Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: Previous12345Next
Current Page: 4 of 5
Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: DeanGoodman ()
Date: February 27, 2017 15:58

Our Nic is one strap away from a wardrobe malfunction.

(And Bill German is a genius, btw.)

Re: Mick in LA - February 26
Posted by: keefriff99 ()
Date: February 27, 2017 16:19

Quote
bye bye johnny
Quote
keefriff99
Mick's face looks very odd in this one...swollen on one side. Just a bad shot?

Clearly. Just look at the other photos.
Yeah but there's something REALLY wrong in that photo...it almost looks photoshopped.

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: colonial ()
Date: February 27, 2017 21:06

Mick Jagger the world's only Five Star ***** A-Lister

--------------
ColonialstoneNZ
--------------

Re: Mick in LA - February 26
Posted by: georgeV ()
Date: February 27, 2017 22:15

/quote]
Mick's face looks very odd in this one...swollen on one side. Just a bad shot?[/quote]

Maybe someone's husband gave him a good shot! :>)

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: Beast ()
Date: February 27, 2017 22:19

Quote
bye bye johnny
With Lachlan Murdoch:


Justin Bishop

And there's Rupert himself in the background, with Jerry.

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: mitch ()
Date: February 27, 2017 22:28

Quote
Beast

And there's Rupert himself in the background, with Jerry.

You want Murdoch and Jagger on the same shoot?
Just ask.


Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: john lomax ()
Date: February 28, 2017 00:07

Well that has to be the most bizarre extended family shot I've seen in a while. So is Mick Lachlan's half-step-dad once removed?? smiling smiley

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: RipThisBone ()
Date: February 28, 2017 00:11

James Jagger looks pissed in the last shot. Hahaha. Who wouldn't be in his case at this occasion.
thumbs up

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: February 28, 2017 00:14

James is doin' a Keef pose .....



ROCKMAN

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: snorton ()
Date: February 28, 2017 01:43

MICK IS DOING HIS USUAL STANCE, BOTH FEE STRAIGHT AT THE CAMERA AND UP ON THE TOES.

Re: Mick in LA - February 26
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: February 28, 2017 08:15

Quote
keefriff99
Quote
bye bye johnny
With Jerry Hall, Anjelica Huston and Kelly Lynch:

Mick's face looks very odd in this one...swollen on one side. Just a bad shot?

right hemispherical mumps?

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: angee ()
Date: February 28, 2017 08:39

Jerry and Mick sure had some good-looking kids.

~"Love is Strong"~

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: lem motlow ()
Date: February 28, 2017 19:38

Quote
Stoneage
Quote
jlowe
Quote
Stoneage
Either you use titles or you don't. If you do, do it correctly. So it's either Mick Jagger or Sir Michael (or Mick). Not Mr Jagger. That is simply wrong.

Presumably Brenda or Dame Brenda Jagger is out of the question, then?

Not at all! Either Brenda or Dame Brenda is correct. Not Mrs (or Ms) Jagger though...


let's be honest-because of jaggers past with the gender bending,the bowie rumors etc the usual cast of bigots come out on nearly every stand alone mick thread.i would have at least a little respect if you'd just admit what you are instead of hiding behind the usual "lighten up,we're just joking".

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: MisterDDDD ()
Date: February 28, 2017 20:03

[quote="lem motlow"
let's be honest-because of jaggers past with the gender bending,the bowie rumors etc the usual cast of bigots come out on nearly every stand alone mick thread.i would have at least a little respect if you'd just admit what you are instead of hiding behind the usual "lighten up,we're just joking".[/quote]
smileys with beer

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: EJM ()
Date: February 28, 2017 20:20

Cheering really to see civilised behaviour with the the Jaggers and the Murdochs across the generations - Jerry was always good st this sort of thing with Mick's complex family and it seems Mick is now doing the same

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: NICOS ()
Date: February 28, 2017 21:46

Is this what we call the jet set..................

__________________________

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: Kurt ()
Date: February 28, 2017 21:56

Mick Jagger is the coolest man on the planet.

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: NICOS ()
Date: February 28, 2017 22:06

Quote
Kurt
Mick Jagger is the coolest man on the planet.

Woman would say the hottest...........

__________________________

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: jlowe ()
Date: February 28, 2017 22:31

I wonder how Mick and Rupert get on, on a one to one basis?
That's assuming they are on occasions alone together.

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: EJM ()
Date: February 28, 2017 23:07

Cheering really to see civilised behaviour with the the Jaggers and the Murdochs across the generations - Jerry was always good st this sort of thing with Mick's complex family and it seems Mick is now doing the same

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: March 1, 2017 02:03

Quote
lem motlow
Quote
Stoneage
Quote
jlowe
Quote
Stoneage
Either you use titles or you don't. If you do, do it correctly. So it's either Mick Jagger or Sir Michael (or Mick). Not Mr Jagger. That is simply wrong.

Presumably Brenda or Dame Brenda Jagger is out of the question, then?

Not at all! Either Brenda or Dame Brenda is correct. Not Mrs (or Ms) Jagger though...


let's be honest-because of jaggers past with the gender bending,the bowie rumors etc the usual cast of bigots come out on nearly every stand alone mick thread.i would have at least a little respect if you'd just admit what you are instead of hiding behind the usual "lighten up,we're just joking".

nice call out Lem!

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: black n blue ()
Date: March 1, 2017 02:06

Mick looks better than Jerry now

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: gotdablouse ()
Date: March 1, 2017 02:15

Quote
bye bye johnny
With Georgia May and Elizabeth:


Is it me or does Mick look more and more like Jeff Beck these days, same wig supplier maybe ?

--------------
IORR Links : Essential Studio Outtakes CDs : Audio - History of Rarest Outtakes : Audio

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: snorton ()
Date: March 1, 2017 03:19

Quote
gotdablouse
Quote
bye bye johnny
With Georgia May and Elizabeth:


Is it me or does Mick look more and more like Jeff Beck these days, same wig supplier maybe ?

Mick on his tippie toes again.

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: black n blue ()
Date: March 1, 2017 04:14

Quote
gotdablouse
Quote
bye bye johnny
With Georgia May and Elizabeth:


Is it me or does Mick look more and more like Jeff Beck these days, same wig supplier maybe ?
Mick has more wrinkles

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: EddieByword ()
Date: March 1, 2017 04:37

Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
lem motlow
Quote
Stoneage
Quote
jlowe
Quote
Stoneage
Either you use titles or you don't. If you do, do it correctly. So it's either Mick Jagger or Sir Michael (or Mick). Not Mr Jagger. That is simply wrong.

Presumably Brenda or Dame Brenda Jagger is out of the question, then?

Not at all! Either Brenda or Dame Brenda is correct. Not Mrs (or Ms) Jagger though...


let's be honest-because of jaggers past with the gender bending,the bowie rumors etc the usual cast of bigots come out on nearly every stand alone mick thread.i would have at least a little respect if you'd just admit what you are instead of hiding behind the usual "lighten up,we're just joking".

nice call out Lem!

Brenda was a nickname given to Mick by Keith after Brenda Jagger.......[en.wikipedia.org] .......so I read at any rate........

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: keefriff99 ()
Date: March 1, 2017 05:46

Quote
jlowe
I wonder how Mick and Rupert get on, on a one to one basis?
That's assuming they are on occasions alone together.
Given their love for money and Tory politics, I'm sure they get on splendidly.

Re: Mick in LA
Date: March 1, 2017 10:44

Quote
EddieByword
Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
lem motlow
Quote
Stoneage
Quote
jlowe
Quote
Stoneage
Either you use titles or you don't. If you do, do it correctly. So it's either Mick Jagger or Sir Michael (or Mick). Not Mr Jagger. That is simply wrong.

Presumably Brenda or Dame Brenda Jagger is out of the question, then?

Not at all! Either Brenda or Dame Brenda is correct. Not Mrs (or Ms) Jagger though...


let's be honest-because of jaggers past with the gender bending,the bowie rumors etc the usual cast of bigots come out on nearly every stand alone mick thread.i would have at least a little respect if you'd just admit what you are instead of hiding behind the usual "lighten up,we're just joking".

nice call out Lem!

Brenda was a nickname given to Mick by Keith after Brenda Jagger.......[en.wikipedia.org] .......so I read at any rate........

He even sings about Brenda in Victor Hugo winking smiley

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: ouroux58 ()
Date: March 1, 2017 11:23

Quote
mitch

You want Murdoch and Jagger on the same shoot?
Just ask.


Jerry Hall married Rupert Everett because Trump was not available at this time.

Re: Mick in LA
Posted by: gotdablouse ()
Date: March 1, 2017 12:36

Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
EddieByword

Brenda was a nickname given to Mick by Keith after Brenda Jagger.......[en.wikipedia.org] .......so I read at any rate........

He even sings about Brenda in Victor Hugo winking smiley

Yes "Brenda" is mentioned at 1:26 [youtu.be] but the song is apparently not about "Brenda" since he says "you're just like Brenda". The jury's still out on who the song is about [iorr.org]

--------------
IORR Links : Essential Studio Outtakes CDs : Audio - History of Rarest Outtakes : Audio



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2017-03-01 12:36 by gotdablouse.

Goto Page: Previous12345Next
Current Page: 4 of 5


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 2080
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home