For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
texas fan
I certainly agree that Jagger's singing was better in '72.
Quote
Beelyboy
exceptional double guitars playing in total sync with each other; infectious, jangly, aggressive; and then a stinging, whining, ultra hot lead. bass is doing tremendous work. all 5 of totally on it. great harmony vokes; good beat and you can dance to it; how bout that '64 tour?
Quote
MCDDTLC
Beely - Did you see the entire concert here??
The stones followed James Brown and Jagger looked so funny with these goofy
steps after James ripped up the place with his foot-work. The Stones were
watching from back-stage, in awe, and really looked like amateurs after Mr.
Brown's set...
MLC
Quote
cc
I don't follow your questions, plexi. Simply because the band reached a peak doesn't mean it should have quit. And how would they have known they had reached a peak before they tried to do better?
Quote
Beelyboy
hey YEAH casino boogie; what a beautiful post!
and tho already familiar with it, i really listened to it again over and over before posting. didn't want to make joke, (tho some humor was intended because it's the '72/'75 thead)...
it's already totally there in '64, isn't it. my my...
Quote
timbernardisQuote
cc
I don't follow your questions, plexi. Simply because the band reached a peak doesn't mean it should have quit. And how would they have known they had reached a peak before they tried to do better?
Well, I think a lot of people on this board decided YEARS ago that 72/3 was the peak. If there have been literally years of disappointment since then or, put another way, subpar music and performances, why bother to continue listening to and following the Stones?
I suppose some did just opt out, quit following them.
plexi