For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
RollingFreak
I'm shocked its not playing at like midnight or something.
Quote
loog droogQuote
RollingFreak
I'm shocked its not playing at like midnight or something.
Really? The target audience is 60+ years old. Way past their bedtime.
Quote
lem motlow
This is where for the 1000th time Lem Motlow says-
For the love of all things good and holy will the Stones please
appoint a curator to gather all the film footage.the outtakes, the news reels etc and preserve it.
They did such a great job with “Charlie is my Darling “ and then .... nothing.
You could probably get anyone from Video James to Scorsese to do it for free.
It makes no sense/
When Jimmy Page went back through the old Zep stuff he said they lost some footage because of the old tape disintegrating, you can’t wait forever.
Yet the Stones just let so much of their history just disappear.
Quote
Taylor1
Why is the movie’s film quality so poor? It is blurry and the color is horrible and rinsed out.The performance snippets are great.The Street Fighting Man Clipfrom NYC makes me wish that somewhere in a vault there is the full concert.But too bad the quality of the film isn’t at the level of the Beatles Let It Be
I saw a screening of it at the Metropolitan Museum of art about 10 years ago and the quality of the film was just as bad as the bootlegs.Plus the backstage stuff is gross and boring.What Is like to know is what happpened to the complete performances of the songs like Akl down the LineQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Taylor1
Why is the movie’s film quality so poor? It is blurry and the color is horrible and rinsed out.The performance snippets are great.The Street Fighting Man Clipfrom NYC makes me wish that somewhere in a vault there is the full concert.But too bad the quality of the film isn’t at the level of the Beatles Let It Be
Have you seen the actual film, or a 15th generation bootleg, like me?
I would think Frank's copy is better.
Quote
Taylor1I saw a screening of it at the Metropolitan Museum of art about 10 years ago and the quality of the film was just as bad as the bootlegs.Plus the backstage stuff is gross and boring.What Is like to know is what happpened to the complete performances of the songs like Akl down the LineQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Taylor1
Why is the movie’s film quality so poor? It is blurry and the color is horrible and rinsed out.The performance snippets are great.The Street Fighting Man Clipfrom NYC makes me wish that somewhere in a vault there is the full concert.But too bad the quality of the film isn’t at the level of the Beatles Let It Be
Have you seen the actual film, or a 15th generation bootleg, like me?
I would think Frank's copy is better.
Quote
Taylor1
I saw a screening of it at the Metropolitan Museum of art about 10 years ago and the quality of the film was just as bad as the bootlegs.
Quote
jbwelda
The backstage stuff was gross and boring? The image quality was poor?
Quote
Nikkei
Ok there's Keef with the TV set what else
Quote
jbwelda
Bobby Keys with the TV set. Saw somewhere someone asked him about it and he said, you know, I have forty years in show biz and that's all people remember me for..."hey you were the guy threw the tv out the window".
I liked all the behind the scenes stuff, staged or not. Eating the groupie on the plane? priceless. you aint gonna get that sort of "real" these days that's for sure, everyone is busy covering their butt so they get a nice word on their grave stone, that aint what I dug about the Stones that's for sure. Five minutes of CS Blues is better, for me, than all the live crap they have put out the last forty years, or thirty at best. But evidently, it is just me. Again.
jb
Quote
Taylor1
Why is the movie’s film quality so poor? It is blurry and the color is horrible and rinsed out.The performance snippets are great.The Street Fighting Man Clipfrom NYC makes me wish that somewhere in a vault there is the full concert.But too bad the quality of the film isn’t at the level of the Beatles Let It Be