For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
1962
I can only listen to four tracks: the two singles (both very good), Keith's track (quite good), and the blues (which is not bad).
All the other crap is Mick's solo record-like garbage.
I don't understand why it was necessary to release an album.
Of course I know, because Mick wanted it and old Keith agreed for the sake of peace.
(And I haven't even mentioned the rhythm section yet. Oh my God! Charlie!)
There are two real Rolling Stones quality tracks, the two singles.
But the campaign was in true Rolling Stones style, I liked it!
Quote
DoxaQuote
1962
I can only listen to four tracks: the two singles (both very good), Keith's track (quite good), and the blues (which is not bad).
All the other crap is Mick's solo record-like garbage.
I don't understand why it was necessary to release an album.
Of course I know, because Mick wanted it and old Keith agreed for the sake of peace.
(And I haven't even mentioned the rhythm section yet. Oh my God! Charlie!)
There are two real Rolling Stones quality tracks, the two singles.
But the campaign was in true Rolling Stones style, I liked it!
It is not that difficult to understand. Artists do that sometimes. It's a free world, and neither is neceesary for anyone to listen it.
- Doxa
Quote
1962Quote
DoxaQuote
1962
I can only listen to four tracks: the two singles (both very good), Keith's track (quite good), and the blues (which is not bad).
All the other crap is Mick's solo record-like garbage.
I don't understand why it was necessary to release an album.
Of course I know, because Mick wanted it and old Keith agreed for the sake of peace.
(And I haven't even mentioned the rhythm section yet. Oh my God! Charlie!)
There are two real Rolling Stones quality tracks, the two singles.
But the campaign was in true Rolling Stones style, I liked it!
It is not that difficult to understand. Artists do that sometimes. It's a free world, and neither is neceesary for anyone to listen it.
- Doxa
Of course, I just don't understand why unworthy content had to be added to the great Rolling Stones catalog.
Quote
1962
Sorry, I won't spoil the air any more.
I listen to those 3-4 tracks, especially the two singles, and enjoy them.
Quote
jahisnotdead
Here's hoping the Stones get the cover of the US Rolling Stone, but I won't be surprised if they don't. I like Rolling Stone, but it's clear the US version is trying to focus on the younger crowd now.
I've been taking a break from HD for a few days, in anticipation for a little listening party tonight after I get my physical copies! Totally psyched.
Quote
Irix
"The Rolling Stones with best album start in 2023 at number 1"
"Three years ago, The Rolling Stones achieved a record in the Official German Charts as the oldest artists ever to sit on the throne of the single hit list. Now the music legends have gone one better - and achieved several records at once with their new album: 'Hackney Diamonds' not only landed the most successful start of the year in Germany, the most successful start since Rammstein's 'Zeit' one and a half years ago and the strongest start by an international artist since ABBA's 'Voyage' two years ago, but also the best-selling vinyl in the launch week to date. What's more, the album marks Mick Jagger & Co.'s eleventh number one record overall." - [www.OffizielleCharts.de] .
Quote
georgelicks
#1 in France with 43,410 copies
[www.chartsinfrance.net]
Also #1 in Australia and #5 in Japan with 28,230 sales.
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
jahisnotdead
Here's hoping the Stones get the cover of the US Rolling Stone, but I won't be surprised if they don't. I like Rolling Stone, but it's clear the US version is trying to focus on the younger crowd now.
I've been taking a break from HD for a few days, in anticipation for a little listening party tonight after I get my physical copies! Totally psyched.
If they want to move physical copies of the magazine (and I have no idea if that's even their business model anymore), having them on the cover is guaranteed to move product. Look at all the physical copies of media we're willing to buy.
I haven't bought a copy of Rolling Stone in over 2 decades, but I would buy if they're on the cover now.
Quote
1962
Or maybe it's a part of aging.
Quote
georgelicks
#1 in France with 43,410 copies
[www.chartsinfrance.net]
Also #1 in Australia and #5 in Japan with 28,230 sales.
Quote
Bashlets
And number 1 in Ireland
Quote
HardRiffinQuote
georgelicks
#1 in France with 43,410 copies
[www.chartsinfrance.net]
Also #1 in Australia and #5 in Japan with 28,230 sales.
Hi GL!!
Do you think it can reach number 1 in the UK? Regarding the US, it would already be a great achievement to enter the top 5.