W/o a doubt one of the FUNNIEST SNL skits ever--thanks for posting.

Yeah, lurv it!

Thanks for posting this...
I've been looking for this one on youtube without any luck...

see it while you can, before the p-cock yanks it

True--NBC will get this off quick--check it out while you can

great to finally see all of it! you ignorant slut -
thanks z!

I suggest that you download this one before it's gone... if you want to be able to see it again some day.

Review this thread:
[www.iorr.org].

Glass Slide Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> True--NBC will get this off quick--check it out
> while you can



is that why i have never found it before?

this is a classic. i see it was only posted yesterday, hopefully it wil last long enough for me to let everyone know who i have told about it, a chance to actually see it!

Glass Slide Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> W/o a doubt one of the FUNNIEST SNL skits
> ever--thanks for posting.


Clever maybe, but one of the funniest ever? Hardly....

Really? Oh c'mon, I thought watching Mick do a dead on impression of Keith was one of the funniest things I have ever seen, on any show, so, imo, it qualifies!


Half Nanker--absolutely--NBC as do probably all the major networks, gets very protective of their copyrighted material and no doubt once this is brought to their attention it will come down--pronto.

THANK YOU for posting this!! I spent hours searching for this a few months back.

Hey, I just bought the Mike Meyers edition of the SNL Best Of series (or called somtheing like that) DVD for $5 about Xmas and it includes that piece as well as a Ronnie Wood piece which is not as funny,

Check your Targets and Walmarts, it may still be out there


Plexi

Been looking for this skit for a long time,THANKS for posting

If the description of the video at the Youtube site read "Courtesy NBC", I suspect that would probably keep a TV network from bothering to try to remove the video.

I put "courtesy PBS" on a video's description that I put on Youtube. Yes, ok... PBS and NBC are very different. But the fair-use issue regarding copyrighted material is the same regardless.

Mick as himself, Jimmy Fallon as his reflection:

[vids.myspace.com]




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-02-09 19:08 by schillid.

schillid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If the description of the video at the Youtube
> site read "Courtesy NBC", I suspect that would
> probably keep a TV network from bothering to try
> to remove the video.
>
> I put "courtesy PBS" on a video's description that
> I put on Youtube. Yes, ok... PBS and NBC are very
> different. But the fair-use issue regarding
> copyrighted material is the same regardless.


This in no way, shape or form falls under "fair use".

An example of "fair use" would be taping a cd you purchased so you could listen to the tape in your car.

Posting on YouTube is a whole other kettle of fish--that is why when they "pull" videos they refer to the fact that is "copyrighted" and the holder of the copyright "requested" (really demanded) that it be taken down.

Fair use is not irrelevant.

Suppose a tv news story about superbowl commercials uses a few seconds of an ad in a segment... this would be considered a "fair use" of the copyrighted ad. The news organization may wish to furher protect itself by putting "Courtesy Pepsi" on the screen. Sometimes, the insulation against infringement allegation goes even further: The graphics for the news story about Superbowl ads on tv might have the commercials themselves inserted into a graphic of a tv screen, for example.

If you think posting an SNL skit on YouTube is covered by the doctorine of "fair use"............ Umm, "lots of luck", to use legal parlance.



I wish you well in making this (specious) "argument" to NBC's lawyers, let me know how you make out. I hope you prevail, my preference would be that it stays up.

schillid Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mick as himself, Jimmy Fallon as his reflection:
>
> [vids.myspace.com].
> individual&videoid=1511506298

This one is simply excellent

Yes... don't even bother to fight against NBC's lawyers. Which is to say, GE's lawyers. They have limitless financial resouces to outlast almost ANY legal challenges.

But I don't think that it is a "specious argument", Just the same. I would not take anyone to court if they yank the video!

Well, apart from financial resources, in this instance, they also happen to have the law on their side---a far more formidable obstacle.

What if on Youtube... the SNL video was shown inside a graphic of a TV screen, and type on that TV graphic reads "As seen on NBC-TV"?

Would that be fairer use?

In a word........no.

It is not a matter of correctly/properly asserting the origin, rather it is an infringement of NBC's copyright.

Perhaps...

I respect your opinion.

Well, thanks--I would prefer to be wrong on this since I have seen things on YouTube I would never see anywhere else.

If someone took one of your drawings and put it on their profit-generating web site you might not placated by the fact they acknowledge that you drew it---you might want to see some financial benefit from it,or have the right to decide who can use it; afterall it is your creation and someone w/o your permission is making money from it and/or using it w/o your permission. Perhaps not the best analogy, but I think you get the idea.

As I said, I love that clip and hope it stays up. Personally I think the networks are being kill-joys about the whole thing, but I suppose that is easy for me to say since I have no responsibility to their bottom line or shareholders.

LOL

Jimmy Fallon kind of pissed me off. I mean he was funny sometimes, but a) he laughed out loud or goofed off out of character in nearly every skit b)he was too derivative of Adam Sandler c) he always ended up making out with every hot actress host who appeared on the show d) it pretty much became the Jimmy Fallon Show after Will Ferrel left - which is when I stopped watching it after so many years.

Is it funny now again, or is it still a bunch of PC no-namers?

Funny!

any guesses on the translation to that "song" they were "working on"?

Keith Richards: Mick.. you ignorant slut! All the time, you liberal claptrap.. [ mumbles unintelligibly ]

Mick Jagger: That wasn't English, Keith! I mean, you're talking in Esperanto, or some language twins teach each other! I mean, the King's English, man! I mean, throw us a bone man - alright!

Keith Richards: Listen, man, you're going sillin' go with the goin' bean!

Mick Jagger: What's that?

Keith Richards: You're gonna sillin' go with the goin' bean.

Mick Jagger: [ singing ] "You're gonna sillin' go with the goin' bean."

Mick & Keith: [ singing together ] "You're gonna sillin' go with the goin' bean. You're gonna sillin' go with the goin' bean."

Keith Richards: No, "Man."

Mick Jagger: You don't like the "Man"? It's great, though. Just invert it, Keith.

Mick & Keith: [ singing together ] "Sillin' go with the goin' bean. Sillin' go with the goin' bean