Hendrix. He changed to "crowd goes insane" on the modern version.
Forum: Tell Me