For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
GasLightStreet
Very long story short, going by memory, U2 was hoping for Phillips, the CD inventor (?) to foot the bill for a giant video screen for 1992-93 ZOOTV tours.
No.
U2 worked around it elsewise and include a B-stage at some point.
1994... The Rolling Stones have a video screen on stage similar to what U2 was hoping to do... and a rolling B-stage.
1997 (I do not recall if Pink Floyd was involved) the Stones dial the onstage media back and have a more central location... while U2 lights up a giant grocery cart.
Etc blah blah blah.
The greatest stage ever, that I've witnessed, was U2's 2017 THE JOUSHA TREE tour. What they did in 2017 onward... wow.
They work with the same people the Stones work with.
No Stones stage has ever come close. NO SECURITY was very cool. Maybe their best. That's a difficult area but in regard to video quality etc way better than VOODOO or BRIDGES (BANG was terrible).
With U2 at the Sphere perhaps the (US) football stadium experience will be better than pre-2020 with the Stones and whoever else (that can afford it, anyway).
Quote
Stoneage
It doesn't matter. Just turn up and play. We're lucky if they can do just that. Don't expect to much, they are plus 80 now. The stage is of non importance whatsoever.
Quote
dedospegajosos
something simple like just a base with a few catwalks and a huge screen
Quote
IrixQuote
dedospegajosos
something simple like just a base with a few catwalks and a huge screen
Like Taylor Swift's current stage?
Quote
slewan
the Stones should get rid of the cheap looking and concert goer unfriendly Sixty stage and return to the No Filter stage
Quote
GasLightStreet
I really liked the NO FILTER stage. Simple, big enough, it was elegant, actually.
Quote
slewan
the Stones should get rid of the cheap looking and concert goer unfriendly Sixty stage and return to the No Filter stage
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
slewan
the Stones should get rid of the cheap looking and concert goer unfriendly Sixty stage and return to the No Filter stage
I never understood that. It was a huge reverse in technology. Perhaps things just weren't available - or, were not affordable enough.
Quote
stonesurvive
The "Sixty" stage was obviously a money-saver
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
slewan
the Stones should get rid of the cheap looking and concert goer unfriendly Sixty stage and return to the No Filter stage
I never understood that. It was a huge reverse in technology. Perhaps things just weren't available - or, were not affordable enough.
Quote
Rockman
Up their game .....
You mean like more beef in Keef's shepherds pie .......
Quote
slew
I'd like to see something different on this tour not over the top but something. The ticketsa are expensive so let's have a big stage
Quote
Rockman
Up their game .....
You mean like more beef in Keef's shepherds pie .......