Tell Me :
Talk
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Keith this and Keith that ...
Posted by:
Hasse78
()
Date: July 6, 2007 11:07
It seems that Keith has age quite alot since they released their first album. lol. 
Re: insatiable
Posted by:
LA FORUM
()
Date: July 6, 2007 12:13
with sssoul Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >> Specualtions about their lives is part of their
> fame. <<
>
> right. so what happened to "if the music was
> great all the time noone would care"?
> as noted above: one of the wonders of the internet
> is that folks post just any old idle notions,
> thoughtful or not, and it doesn't necessarily mean
> much, does it.
Yeah I should have edited that but who cares. The point is, when the magic is gone (it's still there now and then), when they are no longer "immortal rock gods" and yet go on year after year (nothing wrong with that) and their fame still monumental what is there to speculate about if they dont produce music. If they released good music or changed in some new direction re-fueled youd be busy enjoying them. Besides, gossip is easier on the internet. But remember when Love is strong was released. I loved it. It was the "real" stones again, a little danger, bluesy but not boring. I nag about their comeback years (1989-) but 1994-1995, they were good, both live and on Voodoo Lounge (although the album isnt great it has a couple of good songs). I enjoy parts of the 1998 tour and Bridges (thief in the night). So if they dont produce music what is there to speculate about? And cmon, Keith and the bandana? He looks cool now but he's sure had some bad years. And the man used to be the coolest guy on earth in the 70s early 80s. A huge weight to carry.
-------------------------------------------------------
> >> Specualtions about their lives is part of their
> fame. <<
>
> right. so what happened to "if the music was
> great all the time noone would care"?
> as noted above: one of the wonders of the internet
> is that folks post just any old idle notions,
> thoughtful or not, and it doesn't necessarily mean
> much, does it.
Yeah I should have edited that but who cares. The point is, when the magic is gone (it's still there now and then), when they are no longer "immortal rock gods" and yet go on year after year (nothing wrong with that) and their fame still monumental what is there to speculate about if they dont produce music. If they released good music or changed in some new direction re-fueled youd be busy enjoying them. Besides, gossip is easier on the internet. But remember when Love is strong was released. I loved it. It was the "real" stones again, a little danger, bluesy but not boring. I nag about their comeback years (1989-) but 1994-1995, they were good, both live and on Voodoo Lounge (although the album isnt great it has a couple of good songs). I enjoy parts of the 1998 tour and Bridges (thief in the night). So if they dont produce music what is there to speculate about? And cmon, Keith and the bandana? He looks cool now but he's sure had some bad years. And the man used to be the coolest guy on earth in the 70s early 80s. A huge weight to carry.
Re: insatiable
Posted by:
Adrian-L
()
Date: July 6, 2007 12:17
LA FORUM Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
And cmon, Keith and the bandana? He looks
> cool now but he's sure had some bad years.
he looks better in hats, than bandanas
-------------------------------------------------------
And cmon, Keith and the bandana? He looks
> cool now but he's sure had some bad years.
he looks better in hats, than bandanas
Re: Keith this and Keith that ...
Posted by:
King Snake
()
Date: July 8, 2007 21:15
Reminds me of that terrific April fools joke, \"Keith died\".
Re: Keith this and Keith that ...
Posted by:
Beelyboy
()
Date: July 11, 2007 02:33
he hee, what the hell is a pic of keith doing in this prominet scientific piece....haawww, always a good bad example i guess...
jeeesh...
[www.eontarionow.com]
jeeesh...
[www.eontarionow.com]
Re: Something is really wrong with Keith
Posted by:
Adrian-L
()
Date: August 2, 2007 17:05
Bob05 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Those among us denying that there is "something"
> wrong with our hero sure have difficulties in
> listening and watching correctly.
mixed reviews from Finland - though 'Keith falling over'
is worrying, if its accurate.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Those among us denying that there is "something"
> wrong with our hero sure have difficulties in
> listening and watching correctly.
mixed reviews from Finland - though 'Keith falling over'
is worrying, if its accurate.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.