Tell Me :
Talk
Responding to harsh (imo) criticism with criticism using humor is hardly "attacking", also imo.
And I'll finish:
"Stupid Girl"
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-07-15 23:48 by The Sicilian.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-07-16 00:06 by mnewman505.
[Tch!] No sense of adventure...
I was also defending Jagger and the screen name had nothing to do with anything.
Other than harkening back to the .. wait for it.. Stone Age.
Also:
You seem smart.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2016-07-16 00:20 by MisterDDDD.
I may be mistaken (and I'm sure I'll be corrected if I am) - but I believe that a day or so before the Pink Pop show in 2014 was when photos of Mick and the new girlfriend first appeared in the UK tabloids. And then 'Rocks Off' made it's first appearance on the summer 2014 tour at Pink Pop. I picked up on that immediately due to the lyrics quoted above, and thought there is no way this is a coincidence. Granted it was the 'by request' which is almost certainly rigged - but I think Mick picked the song deliberately at that time. There used to be an excellent video of it on YouTube but I think it got taken down.
[Note to self: stop drinking whilst reading Rockeeee's posts. Also, buy paper towels.]
If I can't, I'll line dry 'em between eruptions.
Eventually in this thread, I read a post that expresses what I immediately thought.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
MisterDDDD
()
Date: July 15, 2016 21:14
No one suggesting banning anything of the sort that I've seen.Quote
Stoneage
It's also moralism to ban critism of the Rolling Stones or Sir Michael Jagger. Or to attack those who do, Mister DDDD.
Responding to harsh (imo) criticism with criticism using humor is hardly "attacking", also imo.
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
MidnightDevilRambler
()
Date: July 15, 2016 21:19
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
TheflyingDutchman
()
Date: July 15, 2016 21:30
---
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
TheGreek
()
Date: July 15, 2016 21:35
it is funny how life has come full circle on the Glimmer Twins .Who is the moral upstanding citizen now?Quote
dcba
"We are not worried about petty morals" said Keith in 67.
[www.history.com]
49 years later (gulp!) Keith is the epitome of bourgeois life (blodne wife big cottage house) while Mick's the true social insubordinate...
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
jumpontopofmebaby
()
Date: July 15, 2016 21:43
Melanie " STAR STAR" Hamrick!!!!!!
Some girls give me children!
My My Said the spider to the fly!
Tried to take me upstairs for a ride!
'and...the list goes on
Hope when I am 72 I can still .....well you know!!!!!
Some girls give me children!
My My Said the spider to the fly!
Tried to take me upstairs for a ride!
'and...the list goes on
Hope when I am 72 I can still .....well you know!!!!!
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
GasLightStreet
()
Date: July 15, 2016 21:56
Won't Mick be 73 when the baby is born?
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
HMS
()
Date: July 15, 2016 22:10
Yas and he´ll be pushing 90 when the child is about to get a driving-licence.
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
runrudolph
()
Date: July 15, 2016 22:10
Jump on top of me, baby. hahahahaha
Good on ya mick.
jeroen
Good on ya mick.
jeroen
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
The Sicilian
()
Date: July 15, 2016 23:47
Quote
dcba
How about we now turn this thread into a tasteless series of baseless accusations based on Stones song titles...
Let me start :
"She Was Hot"
"All The Way Down"
And I'll finish:
"Stupid Girl"
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-07-15 23:48 by The Sicilian.
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
doitywoik
()
Date: July 15, 2016 23:52
Yeah, if they'd produced as many albums in the past few years as they produced children we'd be happy people! ... or maybe not 
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
mnewman505
()
Date: July 16, 2016 00:05
hahaha I'm sorry I didn't muster enough creative energy to come up with the groundbreakingly unique "MisterDDDD" lol. Grasping at straws when the best personal attack you can come up with is "my screen name is better than yours." Hey, i'm the OP...if I wan't to question someone throwing massive moral judgements around aimed at the lead singer of band the website is for, I will. The knighthood is a joke, who cares? Someone wants to tear Mick's morals apart on my thread, i'm going to defend Mick Jagger...is that alright with you?Quote
MisterDDDDExcellent screen name. Were oldfuddyduddy or getoffmylawn already taken?Quote
Stoneage
Moral high horse? I'm only questioning his knighthood. From a moral standpoint albeit. But this is useless on a fansite I agree. So I will erase my earlier posts in order not to upset anyone.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-07-16 00:06 by mnewman505.
Re: Mick jagger......new son soon!
Posted by:
SomeTorontoGirl
()
Date: July 16, 2016 00:16
Quote
Rockman
...a lil more romantic than centre - stage ..... hhhhaaaa
[Tch!] No sense of adventure...
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
MisterDDDD
()
Date: July 16, 2016 00:17
Quote
mnewman505hahaha I'm sorry I didn't muster enough creative energy to come up with the groundbreakingly unique "MisterDDDD" lol. Grasping at straws when the best personal attack you can come up with is "my screen name is better than yours." Hey, i'm the OP...if I wan't to question someone throwing massive moral judgements around aimed at the lead singer of band the website is for, I will. The knighthood is a joke, who cares? Someone wants to tear Mick's morals apart on my thread, i'm going to defend Mick Jagger...is that alright with you?Quote
MisterDDDDExcellent screen name. Were oldfuddyduddy or getoffmylawn already taken?Quote
Stoneage
Moral high horse? I'm only questioning his knighthood. From a moral standpoint albeit. But this is useless on a fansite I agree. So I will erase my earlier posts in order not to upset anyone.
I was also defending Jagger and the screen name had nothing to do with anything.
Other than harkening back to the .. wait for it.. Stone Age.
Also:
You seem smart.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2016-07-16 00:20 by MisterDDDD.
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
roller99
()
Date: July 16, 2016 00:27
It's so funny, all the bitching and fighting, while everyone ignores what Ronnie and Mick having kids means for the band.....
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
HomerSimpson
()
Date: July 16, 2016 00:32
Quote
corriecasQuote
Koen
How appropriate:
I was making love last night
To a dancer friend of mine.
I can't seem to stay in step,
'Cause she come ev'ry time that she pirouettes over me.
Jeroen
I may be mistaken (and I'm sure I'll be corrected if I am) - but I believe that a day or so before the Pink Pop show in 2014 was when photos of Mick and the new girlfriend first appeared in the UK tabloids. And then 'Rocks Off' made it's first appearance on the summer 2014 tour at Pink Pop. I picked up on that immediately due to the lyrics quoted above, and thought there is no way this is a coincidence. Granted it was the 'by request' which is almost certainly rigged - but I think Mick picked the song deliberately at that time. There used to be an excellent video of it on YouTube but I think it got taken down.
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
MisterDDDD
()
Date: July 16, 2016 00:35
Good point roller99.. For Ronnie at least it would appear to be a good thing as he seems genuinely excited about his twins experiencing the backstage excitement.
You may want to start a new thread though if you're looking for contrasting opinions.. the author here gets awful bitchy and threatening when you disagree..(or in my case, agree)..
Some kind of new rule apparently when she starts a thread...
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-07-16 00:36 by MisterDDDD.
You may want to start a new thread though if you're looking for contrasting opinions.. the author here gets awful bitchy and threatening when you disagree..(or in my case, agree)..
Some kind of new rule apparently when she starts a thread...Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-07-16 00:36 by MisterDDDD.
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
Rockman
()
Date: July 16, 2016 00:49
[Tch!] No sense of adventure...
......... things that go buzzzzzzzzz in the middle of the night
ROCKMAN
......... things that go buzzzzzzzzz in the middle of the night
ROCKMAN
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
Sir Mick
()
Date: July 16, 2016 01:29
Hahahaha!
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
kish_stoned
()
Date: July 16, 2016 02:08
hahaha what a star fuc........ good luck the mojo is working no wonder album is delayed, mick parking his car in diff garage. (let it bleed).
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: July 16, 2016 02:18
Charlie, as before, as always.Quote
TheGreekit is funny how life has come full circle on the Glimmer Twins .Who is the moral upstanding citizen now?Quote
dcba
"We are not worried about petty morals" said Keith in 67.
[www.history.com]
49 years later (gulp!) Keith is the epitome of bourgeois life (blodne wife big cottage house) while Mick's the true social insubordinate...
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
SomeTorontoGirl
()
Date: July 16, 2016 02:48
Quote
Rockman
[Tch!] No sense of adventure...
......... things that go buzzzzzzzzz in the middle of the night
[Note to self: stop drinking whilst reading Rockeeee's posts. Also, buy paper towels.]
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
Rockman
()
Date: July 16, 2016 03:05
Also, buy paper towels
....and please try to make sure you use recycled paper towels ....
ROCKMAN
....and please try to make sure you use recycled paper towels ....
ROCKMAN
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
SomeTorontoGirl
()
Date: July 16, 2016 03:54
Quote
Rockman
Also, buy paper towels
....and please try to make sure you use recycled paper towels ....
If I can't, I'll line dry 'em between eruptions.
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
triceratops
()
Date: July 16, 2016 04:11
Mick got tired of hearing what a stud Ronnie is.
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
roller99
()
Date: July 16, 2016 04:38
Did anyone notice that this story was exclusive to The Sun? Murdoch's rag....
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
chatoyancy
()
Date: July 16, 2016 04:52
At least Keith reveals his secret romance only in his songs. First line of Crosseyed Heart: "I love my sugar but I love my honey too"...
Mick assumed she was on the pill because of her schedule of performances. Ballet dancers are instructed to avoid pregnancy.
Mick assumed she was on the pill because of her schedule of performances. Ballet dancers are instructed to avoid pregnancy.
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
Bashlets
()
Date: July 16, 2016 05:09
mick really needs to start thinking about a vasectomy. He has always had several young gals going at once and he has never claimed to be in a monogamous relationship with this girl. Yet in this day and age she ends up pregnant? He'll support her and be a great dad but I can't help but think that deep down inside he feels like he has been duped again.
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
Witness
()
Date: July 16, 2016 07:44
Quote
stonesrule
Of course there's a FACT that no one seems to mention.
It's really none of our business.
Eventually in this thread, I read a post that expresses what I immediately thought.
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
Rockman
()
Date: July 16, 2016 07:51
eruptions.!!!!...is that kinda like when a guy gets an..... aawwww sorry don't worry about it
ROCKMAN
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-07-16 08:50 by Rockman.
ROCKMAN
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-07-16 08:50 by Rockman.
Re: Mick Jagger to Be a Dad Again at Age 72
Posted by:
RawIguanaCologne
()
Date: July 16, 2016 08:15
This is a drag of a thread...
is this the Daily Mirror here?
Let the man do what he ever wants to!
Ahoi, Seb
is this the Daily Mirror here?
Let the man do what he ever wants to!
Ahoi, Seb
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
amsteltje , Bashlets , colonial , dishevelmentblues , gimme_shelter , goingmad , highgatehillbilly , jigsaw69 , keithglimmer , Mabru , Mr.Soul , pjb , rayrad , SimonN , spunky , stonesmuziekfan , swimtothemoon , Topi , TW2019
Guests:
1600
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10