You're losing reality. Most people here have a heard time reading your female macho posts, driven by a mix of frustration and hormones. And if you'll review my posts, you'll see, I never called you any animal words...

You're just disgusting.

Four Stone Walls Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Taylorheads can also be Woodyheads. Are you not a
> bit too tough in the head?


If you read this board properly: there are always Ronnie bashers
around who stopped liking the Stones in 1974/75. If there is no tour or no news at all they always want Taylor back or talk about replacing Ronnie. This just
sucks. The talk about Ronnie is always the same. I mean those people with "Taylorheads". Quite satisfying for me that Ronnie rocks like hell
on a new Stones song call Rough Justice.

If you are a Woodyhead as well as a Taylorhead it seems that you have uinderstood the Stones history quite good.

Bärs Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "One only has to go back and listen to the work
> Taylor did on "Sister Morphine" to appreciate the
> beauty of his slide work. His subtleness, yet bold
> riffs, turn that song into a classic."
>
>
> You can not take a person seriously if he writes
> stuff like that.


I guess your point is that you don't like that song? Otherwise all you've done is slag someone without explanation. Are you suppose to be taken seriously?

TooTough Wrote:
> If you are a Woodyhead as well as a Taylorhead it
> seems that you have uinderstood the Stones history
> quite good.


I think they should bring back Dick Taylor on bass

Does that make me a "Dickhead" ?

What on Earth is a " Heard time" and what animal words? Talk about delusional!Now back to the important stuff.TOO TOUGH, I think many of us prefer Mick Taylor's fluid, bluesy style but we realize he's gone for good. Too much water under the bridge and bad blood between Keith and Taylor to ever get him back...not the MT wants to return. I do happen to be one of those Stones fans who can recognize Ronnie's contributions but still feel he is way too inconsistent. One night he plays the Hell out of his slide , the next night he spend 50% of the time posing and not playing! I watch him alot on stage and he really can be great, which in itself is annoying! Why can't he be GREAT EVERY NIGHT? And I don't think that's too much to ask of professional musicians.

Are Mick or Keith great every night?

Are you great every night? I doubt that! By the way: is your German as good as my English is? I doubt that also. Professional musicians? What are you? Prof lesbian? They do it for fun, none of them needs the money. I always knew you don't even understand what's going on. You're not worth any other letter, D.

So piss off, lazy bitch!

I think Mica, that you constantly show your total igniorance and I'm very happy about that. Truly, it's not hARD to look intelligent NEXT TO YOU! And yes, I think Mick is at least consistent each night...Keith, not so consistent, Charlie is ALWAYS SOLID! Yes, DUMBO, they ARE professionals! Man, you are not in touch, are you? Got take a nice nap and forget to return, do us all a HUGE FAVOR.

Igniorance??? Ooh, ooh;-)

IGNORANCE, LOOK IT UP, YOUR PHOTO IS RIGHT NEXT TO THE WORD.

And your poor SHIFT-key is yelling for grace *LOL*
Perhaps your psychiatrist has some hints...

I AM The psychiatrist!

Oh, that's really dangerous!

Gazza Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I think they should bring back Dick Taylor on
> bass
>
> Does that make me a "Dickhead" ?


*Puking with laughter*

JumpingKentFlash

Debra, the problem with Taylor getting an invite to jam isn't with Keith,
look to Mr. Jagger as to why it hasn't happened. And Taylor would jump at the
chance to come back and play a few gigs, he can really use the $$

MLC

Debra, you're totally right on this one. I've seen ten Licks-concerts. Stadiums (Toronto, Paris, Kuip, Arena and Twickenham). Arenas (Toronto, Bercy and Ahoy). Theatres (Olympia and Vredenburg). And Mick delivers. Always. The same with Charlie. Always doin'a great job. Keith is not always consistent. And Ronnie is not consistent at all. That has nothing to do with Mick Taylor, it's just a fact. Just read the reviews of the Licks-tour. I love Ronnie as a true Rolling Stone but the last tours he's to busy acting and posing instead of just doing his job. And considering the ticket prices for the upcoming tour it would be nice if the boys are taken their job seriously. Mick and Charlie will. Every night.

"Too busy acting..." etc - yeah, especially when he slipped, which was more of a problem in Europe than the US

Mick and Charlie have to deliver every night (okay I suppose they could hire a second drummer)....if they don't deliver EVERYBODY (even dumbass fans) knows it. But, Ron & Keith can "hide" - and that's clearly been the strategy with the "iffy" sound system - sometimes you can't tell what the hell's going on with the guitars, and I have to believe that's intentional.

John, I think you're right. IMO Ronnie's performances in Toronto were so much better than the way he plays (acts) at some concerts in Europe I've attended. I really hope Ronnie is consistent in the next tour. The reports of his last solo-concerts in London were good. So let's wait and see.

> Yeah, Ron, right in the face of all those Taylorheads!!!!

I don't think so, did you ever listen carefully to Taylors playing?
(and Mick T. also can do it if he is drunken, in opposite to Ron ;-)

What a boring "discussion here"". Be all glad---that the boys are still rolling.

I like MT and RW. The Rolling Stones are Jagger/Richards/ Wyman/ WATTS and BRIAN JONES

MisterD Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bärs Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > "One only has to go back and listen to the
> work
> > Taylor did on "Sister Morphine" to appreciate
> the
> > beauty of his slide work. His subtleness, yet
> bold
> > riffs, turn that song into a classic."
> >
> >
> > You can not take a person seriously if he
> writes
> > stuff like that.
>
>
> I guess your point is that you don't like that
> song? Otherwise all you've done is slag someone
> without explanation. Are you suppose to be taken
> seriously?
>
>
>

The point is that if you think that MT plays slide on SM your knowledge is that limited that it affects your credibility. Really, be quiet with your comparisons until you've learned who plays what.