Mack Jigger Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tralala Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > No tongues! Remember what Bjørnulf said: The
> > Stones-lawyers are just waiting for an
> opportunity
> > to teach us a lesson.
>
> The tongue made by William Stout is to diverse
> from the official Stones tongue to give any legal
> problems. (This is not the case if a design is
> used by the Stones themselves like for example the
> 1973 winter tour tongue).
>
> If the design looks almost the same it gives the
> Stones lawyers enough reasons to sue, but with
> this tongue design they won't have a strong case
> and they know it.
>
> [
i21.photobucket.com]
> /tongues.jpg
It's the combination "Stones and tongue" that makes this a legal matter, not quite as black and white as you see it. As long as it's obvious that someone uses a logo, modified or not, to identify with the owner of the logo... They're in deep s**t. So, therefore - no tongue.