Tell Me :
Talk
I'll put a vote in for Michael... not a Mick Jr.. but a Michael.
(realize diff last names)
Course, I'm kinda biased. - Mike
Mick is just following the pattern set by them 'ol blues guys.
Multiple relationships, loads of kids.
Love 'em and leave 'em (sort of).
Keith,by contrast is very traditional on this matter, it seems.
For you and me it's expensive...for him it's peanuts.....8 children x 8 700 000 = 69 600 0000...he still has at least 200 000 000 left
__________________________
OK now I get why people are discussing the child's name as if it was up to Mick. It's like naming rights with a stadium? People think that's part of the deal that was agreed to?
People are posting names and talking about them because a thread was started called "What will Mick name his new son?" and it was merged with this thread and now Mick probably wont be able to find the original thread and the child could remain nameless... unless... maybe he could contact Mercedes, Rogers, Edward Jones, Ford, Heinz, Lucas et al and they might cut a dealing paying M&M for naming rights.
Heinz Jagger... hmmmmm... idk
Everything is relative I guess. A pack of condoms is only around £5...
Wow, talk about egocentric..........Octavian, his eighth kid, Basil, his father, I guess, Deveraux, conceived on his riverbank........
I feel sorry for him (the baby) ......oh well, I guess he'll have plenty of DVDs to watch......
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: What will Mick name his new son?
Posted by:
The Sicilian
()
Date: December 10, 2016 20:37
Baron or Donald Jr. (oops, wrong guy!)
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
jlowe
()
Date: December 10, 2016 21:48
Rupert
after The late great Prince Rupert Lowenstein and.....
Rupert Murdoch
after The late great Prince Rupert Lowenstein and.....
Rupert Murdoch
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
Socrates1
()
Date: December 10, 2016 21:51
I keep thinking his middle name will be Christopher.
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
MisterDDDD
()
Date: December 10, 2016 22:14
I'll put a vote in for Michael... not a Mick Jr.. but a Michael.
(realize diff last names)
Course, I'm kinda biased. - Mike
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
sundevil
()
Date: December 10, 2016 23:32
mckinley morganfield jagger, if mick has any say.
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
Voodookitten76
()
Date: December 12, 2016 17:58
Ian or Stewart.
"Nice bit of silk, Em."
"Nice bit of silk, Em."
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
duke richardson
()
Date: December 12, 2016 18:55
whats that baby's name..?
they haven't said yet...?
they haven't said yet...?
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
Rockman
()
Date: December 12, 2016 21:21
"Little" Walter ....is the best suggestion so far ...
ROCKMAN
ROCKMAN
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
bitusa2012
()
Date: December 13, 2016 10:19
It IS a bit mind boggling! From today's Melbourne Age:
Mick Jagger’s eldest child, Karis Hunt Jagger, is 46 years old.
His second youngest child, Lucas was born in 1999, making him now 17.
Sir Mick also has five grandchildren and his first great-grandchild - a girl born to his 45-year-old daughter Jade's daughter Assisi, now 24yo, in 2014 - is now two years older than her newborn great-uncle. At least I think so. I might have to ask Stephen Hawking.
Rod
Mick Jagger’s eldest child, Karis Hunt Jagger, is 46 years old.
His second youngest child, Lucas was born in 1999, making him now 17.
Sir Mick also has five grandchildren and his first great-grandchild - a girl born to his 45-year-old daughter Jade's daughter Assisi, now 24yo, in 2014 - is now two years older than her newborn great-uncle. At least I think so. I might have to ask Stephen Hawking.
Rod
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
champ72
()
Date: December 13, 2016 11:55
I don't understand this thread, all these people saying "Congratulations Mick" as if he'll somehow appreciate the sentiment. Who gives a shit, it's his private life. Let's talk about what amp and mic he pushed his harp through on the new album!
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
MisterDDDD
()
Date: December 13, 2016 13:46
There's a thread for that, champ.Quote
champ72
I don't understand this thread, all these people saying "Congratulations Mick" as if he'll somehow appreciate the sentiment. Who gives a shit, it's his private life. Let's talk about what amp and mic he pushed his harp through on the new album!
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
jlowe
()
Date: December 13, 2016 14:11
Quote
bitusa2012
It IS a bit mind boggling! From today's Melbourne Age:
Mick Jagger’s eldest child, Karis Hunt Jagger, is 46 years old.
His second youngest child, Lucas was born in 1999, making him now 17.
Sir Mick also has five grandchildren and his first great-grandchild - a girl born to his 45-year-old daughter Jade's daughter Assisi, now 24yo, in 2014 - is now two years older than her newborn great-uncle. At least I think so. I might have to ask Stephen Hawking.
Mick is just following the pattern set by them 'ol blues guys.
Multiple relationships, loads of kids.
Love 'em and leave 'em (sort of).
Keith,by contrast is very traditional on this matter, it seems.
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
Stoneage
()
Date: December 13, 2016 14:56
I made a quick calculus on this:
£150k a year x 18 = £2700k
+ extra £500k
+ house £5500k
------------
= total cost £8 700 000
An expensive child I guess...
£150k a year x 18 = £2700k
+ extra £500k
+ house £5500k
------------
= total cost £8 700 000
An expensive child I guess...
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
jlowe
()
Date: December 13, 2016 22:12
Re name the baby:
I have a feeling John or William may feature.
I have a feeling John or William may feature.
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
NICOS
()
Date: December 14, 2016 01:04
Quote
Stoneage
I made a quick calculus on this:
£150k a year x 18 = £2700k
+ extra £500k
+ house £5500k
------------
= total cost £8 700 000
An expensive child I guess...
For you and me it's expensive...for him it's peanuts.....8 children x 8 700 000 = 69 600 0000...he still has at least 200 000 000 left
__________________________
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
HankM
()
Date: December 14, 2016 02:22
Papa was a Rolling Stone...
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
Rokyfan
()
Date: December 14, 2016 04:39
Quote
Stoneage
I made a quick calculus on this:
£150k a year x 18 = £2700k
+ extra £500k
+ house £5500k
------------
= total cost £8 700 000
An expensive child I guess...
OK now I get why people are discussing the child's name as if it was up to Mick. It's like naming rights with a stadium? People think that's part of the deal that was agreed to?
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
HankM
()
Date: December 14, 2016 07:02
Quote
RokyfanOK now I get why people are discussing the child's name as if it was up to Mick. It's like naming rights with a stadium? People think that's part of the deal that was agreed to?Quote
I made a quick calculus on this:
£150k a year x 18 = £2700k
+ extra £500k
+ house £5500k
------------
= total cost £8 700 000
An expensive child I guess...
People are posting names and talking about them because a thread was started called "What will Mick name his new son?" and it was merged with this thread and now Mick probably wont be able to find the original thread and the child could remain nameless... unless... maybe he could contact Mercedes, Rogers, Edward Jones, Ford, Heinz, Lucas et al and they might cut a dealing paying M&M for naming rights.
Heinz Jagger... hmmmmm... idk
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
Stoneage
()
Date: December 14, 2016 07:24
Quote
NICOS
Stoneage: I made a quick calculus on this:
£150k a year x 18 = £2700k
+ extra £500k
+ house £5500k
------------
= total cost £8 700 000
An expensive child I guess...
Nicos: For you and me it's expensive...for him it's peanuts.....8 children x 8 700 000 = 69 600 0000...he still has at least 200 000 000 left
Everything is relative I guess. A pack of condoms is only around £5...
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
Voodookitten76
()
Date: December 16, 2016 16:31
And it's Deveraux Octavian Basil Jagger! Nice name!
"Nice bit of silk, Em."
"Nice bit of silk, Em."
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
35love
()
Date: December 16, 2016 21:24
Oooh, that little baby is one cute, bright looking kid!
Maybe they'll call him Dev.
Adorable!
Maybe they'll call him Dev.
Adorable!
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
desertblues68
()
Date: December 16, 2016 21:33
So cute! He looks very bright and alert. And with two parents who are atlethic and into fitness he is going to be healthy and fit.
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
Bliss
()
Date: December 16, 2016 21:40
I was right - one of the baby's names is Basil.
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
Koen
()
Date: December 16, 2016 21:41
I know, it's only Deveraux, but I like it.
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: December 16, 2016 21:44
Octavian = 8?
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
EddieByword
()
Date: December 16, 2016 21:53
Quote
Voodookitten76
And it's Deveraux Octavian Basil Jagger! Nice name!
Wow, talk about egocentric..........Octavian, his eighth kid, Basil, his father, I guess, Deveraux, conceived on his riverbank........
I feel sorry for him (the baby) ......oh well, I guess he'll have plenty of DVDs to watch......
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
Rokyfan
()
Date: December 16, 2016 22:01
>>>>I feel sorry for him (the baby) ......oh well, I guess he'll have plenty of DVDs to watch......
On the other hand, more offspring might mean more archive releases, maybe even new releases . . . the bottom line is going to need a little boost.
On the other hand, more offspring might mean more archive releases, maybe even new releases . . . the bottom line is going to need a little boost.
Re: Mick Jagger becomes dad again at 73
Posted by:
1962
()
Date: December 16, 2016 22:01
Mick seems very proud of his 8th child.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
1StonesRecluse , a bigger nut , armin944 , bauk77 , bitusa2012 , bv , crholmstrom , Irix , JuanTCB , keefmick , kidquick185 , mike567 , MJAGGER123 , mmarloe , MonkeyMan2000 , MrEcho , muenke , Nobbi82 , quarkie , sarahunwin , sir sweden , Sockers56 , StonedRambler , toomanycds , vibrolux , voodoodrew
Guests:
1912
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10