Re: O.T Switch to 0.11 strings?
Date: May 14, 2007 15:07
10, 13, 17, 26, 36, 46.
i use 'earnie ball') hybrid slinkys (guages above) and get a bit of the best of both worlds. (i had started out with 'reg.' slinkys.)
11, 14, 18p, 28, 38, 48.
these are the guages for 'regular' slinkys, if you want to get a bit more of string in there.
i've been playing tons of acoustic lately, including lead work, which allows me to strengthen my fingers and reall dig deep for vibrato on lead work...
(e- .012
B- .016
G- .024
D- .032
A- .042
E- .053 )
is a typical setup for 'light guage acoustic' strings...
...then when i pick up my electric or acoustic-electric it's amazing how effortless it feels and how thin even the hybrid slinks seem...the acoustic is my not so secret weapon for really being able to almost efforlessly finger any chord on lead figure with authority on my electrics...
(it does feel real good to me, after a period of sustained adjustment, to be able to really wrangle those heavy guage acoustic strings and make everything work...when you've got it on acoustic, you've got it on everything else.
this is the guage for 'extra' slinkys...which is probably similar to your current setup:
9, 11, 16, 24, 32, 42. i used to use 'em but switched to hybrids many many years ago.
they have 'super' slinkys too, starting with the e string at '8' but i like a little more pull personally. and the tone is fatter with heavier strings imo.
as you can see by the various slinky (and other manufacturers' range of guage offereings, it's no crime to customize a guage that works for you...ernie ball usually will sell single strings in various guages in most guitar shops...
you just wouldn't want to radically change your guages as it might affect basic 'setup' and intonation at various frets...or perhaps be a mite too radical a change (in one changing) for the neck in some cases...a pro 'setup' and intonation in these regards never hurts and they are not expensive and well worth it.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-05-14 15:14 by Beelyboy.