For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
olorin
Would never happen, as Keith doesn't like Bowie.
Plus I'd rather twice for two full Stones and Bowie gigs (if Bowie ever tours), rather than once for half a Stones gig and half a Bowie gig.
Quote
Stoneage
I actually think there's some vitality left in Bowie. He's still a creative artist and it looks as he can't be anything else. Whether he's active or not. The Stones in 2013 is basically a nostalgia act; and has been for decades.
So it would be a mismatch from almost every point of view. He could do a guestspot though. But Sir Michael seems to prefer younger acts as guestartists.
Quote
benroyblenkle
why don't Bowie and the Stones do a 2013 tour together!
that would be hot as hell
I wish I wish I wish
could it happen???
Quote
whitem8
"had" is the operative word. Bowie and The Stones will never tour together. Keith is full of macho bravado, so his acidic comments regarding Bowie should be taken with a grain of salt. It is funny how Keith often comes across as very insecure and jealous of other artists of good music. But also I suspect a bit of territorial jealousy that could very well stem back to Jagger's affair with Bowie and Bowie actually putting his toe into the Stones with Its Only Rock and Roll. Who knows what the scene was like back then. A narcotic Keith, cooped up with his cronies, and Jagger and Bowie experimenting with each other.
Bowie and The Stones deserve their own tours. Too much information for one show. They need and deserve separate nights.