For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Deltics
Too little, too late.
Can't say I was particularly taken by the ‘Audio Source Separation’ either.
This from Zentgraf:
Listed above are the recording dates (the album lists the airing dates). Hi-
Heel Sneakers, Walking The Dog, Ain’t That Loving You Baby and I Just
Want To Make Love To You are misdated on the album's sleeve notes.
Come On, Hi-Heel Sneakers and Ain't That Loving You Baby are
incomplete. Hi-Heel Sneakers is clearly taken from a bootleg source, as it
has a part from the second refrain edited into the first refrain (as it appeared
on a couple of bootlegs, probably to fix a flaw).
The complete "High Heel Sneakers":
[www.youtube.com]
Quote
Happy JackQuote
Deltics
Too little, too late.
Can't say I was particularly taken by the ‘Audio Source Separation’ either.
This from Zentgraf:
Listed above are the recording dates (the album lists the airing dates). Hi-
Heel Sneakers, Walking The Dog, Ain’t That Loving You Baby and I Just
Want To Make Love To You are misdated on the album's sleeve notes.
Come On, Hi-Heel Sneakers and Ain't That Loving You Baby are
incomplete. Hi-Heel Sneakers is clearly taken from a bootleg source, as it
has a part from the second refrain edited into the first refrain (as it appeared
on a couple of bootlegs, probably to fix a flaw).
The complete "High Heel Sneakers":
[www.youtube.com]
Where is the complete version from? Even the assblaster Boot is not complete.
Quote
Big Al
Whilst it was certainly nice that their session for BBC Radio finally received an official release, I just cannot help but compare it to the terrific, Beatles at the BBC release from 1994. The Beatles' set was expertly researched and the audio-quality near-perfect on the majority of recordings. Yes, the Stones' set has some excellent-sounding recordings, though it also features - for me - too many of so-so quality. I was a little disappointed with the set, truthfully. The set wasn't lavished with the love and care that the Beatles were afforded.
Exactly. It is not about the music but about representation of material. Although, I still think that chronological order would let smoother flow of that release.Quote
DoxaQuote
Big Al
Whilst it was certainly nice that their session for BBC Radio finally received an official release, I just cannot help but compare it to the terrific, Beatles at the BBC release from 1994. The Beatles' set was expertly researched and the audio-quality near-perfect on the majority of recordings. Yes, the Stones' set has some excellent-sounding recordings, though it also features - for me - too many of so-so quality. I was a little disappointed with the set, truthfully. The set wasn't lavished with the love and care that the Beatles were afforded.
It could be that anything concerning the Stones is never "lavished with the love and care". It's just not their style. There is always a certain feel 'yeah, this could be done better but we can't give a flying...'. For die-hard collectors and historians this sloppiness/intentional arrogance is a bit annoying, I am sure.
My band.
- Doxa
Quote
rollmops
I have listened to it repeatdelty in the past and I enjoyed it a lot. It is R&B rather than R&R. It is what Sam Philips was looking for; the perfect imperfection or the antithesis of the Beatles' music.
Rockandroll,
Mops