For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
The Joker
Anita Pallenberg was considered somehow as being a Rolling Stone.
she was killer on cowbell for that htw intro.
Quote
HMS
If Daryl would quit, the Stones would find a reasonable substitute within two weeks and still carry on. They have replaced Bill Wyman, so they can without doubt replace Daryl Jones. Daryl is a fine player but not irreplaceable.
Quote
GasLightStreet
Seeing the only one person has quit the Stones
Quote
Turner68
Are we talking about whether he is part of the band or whether he is a rolling stone...
Quote
OllyQuote
Turner68
Are we talking about whether he is part of the band or whether he is a rolling stone...
The answer's in the title of the discussion.
Quote
Amused
14 years, not 20. He's been with them since 1994.
He's just not as important as the big four...
Quote
Big Al
He's a hired-hand. Along with Chuck Leavell and Bernard Fowler, he's a component of their touring ensemble. He's a backup musician. Certainly, his role is a primary one, but he clearly isn't a Rolling Stone. Why is this even debateable?
No. and never will beQuote
stoneMe
Sorry if this has been disgust here before.
Can anyone tell me Why Daryl Jones is not considered A True Member of the Rolling Stones? Afterall he`s played bass for them for nearly 20 years give or take a year or two, That`s more than Brian Jones and Mick Taylor put together yet he`s still treated like an outsider when it comes to Official photo`s or Merchandice. It just seems abit wrong to me.
Just wanted to know how other Stones fans see it
Quote
Big Al
He's a hired-hand. Along with Chuck Leavell and Bernard Fowler, he's a component of their touring ensemble. He's a backup musician. Certainly, his role is a primary one, but he clearly isn't a Rolling Stone. Why is this even debateable?
Quote
NaturalustQuote
GasLightStreet
Seeing the only one person has quit the Stones
Well I can think of at least two..Mick Taylor and Bill Wyman and that's not including sidemen who may or may not have quit for various reasons. Certainly Lisa is saying it was her choice to not play with them this time around.
Besides we never got a chance to really hear Brian's side of the story...for all we know he said something like "Well cock, you can't fire me because I bloody quit!"
Quote
SweetThing
Perhaps an interesting sidebar for some... I believe Bill Wyman says that when he quit, he put it to Mick, Keith and Charlie to make Ronnie Wood a "full" member on the business end (for those proceeds that are, and were, split 4 ways).
Now, perhaps this isn't true or Bill exaggerates his part in this, or The Glimmers would have done it anyway, since they didn't stand to lose percentage wise anything they weren't prepared to do so with Wyman still in the band.... but anyway, for what its worth.... Would Ronnie STILL be on salary had Bill not left? I don't know..
Quote
jlowe
I think in some aspects of the business set up, even now, Ronnie is not included.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Ronnie became an official member in 1991, no?
Quote
The JokerQuote
jlowe
I think in some aspects of the business set up, even now, Ronnie is not included.
The ultimate level is a foundation for Mick J, Keith and Charlie offspring, to limit inheritance tax, I read..
Is it connectected to Promotone BV?
BTW, Promotone BV is presented in a funny way, according to Wikipedia
[en.wikipedia.org]
Promotone's headquarters is in Amsterdam in the Netherlands.[3] The company's activities are officially activities categorized as: environmental services, culture, recreation and other services