Tell Me :
Talk
I didn't start this thread. I along with many stones fan appreciated the historical significance of The Beatles in the context of the Stones. And vice versa. So you are the judge of who is a true stones fan? Nice to be in middle school again. And Mr. Savage is fooling no one who has been on this board for a long time, it is mickscary, aka Mr. Done Deal. Not sure how much he really knows about anything.
I don't mind his Stones devotion but his politics are
abysmal. I mean even the name Savage….ugh.
That is a mystery to you and no one else because...?
Your "kind" can't resist with the political jabs, er. Must be ingrained. Keep it up and I report you
I thought the 5th Beatle was Murray the K.
I don't want to enter a political discussion, but your very username is a political
jab every time you post. Any third party can just Google MS hatemonger, or MS racist, and see what he is about.
Perhaps because some people like to talk about bands other than the Stones with Stones fans?
Seems a simple concept.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
jjo
()
Date: March 7, 2014 20:50
whitem8 --- it seems mr savage is a true Stones fan, knows much more than you , and wants you to keep your beatles on a beatles site which would be nice!!!!
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
stonehearted
()
Date: March 7, 2014 20:53
^ I'm sure that would be a DONE deal--so long as mr savage keeps his Clash on a Clash site.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2014-03-07 20:53 by stonehearted.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2014-03-07 20:53 by stonehearted.
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
michaelsavage
()
Date: March 7, 2014 20:53
Well I do feel that way but who is mick scarey?
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
mtaylor
()
Date: March 7, 2014 22:09
Or was it Macca that ruined it all - I guess it was Macca against the other ones, so why blame Lennon? Explain.Quote
michaelsavageQuote
GasLightStreetQuote
JumpinJackOLantern
I will always love the Beatles, but I will never forgive them for quitting on their fans. I really blame John. They brought much joy to the world until that self serving and self destructive bastard Lennon destroyed it all.
Explain how The Beatles "quit on their fans".
Oh wait.
Nevermind.
I am just glad they went away...
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
NICOS
()
Date: March 7, 2014 22:24
It was the fifth Beatle who ruined it all...........
__________________________
__________________________
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
mtaylor
()
Date: March 7, 2014 22:34
Linda or Yoko? women normally ruin it all....Quote
NICOS
It was the fifth Beatle who ruined it all...........
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
whitem8
()
Date: March 7, 2014 23:00
Quote
jjo
whitem8 --- it seems mr savage is a true Stones fan, knows much more than you , and wants you to keep your beatles on a beatles site which would be nice!!!!
I didn't start this thread. I along with many stones fan appreciated the historical significance of The Beatles in the context of the Stones. And vice versa. So you are the judge of who is a true stones fan? Nice to be in middle school again. And Mr. Savage is fooling no one who has been on this board for a long time, it is mickscary, aka Mr. Done Deal. Not sure how much he really knows about anything.
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
MKjan
()
Date: March 7, 2014 23:05
Quote
whitem8Quote
jjo
whitem8 --- it seems mr savage is a true Stones fan, knows much more than you , and wants you to keep your beatles on a beatles site which would be nice!!!!
I didn't start this thread. I along with many stones fan appreciated the historical significance of The Beatles in the context of the Stones. And vice versa. So you are the judge of who is a true stones fan? Nice to be in middle school again. And Mr. Savage is fooling no one who has been on this board for a long time, it is mickscary, aka Mr. Done Deal. Not sure how much he really knows about anything.
I don't mind his Stones devotion but his politics are
abysmal. I mean even the name Savage….ugh.
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
stonehearted
()
Date: March 8, 2014 00:38
Why did they do it in the road?
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
GasLightStreet
()
Date: March 8, 2014 17:22
Quote
michaelsavage
Well I do feel that way but who is mick scarey?
That is a mystery to you and no one else because...?
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
michaelsavage
()
Date: March 8, 2014 18:09
Quote
MKjanQuote
whitem8Quote
jjo
whitem8 --- it seems mr savage is a true Stones fan, knows much more than you , and wants you to keep your beatles on a beatles site which would be nice!!!!
I didn't start this thread. I along with many stones fan appreciated the historical significance of The Beatles in the context of the Stones. And vice versa. So you are the judge of who is a true stones fan? Nice to be in middle school again. And Mr. Savage is fooling no one who has been on this board for a long time, it is mickscary, aka Mr. Done Deal. Not sure how much he really knows about anything.
I don't mind his Stones devotion but his politics are
abysmal. I mean even the name Savage….ugh.
Your "kind" can't resist with the political jabs, er. Must be ingrained. Keep it up and I report you
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
jjo
()
Date: March 8, 2014 21:20
whitem8 who is mickscary whatever that is and what does done deal mean ?
You seem to be judging this Savage guy, so enjoy middle school.
You seem to be judging this Savage guy, so enjoy middle school.
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: March 8, 2014 21:44
Quote
mtaylorLinda or Yoko? women normally ruin it all....Quote
NICOS
It was the fifth Beatle who ruined it all...........
I thought the 5th Beatle was Murray the K.
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
whitem8
()
Date: March 8, 2014 21:54
No, George Martin. John, George, and Paul have all said they didn't really even like Murray the K!
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
stonesrule
()
Date: March 8, 2014 22:00
Kids, could you take this Beatles topic elsewhere?
It's becoming tedious.
It's becoming tedious.
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
NICOS
()
Date: March 8, 2014 22:08
Yes, let's rename it to Stones v Beatles and a start all over again...........
__________________________
__________________________
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
MKjan
()
Date: March 9, 2014 22:10
Quote
michaelsavageQuote
MKjanQuote
whitem8Quote
jjo
whitem8 --- it seems mr savage is a true Stones fan, knows much more than you , and wants you to keep your beatles on a beatles site which would be nice!!!!
I didn't start this thread. I along with many stones fan appreciated the historical significance of The Beatles in the context of the Stones. And vice versa. So you are the judge of who is a true stones fan? Nice to be in middle school again. And Mr. Savage is fooling no one who has been on this board for a long time, it is mickscary, aka Mr. Done Deal. Not sure how much he really knows about anything.
I don't mind his Stones devotion but his politics are
abysmal. I mean even the name Savage….ugh.
Your "kind" can't resist with the political jabs, er. Must be ingrained. Keep it up and I report you
I don't want to enter a political discussion, but your very username is a political
jab every time you post. Any third party can just Google MS hatemonger, or MS racist, and see what he is about.
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
michaelsavage
()
Date: March 11, 2014 22:52
Keep it up and I report you Mr hater
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: March 11, 2014 22:56
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
michaelsavage
Well I do feel that way but who is mick scarey?
That is a mystery to you and no one else because...?
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
MKjan
()
Date: March 14, 2014 17:18
Mr. Hater would be a fitting name for the real michael savage.His racist, homophobic, hate filled comments are well known. I am not a member of his target rants, I just don't tolerate such hatred.It's disgusting.
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
michaelsavage
()
Date: March 14, 2014 19:31
Wrong. he is level headed and speaks up because he knows the USA is going down the drain unless things get fixed. Would LOVE to see him as the President
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
BlackHat
()
Date: March 14, 2014 19:45
I feel sorry for those people who think you that to love the Rolling Stones you have to hate the Beatles. How narrow minded. I mean I love the Rolling Stones, just not as much as I love The Beatles. Mickscarey or whatever he calls himself these days has some sort of anger management issue.
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
michaelsavage
()
Date: March 14, 2014 19:59
So then talk to him about it.
Me? I just never "got" the Beatles. Simple as that. Very pop/elevator-like. Incredibly overrated. Why not share the love for that group on their site? My opinion.
Me? I just never "got" the Beatles. Simple as that. Very pop/elevator-like. Incredibly overrated. Why not share the love for that group on their site? My opinion.
Re: Beatles v Stones
Posted by:
BlackHat
()
Date: March 14, 2014 20:04
Quote
michaelsavage
So then talk to him about it.
Me? I just never "got" the Beatles. Simple as that. Very pop/elevator-like. Incredibly overrated. Why not share the love for that group on their site? My opinion.
Perhaps because some people like to talk about bands other than the Stones with Stones fans?
Seems a simple concept.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
00MC , 1badgator , big4 , Boett , BOW2007 , CaptainAcid , Doxa , edopao , eibert , esqcjh , hockenheim95 , hot stuff , jsz1002 , llsbsk , mattstones , maumau , SoulSurvivor1990 , spunky , Stilllife09 , Stonesfan2146 , The Sicilian , thecitadel , TurningToGold2 , Wolfgang
Guests:
1541
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10