For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
SiciQuote
MisterDDDD
"In Italy, 9.5% of the people who have tested positive for the virus have succumbed to COVID-19,
The biggest reason for the difference, infectious disease experts say, is Germany’s work in the early days of its outbreak to track, test and contain infection clusters.
Right,
in Italy the test is only for those who arrive at the hospital, for that the percentage is high
Sici
Quote
Chris Fountain
I just purchased 10k in Disney Stock and will be looking for deals tomorrow. This is just another media frenzied event that does not support anyone other than the reporter itself.
Go out run, exercise - we all go back to work in a week or two. Some bank stocks may be on the horizon
Quote
MisterDDDD
Why Germany’s coronavirus death rate is so much lower than other countries’ rates
"In Italy, 9.5% of the people who have tested positive for the virus have succumbed to COVID-19, according to data compiled at the Johns Hopkins University. In France, the rate is 4.3%. But in Germany, it’s 0.4%.
The biggest reason for the difference, infectious disease experts say, is Germany’s work in the early days of its outbreak to track, test and contain infection clusters. That means Germany has a truer picture of the size of its outbreak than places that test only the obviously symptomatic, most seriously ill or highest-risk patients."
[www.seattletimes.com]
Quote
Happy24
Tough when I look at our country, we have about 1500 cases and 3 dearts so far - people aged 71 - 95 years, all three with other serious issues. Even the pannic spreading media admit that the coronavirus might not have been the cause of their deaths.
Our country has had very poor testing so far. I have no idea where we stand between Germany and Italy, but tons of people want to be testet and they are not, those who are wait many days for results. Yet the death rate is extrelemy low (or has been so far).
Our country is one of those with hardest rules from the very beginning, the whole country has been in quarantine for 10 days now. It very often looks like what our pro-Russian leaders are mainly doing is testing, how people would react. Three days ago our "leader" announced, that the borders might be closed for another 2 years, which I think is totally outrageous to say now, when we are about 2 weeks into this and nobody knows what it is and where it is going to lead us. It looks like they are testing how people would react if they decided for us to go back 30 years...and The Wall would be built again... Which I see as a possible scenario unfortunately. Many many people on the internet shout that it should have always been thet way.
I wonder how is the situation in Sweden? If I get it correcly (which I maybe don't), I think the restrictions are not very hard and judging purely from the statistics it looks, like the country is doing pretty mus as well / bad as any other country with hard restrictions. Of course, we are only very short time into this and time will tell.
But back to Italy. I still feel like there might be something into that article I posted a few days ago about flu epidemics in Italy, which says, that "Italy showed a higher influenza attributable excess mortality compared to other European countries. especially in the elderly." I know, it is a long shot to assume that the same applies for the coronavirus, but it is true, that the death rate differs quite dramatiacly in different countries, Italy being the most obviouse case. I don't know. I guess we will know more in the future.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Three people at the office infected now.
I'm still not feeling any symptoms, luckily. The chemo cure I did in october wiped away all the vaccines I've taken through life, so I'm waiting for a pneumonia vaccine. It helps a bit if I get pnemonia, but not for the coronavirus per se.
One day left of the max incubation period. Fingers crossed
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Three people at the office infected now.
I'm still not feeling any symptoms, luckily. The chemo cure I did in october wiped away all the vaccines I've taken through life, so I'm waiting for a pneumonia vaccine. It helps a bit if I get pnemonia, but not for the coronavirus per se.
One day left of the max incubation period. Fingers crossed
Quote
windmelody
If you go out running or if you are taking a stroll you do not put anybody in danger, if you keep a distance; you can strengthen your immune system that way. This is a serious situation, which needs to be handled in a well balanced way: If you lock up everybody, the numbers of heart attacks, strokes and suicides will increase rapidly and kill many people. Certain restrictions are sensible, but hysteria is not helpful.
Quote
MaindefenderQuote
windmelody
If you go out running or if you are taking a stroll you do not put anybody in danger, if you keep a distance; you can strengthen your immune system that way. This is a serious situation, which needs to be handled in a well balanced way: If you lock up everybody, the numbers of heart attacks, strokes and suicides will increase rapidly and kill many people. Certain restrictions are sensible, but hysteria is not helpful.
Agreed. I live in a rural area and it's good to go for a run to test yourself and physically and mentally stay stronger. I'm no saint, 14 of us went on a golf trip to Las Vegas the week of 3/2. To this date no one has taken ill so we dodged a bullet, none of us have underlying conditions.
Quote
MaindefenderQuote
windmelody
If you go out running or if you are taking a stroll you do not put anybody in danger, if you keep a distance; you can strengthen your immune system that way. This is a serious situation, which needs to be handled in a well balanced way: If you lock up everybody, the numbers of heart attacks, strokes and suicides will increase rapidly and kill many people. Certain restrictions are sensible, but hysteria is not helpful.
Agreed. I live in a rural area and it's good to go for a run to test yourself and physically and mentally stay stronger. I'm no saint, 14 of us went on a golf trip to Las Vegas the week of 3/2. To this date no one has taken ill so we dodged a bullet, none of us have underlying conditions.
Quote
MaindefenderQuote
windmelody
If you go out running or if you are taking a stroll you do not put anybody in danger, if you keep a distance; you can strengthen your immune system that way. This is a serious situation, which needs to be handled in a well balanced way: If you lock up everybody, the numbers of heart attacks, strokes and suicides will increase rapidly and kill many people. Certain restrictions are sensible, but hysteria is not helpful.
Agreed. I live in a rural area and it's good to go for a run to test yourself and physically and mentally stay stronger. I'm no saint, 14 of us went on a golf trip to Las Vegas the week of 3/2. To this date no one has taken ill so we dodged a bullet, none of us have underlying conditions.
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
CaptainCorellaQuote
treaclefingers
OK, in a day of already bad news I'd like to point out a pretty negative trending stat of late, using [www.worldometers.info] as my source, which has been pretty good and usually quite uptodate.
[snip]
The rest of the world right now, aside from China, has 35000 that have recovered and 15610 deaths. So out of a total of just over 50000 outcomes, the death rate is 31%.
It’s astronomical and worse, it is getting higher every day.
Maybe there are explanations for that, like people that die, die sooner than people get completely resolved.
But I didn’t see that happening in China.
The Italian example right now has a death rate of 45% of outcomes. It’s eye watering. Even if EVERY SINGLE OTHER CASE in Italy resolved with a positive outcome right now (highly unlikely) you’d have a death rate of 9.9%. That is best case scenario. That is the SARS death rate, 10%, only it didn’t spread as quickly.
These are the numbers, I’m just doing some simple division, and anyone can check this for themselves.
The only thing that could bring these death rates down, is maybe way way more people have it already and are just not being counted, and I mean in Italy for example, by 10 fold. So 690000 cases instead of 69000 officially showing, so a death rate of 4.5%
Anyway, I just needed to get that out. Most people are taking this seriously but it’s too bad we have a few just not quite able to get it.
This is just so wrong it hurts. It's alarming and irresponsible.
If you go to the John Hopkins University site [www.arcgis.com] and look at the figures presented there you can get a good idea of what's going on.
It's important to look at the numbers carefully.
If you look at China, you'll see that there's a small difference between the total number of cases reported (on the one hand) and the sum of the total deaths and total recovered (on the other hand). That's because the more recent 5,000 or so have not been sorted out. Working with the numbers there you get a death rate of about 4.2%. Dreadful, but not the dangerously misleading figures quoted above. But, it's a good estimate because the China-phase seems to be over.
But if you look at, say, the Australia figures you'll see that because of the 'early' (my term) stage of the epidemic there have only been 8 deaths so far and 119 reported recoveries. So the apparent death rate is very low indeed - 0.3%. And that's skewed because there are so many cases that are still 'active', so a sensible estimate cannot be made.
The figures for Italy do not bear out the 45% claim above. There have been 69,176 cases and so far 6,820 deaths. That's a dreadful 10% rate. Even if you assume that every single one of the cases listed as 'Serious/Critical' (3,393) on [www.worldometers.info] results in death, that would bring the casualty figure up to 14%.
It's worth pointing out that the Italian figures are going to be atypical due to the average age of the population, plus a very strong local cultural resistance to seeking medical help ... until it's almost too late.
Countries with good 21st century public health systems will fare far better than those with an essentially private health system.
I think we've said exactly the same thing, and if you reread what I've said, you would understand that. All I've done is crunch the numbers as presented. The 45% 'claim' for Italy is the current number amongst outcomes. I never stated this is what I believe will be the ultimate number, only the number that is currently being presented, over a fairly large sampling size. I also extrapolated from that that likely 10x the number are actually infected, which then brings us closer to the China rate.
I get that you didn't read what I had originally written entirely, perhaps a little to long for you, but please don't quote excerpts and claim I have done something wrong, when in fact you just didn't understand because you didn't read everything.
We've even come to more or less the same conclusion...the only real point I was making was the trend was on a horrible course at the moment. And that trend was the first thing I quoted which was a 6% deathrate amongst overall outcomes, to 15% currently.
That is the stat that is the most current death rate amongst overall outcomes. If the true deathrate is say 4% overall, that means that the number of cases worldwide is being underestimated by a factor of 4. There are probably 4x as many cases out there undiagnosed. That makes sense because we know not everyone gets a test.
Quote
MisterDDDD
An actual billionaire that understands science and facts.
He's estimating the length of shutdown needed at six to ten weeks, provided there's an increase of testing etc.
Bill Gates says the US missed its chance to avoid coronavirus shutdown and businesses should stay closed
“The U.S. is past this opportunity to control (COVID-19) without shutdown,” Gates said during a TED Connects program broadcast online.
“We did not act fast enough to have an ability to avoid the shutdown.”
“It’s January when everybody should’ve been on notice,” Gates added. The virus was first discovered in December in China."
[www.cnbc.com]