For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
rodes
Wich is the best version circulated for the moment?
Quote
Silver Dagger
Who owns the rights to this film? Is it the Stones? If so it will never see the light of day.
Quote
Deltics
I think the rights belong to Robert Frank.
Quote
TeaAtThree
I believe it's once a year with him present.
Quote
jlowe
Unless Copyright law changes, the film enters the Public Domain in 2067.
That is 1972 plus 95 years.
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
jlowe
Unless Copyright law changes, the film enters the Public Domain in 2067.
That is 1972 plus 95 years.
Are there other rules for films than for songs and other art forms?
Quote
jloweQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
jlowe
Unless Copyright law changes, the film enters the Public Domain in 2067.
That is 1972 plus 95 years.
Are there other rules for films than for songs and other art forms?
There are!
It's a very complex issue which certainly keeps the legal eagles busy.
Some 'product' can stretch a very long time into the future. For example the copyright on the written song/composition is I believe: from death of 'author' plus 70 years.
Disney Corporation will be arguing for changes in current laws: Mickey Mouse (trademark) is up in 2023 (1928 plus 95 years).
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
jloweQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
jlowe
Unless Copyright law changes, the film enters the Public Domain in 2067.
That is 1972 plus 95 years.
Are there other rules for films than for songs and other art forms?
There are!
It's a very complex issue which certainly keeps the legal eagles busy.
Some 'product' can stretch a very long time into the future. For example the copyright on the written song/composition is I believe: from death of 'author' plus 70 years.
Disney Corporation will be arguing for changes in current laws: Mickey Mouse (trademark) is up in 2023 (1928 plus 95 years).
Hm, as '67 Sessions recently were released, that makes it pretty clear that the rules are indeed 50 years for songs, not 70 years.
However, those rules might be different in the US, as the album isn't available over there, I heard?
Quote
DelticsQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
jloweQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
jlowe
Unless Copyright law changes, the film enters the Public Domain in 2067.
That is 1972 plus 95 years.
Are there other rules for films than for songs and other art forms?
There are!
It's a very complex issue which certainly keeps the legal eagles busy.
Some 'product' can stretch a very long time into the future. For example the copyright on the written song/composition is I believe: from death of 'author' plus 70 years.
Disney Corporation will be arguing for changes in current laws: Mickey Mouse (trademark) is up in 2023 (1928 plus 95 years).
Hm, as '67 Sessions recently were released, that makes it pretty clear that the rules are indeed 50 years for songs, not 70 years.
However, those rules might be different in the US, as the album isn't available over there, I heard?
In the EU, it's 50 years for unreleased recordings and 70 years for released recordings. Don't know about film.
Quote
DelticsQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
jloweQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
jlowe
Unless Copyright law changes, the film enters the Public Domain in 2067.
That is 1972 plus 95 years.
Are there other rules for films than for songs and other art forms?
There are!
It's a very complex issue which certainly keeps the legal eagles busy.
Some 'product' can stretch a very long time into the future. For example the copyright on the written song/composition is I believe: from death of 'author' plus 70 years.
Disney Corporation will be arguing for changes in current laws: Mickey Mouse (trademark) is up in 2023 (1928 plus 95 years).
Hm, as '67 Sessions recently were released, that makes it pretty clear that the rules are indeed 50 years for songs, not 70 years.
However, those rules might be different in the US, as the album isn't available over there, I heard?
In the EU, it's 50 years for unreleased recordings and 70 years for released recordings. Don't know about film.
Quote
pmk251
During the voice-overs at the beginning of Crossfire Hurricane Taylor says something to the effect (paraphrasing) "I hope (the movie) is fun because that was what the band was..." I thought it an odd comment that contradicts other statements made by Taylor and others in the band. Try hard as you might the "fun" in CS Blues is exhausting. If my memory is accurate there is a scene where Jagger (and I think Taylor) are riding around in a car in the middle of nowhere and Jagger is just happy to be away from everyone, the hangers on, etc. It must have been a relief to get back on stage. There must have been times of fun, but no one (Wyman, Jagger or Taylor) has fond memories of the south of France and the making of Exile. Years after the fact the experience still does not set well with them. By the time of the '73 tour drugs were taking their toll. Taylor said his time on stage then was excruciating and he could not wait to get it over with. The movie is a miscalculation by the band. If it was not released THEN, there is no point in releasing it now. It is not going to get better with age.
Quote
TheGreek
the PPV show from Miami 1994
Quote
dcbaQuote
TheGreek
the PPV show from Miami 1994
Please not that one! The rehearsals from the previous day are actually better than the PPV itself (imo).
can you tell me more about the official release ?Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
dcbaQuote
TheGreek
the PPV show from Miami 1994
Please not that one! The rehearsals from the previous day are actually better than the PPV itself (imo).
And that show was indeed officially released on video.