casual fans (long post)
Date: July 19, 2008 05:27
The Rolling Stones are still my all time favorite band, but I've come to realize that I would probably be considered more of a casual fan than a hardcore fan by most people on this board. There are a few reasons for this...
1. I do not worship the Stones. They are human beings and I do not idolize them. Infact I think very poorly of their private lives, except for Charlie and Bill as they have demonstrated integrity through the years. Charlie is the man. The guy has every ounce of talent in tact, looks old and rocks my face off. On top of that he is STILL happily married and has an amazing jazz band on the side.
I'm not a fan of Jagger as a person but I think he's the greatest frontman in rock n roll history! Androgynous, effeminate, a-moral, relativist, unfaithful... You can call it being a 'bad boy of rocknroll' if you like. On stage he's fantastic and still puts on an amazing show.
Ronnie Wood is the single most underrated guitarist of all time, and without him the Stones would have faded into has-been status. Because of Ronnie we have Some Girls, etc... I wonder what the Stones would have been like without the Ron Wood era!
Keith Richards is still the man for the sole reason that he continues to play guitar. My friends who are musicians will readily admit that they are impressed with Keith, not for his magnificent ability, but for the fact that he has intense horrendous arthritis and continues to play. Sure he might not be up to par with his past performances (compare Undercover from the Shine A Light bonus footage to ANY previous performance you've ever seen), but he still rocks. His personal life... Not much to lookup to there.
Bryan Jones was a brilliant musician but had little moral fiber to be spoken of. He treated women poorly, was an alcholic and drug addict beyond repair. If you saw him on the street pandering for acid you'd probably laugh at him... He's in a rock band and gets to be creative and everyone thinks the world of him. Amazing thing really..
Bill Wyman got out when he felt like it, not when he thought the Stones were at their peak. No doubt he endured alot of bullsh1t to get to that point too. I can't even begin to imagine what the Dirty Work sessions were like in person. He wanted to spend time with his family, look back and indulge in his collection of memorabilia and book-writing, etc... I admire that. Wish he hadn't quit, but seeing all the crap behind the scenes for that long, I can see why.
Their private lives do not affect my enjoyment of the music, but it does affect how I view the band in general. I also find it mind-numbing that anyone can sit back and say "Keith looks better than ever!" when in reality he looks like shit! I love the guy but I'm not gonna kiss his ass on any forum. Keith looks horrible. They're old. They can't look 'good', they can be presentable and put on a good show. Jagger as a sex idol is a funny concept to me. He could be your grandfather! And he's gyrating infront of you like he's 18. Keith is the man and he dresses appropriately for who he is and what he wants to do, but he is not 'hot' nor does he look good. He looks exactly like you'd expect a former heroin junkie to look. Ronnie is great, as long as he's not sh1tfaced off booze. CHARLIE. IS. THE. MAN. Always was, always will be.
2. I own every recording the Rolling Stones have ever put out, but I don't listen to them every day of my life. I think most people on this board listen to the Stones every day, at the very least. I'd say I listen to them atleast once or twice a week, or they popup randomly on my ipod. I have quite a good collection of bootlegs and have recorded a few myself (2002 - 2006, atleast 5 recordings that I can remember) but I don't feel the need to be constantly collecting.
I am certain that there are alot of studio outtakes and live recordings I would love to have (this one comes to mind:
but I don't trade very often. I look for new torrents on dimeadozen about once a month, and even then I'm pretty picky about what I add to my collection.
Most collectors I know are constantly trading, acquiring more and more boots, getting all shows from all tours, etc... Multiple releases, silver discs... I just don't see the point. Investing all that time and money and effort for ONE band?
3. I like alot of bands. I mean ALOT of bands. The Rolling Stones are still the absolute tops of my personal tastes (even my lastfm profile reflects that) but I love alot of other bands. I could write for days about all of the amazing NEW (I repeat NEW NEW NEW NEW) bands that are just now releasing albums I find mind shatteringly awesome.
- Black Mountain (sounds like Pink Floyd meets Black Sabbath)
- Arcade Fire (one of the best bands to come out in my lifetime)
- The Black Angels (could be the next Doors)
- Secret Machines (Now Here Is Nowhere is the first album I bought for my girlfriend)
- Minus the Bear (danceable rocknroll with heavy heavy guitars!)
- Hey Rosetta! (catchy melodic experimental rock)
- Giraffes? Giraffes! (not for effect, thats what they're called. their first album is alright, but their second album 'More Skin With Milk Mouth' or something like that is $*#@'ing amazing math rock!!!)
- Radiohead (the epitome of ambient, atmospheric indie rock)
- Explosions In The Sky (some of the most beautiful music you will ever hear in your life. 'All Of A Sudden I Miss Everyone' is one of the greatest albums I have ever heard, and I own it on vinyl.)
None of these bands has replaced the Rolling Stones for me, but they come close enough to get played frequently, whereas I don't play Exile every day, but rather a few times a year.
I'm curious if there are any other fans out there who feel like this. I used to consider myself a hardcore fan, and I'm known for it among friends, but the more I encounter hardcore fans I find that I am really more casual. The Rolling Stones are STILL and probably always WILL BE my ALL TIME FAVORITE BAND, but I'm not neurotic about it, nor do I listen to them every day of my life.
D.