[ultimateclassicrock.com]

I wonder if the stones would have asked more than jimmy's 18 thousand ???

( haha, santana for 750,- dollar )

I think Quill was overpaid.

ooh no,they were worth it

[www.youtube.com]

Santana at $750
Deal of the Day!

<<haha, santana for 750,- dollar>>

Why the Stones didn't play Woodstock? Probably because they didn't feel like it. They had other projects going on at the time, a tour to prepare for, and an album to finish.

Santana for $750? Understandable, since he wasn't a star at the time. The movie would give him his big breakthrough with wider audiences, along with other lower paid names on the list.

Wonder how much Kris Kristofferson was paid just to be booed off the stage.

I wander if they knew from each other what they got

__________________________

Quote
stonehearted
<<haha, santana for 750,- dollar>>

Why the Stones didn't play Woodstock? Probably because they didn't feel like it. They had other projects going on at the time, a tour to prepare for, and an album to finish.

Santana for $750? Understandable, since he wasn't a star at the time. The movie would give him his big breakthrough with wider audiences, along with other lower paid names on the list.

Wonder how much Kris Kristofferson was paid just to be booed off the stage.

Free booze and dope, he was one of the most expencive ones !!!!!!

Guess it was a good investement later on, for all of them

what happened with Iron Butterfly? ..

The Stones didn't play Woodstock, as they needed to blood Mick Taylor, and ensure he was properly rehearsed. The Hyde Park July 1969 gig highlighted a woefully under-rehearsed band.

sounds logical to me

They knew Altamont would be better.

They weren't invited.

R&B and Hippies never really mixed ....



ROCKMAN

maybe they were too expensive, it was a low budget festival.

Quote
Kurt
Santana at $750
Deal of the Day!

You got that right.

Around the time of Woodstock 15-18 August "Tonky Tonk Woman" was number "one" world wide so they could ask some $ more.......

__________________________

Grateful Dead should of been $22.50 not $2250.

The Doors said, "No" because their rule was "We only headline." Later Jim Morrison put it down as as "a bunch of young parasites being spoon-fed for three or four days" but admitted "that may be sour grapes because I wasn't there." (From Rich Weidman's book THE DOORS FAQ)

Procol Harum missed it, as Robin Trower's wife was expecting a child. They could've been bigger than AWSOP.

Maybe they weren't invited or maybe they had to finish Let It Bleed before the 1969 tour.

281000 Indian Rupees for Ravi Shankar.

at the voodoo lounge press conference in NY mick said they were not invited

Wasn't Mick filming Ned Kelly in Australia around this time..............and Keith was home I guess..............Anita just give birth to Marlon

__________________________

hahaha, in coins !!!!!!!!!!

Quote
tomcasagranda
The Stones didn't play Woodstock, as they needed to blood Mick Taylor, and ensure he was properly rehearsed. The Hyde Park July 1969 gig highlighted a woefully under-rehearsed band.

From the link - Reason: Filming a Forgotten Movie

The Rolling Stones declined because Mick Jagger was in Australia that summer, filming a forgotten movie called 'Ned Kelly.' You don't remember 'Ned Kelly'? It's the poorly received 1970 Tony Richardson-directed biopic of a 19th-century Australian bushranger. Also, Keith Richards' girlfriend Anita Pallenburg had just given birth to son Marlon that week in London.

Quote
More Hot Rocks
Grateful Dead should of been $22.50 not $2250.

See you in Chicago...

Their Greatest Rock and Roll Band in the World title was never meant to be tested in such a setting. Although besides Jimi, I think they could have cleaned the contenders off the list.

peace

Quote
2000 LYFH

Quote
tomcasagranda
The Stones didn't play Woodstock, as they needed to blood Mick Taylor, and ensure he was properly rehearsed. The Hyde Park July 1969 gig highlighted a woefully under-rehearsed band.

From the link - Reason: Filming a Forgotten Movie

The Rolling Stones declined because Mick Jagger was in Australia that summer, filming a forgotten movie called 'Ned Kelly.' You don't remember 'Ned Kelly'? It's the poorly received 1970 Tony Richardson-directed biopic of a 19th-century Australian bushranger. Also, Keith Richards' girlfriend Anita Pallenburg had just given birth to son Marlon that week in London.

But is it confirmed anywhere that they declined? I thought it was more like they weren't asked because of those reasons.

Can it be they declined cause Hendrix was the headline?