Here's the link:

[bandmadness.net]

It's 51% for Nirvana to 49% for the Stones !!!...

Done.

Done, but Nirvana is still ahead :-(

Led Zep V Johnny Cash


Eh??????

lets vote..can only vote once....need more votes for the STONES

i did! but then again who cares? ha..i still voted...

Bugger - hit the wrong one! Nevermind......



(get it?)

Let's speak about it on all Stones message boards too!

done..now the stones are first..

yes, 11 votes!!

Yes, but it's only 50/50 %...

voted too


Belgrade-Bucharest-Budapest-Brno

ablett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Led Zep V Johnny Cash
>
>
> Eh??????


jonnhy just got my vote. much love to him.

How can anyone reta Nirvana over the Stones? That's ridiculous!!! Voted!

ablett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bugger - hit the wrong one! Nevermind......
>
>
>
> (get it?)


Pffft! Traitor! Lol

Elton john vs Dave Mattews band


where's the third option?

Not even close to compare...but this site does indicate their own demographic audience I guess....

done

Stones are now ahead.

Voted!

Voted! We're WAY ahead - but keep voting!

49/50 for the Stones! He he...

All those of us who have several logging-ins on our computer
might be able to vote more?

Done ;-)

Voted!

The Doors vs Dave Matthews Band!!!!

Give me a goddamn break, please.

Baboon Bro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> All those of us who have several logging-ins on
> our computer
> might be able to vote more?


No, ha ha - that didn't work. But I tried. Guess it's IP-sensitive or "sees" us in some way.

The Stones Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Voted!
>
> The Doors vs Dave Matthews Band!!!!
>
> Give me a goddamn break, please.

To me Nirvanna was one of those bands that was ten percent talent and ninety percent image. Ridiculous for them to be even mentioned in the same breath as The Stones.

I would like for one of these dopes that voted for Nirvanna to show me one tangible or intangible category that Nirvanna was better in. Chart hits? Album Sales? Influnece on future generations?
Musical range? Huge tours? Contibution to pop culture? Number one albums? Gold and platinum records? I could list dozens of categories and Nirvanna would be lucky to best The Stones in one.

As someone else pointed out all these results show is the demographic that uses that website.

They werent better in any sense.
But there is a similarity:
They both started something new.
After that I reckon we've run out of similarities.

Done my duty

Stones got 127 more votes at the moment