For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
duke richardson
Keith should regret all the times Bill showed up on time to work while Keith couldnt get out of bed...
3. not enough MSGQuote
potus43
Hopefully. 1Gouging pricing and2. bad set lists
Quote
Phil Good
Stu
Brian
Mick T
Quote
TheflyingDutchmanQuote
Phil Good
Stu
Brian
Mick T
Please explain.
I have a hard time believing that Keith actually believed that he got creativity from Da Junk . I think (like many of us do ) that he enjoyed getting high and not that there is anything wrong with that and far be it from me to judge because that is such a personal choice ,but to actually think that Da junk inspires creativity is pure bollocks . Ditto for Da Junk making you play your instrument better or sing better is pure fantasy .Quote
BlissQuote
keefriff99All we can go by is public persona, and so much of that is a put-on. Who knows if he's ever attempted to make amends behind the scene, yet insisted on putting on a defiant "no regrets" facade in interviews.Quote
Stoneage
Sure, Bliss. But isn't that narcissism? I mean, he doesn't seem to take in consideration how it affected other members of the group.
I think the truth lies somewhere in the middle. Keith's heroin honeymoon coincided with his most creative period, and the band may not have risen to the heights it did without that impetus. So he may not have any regrets on that score.
But he did state that it went on too long; long after it had any beneficial effect on his work and the group, and he did regret that.
Quote
Phil Good
Stu
Brian
Mick T
Quote
dcba
The sacking of Stu opened the door for the lovely super-talented Nicky Hopkins.
Agree, they may regret that especially after Morrison's rebuke.Quote
dgodkin
they should have very few regrets, its life shit happens, what a great run,only maybe small regret, would be changing the words to lets spend the night together, to appease ed Sullivan, that's the one thing I give morrison props for he didnt
Quote
bv
No. No regrets.
Quote
MisterDDDDAgree, they may regret that especially after Morrison's rebuke.Quote
dgodkin
they should have very few regrets, its life shit happens, what a great run,only maybe small regret, would be changing the words to lets spend the night together, to appease ed Sullivan, that's the one thing I give morrison props for he didnt
In their defense, The Doors appearance was some nine months after theirs, and no doubt fueled by the stones appeasement.
Quote
dcba
The sacking of Stu opened the door for the lovely super-talented Nicky Hopkins.
The sacking of Brian opened the door for the lovely super-talented Mick Taylor.
Can you imagine the music made during the golden 68-72 years without MT? Me neither...
Quote
stoneheartedQuote
dcba
The sacking of Stu opened the door for the lovely super-talented Nicky Hopkins.The sacking ofStu's refusal to play minor chords opened the door for the lovely super-talented Nicky Hopkins.
Quote
His MajestyQuote
dcba
The sacking of Stu opened the door for the lovely super-talented Nicky Hopkins.
The sacking of Brian opened the door for the lovely super-talented Mick Taylor.
Can you imagine the music made during the golden 68-72 years without MT? Me neither...
Stu played when he wanted to. Even if he had not been relieved of full membership, they probably would still have used other piano players.
The golden period of 1963 - 1968, including Beggars Banquet, is just fine without MT. What followed would be fine too without him, they just needed someone competent and reliable enough to play. They got more than that, but it's all that was really needed. The songs and all the rest was all in place to ensure a musically interesting future. The "golden period" would still be golden had Ronnie joined in 1969 for example.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
His MajestyQuote
dcba
The sacking of Stu opened the door for the lovely super-talented Nicky Hopkins.
The sacking of Brian opened the door for the lovely super-talented Mick Taylor.
Can you imagine the music made during the golden 68-72 years without MT? Me neither...
Stu played when he wanted to. Even if he had not been relieved of full membership, they probably would still have used other piano players.
The golden period of 1963 - 1968, including Beggars Banquet, is just fine without MT. What followed would be fine too without him, they just needed someone competent and reliable enough to play. They got more than that, but it's all that was really needed. The songs and all the rest was all in place to ensure a musically interesting future. The "golden period" would still be golden had Ronnie joined in 1969 for example.
Quote
vertigojoeQuote
TheflyingDutchmanQuote
Phil Good
Stu
Brian
Mick T
Please explain.
Have you not been paying attention?
Quote
Harlem Shuffler
Ronnie Wood could have come up with what Mick Taylor did? You're having a laugh.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
His Majesty
Stu played when he wanted to. Even if he had not been relieved of full membership, they probably would still have used other piano players.
The golden period of 1963 - 1968, including Beggars Banquet, is just fine without MT. What followed would be fine too without him, they just needed someone competent and reliable enough to play. They got more than that, but it's all that was really needed. The songs and all the rest was all in place to ensure a musically interesting future. The "golden period" would still be golden had Ronnie joined in 1969 for example.
Quote
StonedAsia
The real question to be asked is this: do you regret mortgaging your home every tour, spending your kids' inheritance on tickets, hotels, airplanes, and booze and having the time of your life??? Nah, didn't think so!!!
Quote
TheflyingDutchmanQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
His Majesty
Stu played when he wanted to. Even if he had not been relieved of full membership, they probably would still have used other piano players.
The golden period of 1963 - 1968, including Beggars Banquet, is just fine without MT. What followed would be fine too without him, they just needed someone competent and reliable enough to play. They got more than that, but it's all that was really needed. The songs and all the rest was all in place to ensure a musically interesting future. The "golden period" would still be golden had Ronnie joined in 1969 for example.
Friends forever.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
But everything Phil wrote is true, though, even though Taylor made them even better
Quote
His Majesty
The golden period of 1963 - 1968