For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
maumauQuote
keithsmanQuote
maumauQuote
keithsman
I mentioned this on another thread but no reaction, if you look at Keith's fingers on this HTW clip, its clear to see his fingers are much better.
How are they better ? i don't know but it explains why he is playing much better.
Pic of keith's fingers before
[infotel.ca]
try with a post title like this: "Scarf intro compile: the true story of a note bummer. Is it arthritis or brain damage?" you might get enthusiastic partecipation and in depth analysis
I don't understand your comments, its a very valid subject in relation to the close up of Keith playing in your post.
Keith is playing better than in many many years and his fingers look much better.
Can't believe this is not the place to discuss.
I know some forms of arthritis are made worse with excessive alcohol consumption, with Keith clearly sober since Christmas, this could be something that as helped with the arthritis in his hands and fingers.
Sorry keithsman, I agree completely with you. This is the place to discuss matters like that. In fact that was the purpose of my post in the first place. I was ironic about the fact that, instead, here usually Keith's playing is thoroughly analyzed only when he fu*%$ up.
Quote
keithsman
Mick all over the place here on JJF, having all sorts of problems, why doesn't he just take his ear piece out until the technicians sort it out.
I just find it hard to believe he can't sing it with the band when he can't hear himself through his ear piece.
Take it out and he gets to hear the same show as everyone else including his own voice.
I'm sure someone will explain to me why Mick can't do that
[www.youtube.com]
Quote
keithsmanQuote
maumauQuote
keithsmanQuote
maumauQuote
keithsman
I mentioned this on another thread but no reaction, if you look at Keith's fingers on this HTW clip, its clear to see his fingers are much better.
How are they better ? i don't know but it explains why he is playing much better.
Pic of keith's fingers before
[infotel.ca]
try with a post title like this: "Scarf intro compile: the true story of a note bummer. Is it arthritis or brain damage?" you might get enthusiastic partecipation and in depth analysis
I don't understand your comments, its a very valid subject in relation to the close up of Keith playing in your post.
Keith is playing better than in many many years and his fingers look much better.
Can't believe this is not the place to discuss.
I know some forms of arthritis are made worse with excessive alcohol consumption, with Keith clearly sober since Christmas, this could be something that as helped with the arthritis in his hands and fingers.
Sorry keithsman, I agree completely with you. This is the place to discuss matters like that. In fact that was the purpose of my post in the first place. I was ironic about the fact that, instead, here usually Keith's playing is thoroughly analyzed only when he fu*%$ up.
Oh sorry, yes i see what you mean, like for instance Mick totally messes up the whole of JJF whereas Keith was solid as a Rock as usual, but alas, people don't discuss Mick as messing up, its a technical problem, oh and Keith saving the song doesn't get a mention.
I guess Keith's the guy people love to hate on iorr ( but not anywhere else come to think of it , that's probably because all the realists who were speaking the truth left here a while ago..) I mean to most real fans, Keith is the Stones, always was, wrote all the best songs, best Riffs, intros, moves, interviews, coolest cat who gave them the outlaw image and carried that image for all it's worth because that sells the Stones and puts bums on seats.
Half the reason people attended Stones concerts since the mid 70's is because they think it's the last time they will see The Stones, and that reason was Keith, he wasn't expected to make it to play another tour.
Sure Mick is the main deal now, he is phenomenal, and people want to see this freak of nature do his work out. They know its impossible but there it is, they want to see it in person, and there is Mick doing his thing, and doing it better and better. It makes no sense , its impossible but there he goes, people love it, it tells them that if Mick can still do that then they are not old.
It's always been Mick and Keith, then you have the yes men.
Thought Ronnie was lousy in France, but hey, no one can criticize good old fun loving Ronniebegood
Nothing against the guy but he ain't no great music artist, hes got his shit together since sobering up and all credit to him, plus he proves that being a yes man can take you a long way in life with a degree of talent, he didn't lose his job when he could barely play for over two decades due to being wasted most nights.
Proof of that is when you look at Mick Taylor, more talent than the band could handle but he couldn't say yes, and look where that got him.
This is the band of the yes men unless you can go it alone, unfortunately Taylor isn't driven like that , he's not comfortable on his own.
On the 50th anniversary shows with Taylor blowing the rest of them off the stage every night, it didn't do him any good, it wasn't entirely what they wanted from him, shine but don't outshine the rest of us lol.
Even Keith to some degree has turned into another yes man, i still think the Stones could be so much better live if things were different, if the rest of them didn't give way to Mick and Chucks samey set lists decade after decade.
Sorry for my ramble, got carried away with my thoughts then
Quote
marlboro
This is John Lee Hooker junior,he supportet the Stones in Spielberg-Austria
Quote
midimannz
The first four songs on the new DVD are incredible
Quote
DocQuote
midimannz
The first four songs on the new DVD are incredible
???