Finally, would it be that stupid to imagine that Keith needs some rest for health problems (see his evolution the past two years....) , and that Mick Taylor joins the band to start a new tour in 2009 ?!!!

oh.. behave..

NO WAY!

'Doo doo doo Heartbreaker'

what are you talkin about?


And I'm sick of all this kind of thread titles, just to get attention.
This has NOT happened and will not happen. So why not "What if mick taylor joins.."
If I open a thread to say that to me Keith doesn't look so healthy, i wouldn't call it "KEITH IS DEAD".



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-06-20 13:33 by farawayeyes2.

Oh come on, that's exactly what was missing in this discussion... Mick Taylor... Ronnie is back on form, let's replace the other guitarplayer with Mick Taylor... I've heared Keith was back on track again in Lyon, so to start with: you're LATE!!!!!!

What do you suggest tomorrow? To replace Jagger or Charlie for Taylor?

The guy quit more than 30 years ago, please play Ya-Ya's if you want to listen to this guy and visit a show if you want to see The Rolling Stones.

Jelle

PHILMAG Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Keith retired, and Mick Taylor back !!!!

No way!!!! You banned would be a good option though.

JumpingKentFlash

can't they draft in that Macca guy? or David Lee Roth?

I think Keith´s health benefits from being on the road. Besides, I don´t think MT is in top form either...

Yeah right ! And suddenly Brian Jones is alive again



It´s Only Rock´n Roll



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-06-20 13:46 by Harlix.

another useless thread that should be deleted. it´s not keith that has mental probs.

JumpingKentFlash Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> PHILMAG Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> No way!!!! You banned would be a good option
> though.


Agreed 100%

I WOULD RATHER DYING RIGHT NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How dare you ?

KEITH is the STONES.

Taylor plays craps this times. I saw him live, mostly trying to find the good level for his amp during all the show rather than play; BORING !!

I WOULD RATHER DYING RIGHT NOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

provocation.

KEITH is the STONES as the rest of the band. If Keith were gone it would have no sense to replace him, the Stones would be ended, that's all.

Taylor plays craps this times. I saw him live, mostly trying to find the good level for his amp during all the show rather than play; BORING !!

Pfff if you're brave enough to start a thread like this, at least be brave enough to stick around and defend yourself/endure the comments you get... Or explain what you want to achieve with your topic... A topic like this, AND deserted by its initiator, isn't worth keeping...

Jelle

Now the David Lee Roth idea sounds great!

No Keith = No Stones

toomuchforme Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Taylor plays craps this times.


With all due respect, he doesn't. I saw him last year, and he did well (Though drunk). The fact that what he played weren't exactly my cup of tea, is another story.

JumpingKentFlash

As I said in another thread Mick T could only be added but never replace Keith.

Please, lets noy go there again! It aint EVER gonna happen!

What pointless topic. God knows why I have even bothered to reply. I must be bored.

NickB

sluissie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Pfff if you're brave enough to start a thread like
> this, at least be brave enough to stick around and
> defend yourself/endure the comments you get... Or
> explain what you want to achieve with your
> topic... A topic like this, AND deserted by its
> initiator, isn't worth keeping...
>
> Jelle


Lol. Everybody responds and pretends to be upset.

Oh well, I really have no problem admitting that nonsense like that upsets me.

I think we all have things we cannot resist reacting on... I don't think you'll deny that...

This might be the most upsetting thing I've ever read! I take it it's a bad joke from someone who did not see the shows in Paris, Lyon and Nijmegen. Keith's just great. He's doing really well, after a start that was a bit rusty. But now he's on fire. The Stones without Keith - it's a sick joke. Yes, I did get upset.

This is probably the most stupid comment I have seen this week. I don't know anything about guitar playing but I am 100% sure the way Keith is playing the guitar is not possible to replace by anybody. Mick Taylor is a blues guitarist and certainly not Keith Richards.

It would be the same as replacing your wife with someone else who do decent home work. Totally totally meaningless way of thinking.

Bjornulf

keith are the rolling stones.Without keith,no stones !!

BV - don't agree with your comment that Taylor couldn't fill in for Richards.
Taylor & Richards BOTH played rhythm while the other took leads in songs like:
Bitch, Midnight Rambler,etc. While I'm not agreeing with the opinion:

Retire Keith and let Taylor replace him. I still think "adding" Taylor to the
mix would "help" not "hurt" the current Stones sound!!!

And I think you would see much different Mick Taylor than what we have seen
lately in his small club gigs. Jagger knows how to get to most out of him.

MLC

Am I missing something.
Mick Taylor left and I am sure if there would have been opportunities there would have been. But it is WOULD and not done.
Keith, Mick, Charlie and Ronnie and for a long time Bill have made the Rolling Stones. Now it's the four with another 9 musicians and we have to take it for grant that it's a big band. One can argue if this is better or not, but at last there are out there.

PHILMAG has a point.

he allowed us to show our total faithfullness to Keith

Lodge,

Taylor has asked many times to sit-in with the boys so the "opportunities"
have been there. Taylor has been "Black-Balled" because he dared to cross
Mr. Jagger, once you piss MJ off, he holds a grudge for a long time..

MLC

"Retire Keith and let Taylor replace him. I still think "adding" Taylor to the
mix would "help" not "hurt" the current Stones sound!!! "

But that would mean "three" guitars on stage not including Blondie and Bass???