For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
The GR
Remember the ES repoted the Stones had broken up......1983
Quote
BrueQuote
The GR
Remember the ES repoted the Stones had broken up......1983
They did break up. Then they got back together six years later baybee!
Quote
Sleepy CityQuote
BrueQuote
The GR
Remember the ES repoted the Stones had broken up......1983
They did break up. Then they got back together six years later baybee!
Quote
Edith Grove
Is the Evening Standard anything like the News Of The World ?
Quote
crumbling_mice
It would be the Hyde Park festival then.
Quote
Edith Grove
Question for Londoners, or anyone else that is more knowledgeable about Hyde Park than I am:
I assume that Ronnie is (supposedly) talking about "re-creating" the show at Hyde Park itself.
Do you think that Hyde Park is currently capable of hosting an event such as this, particularly if it was a free show?
I'm assuming that, free or not, there could be many more people wanting to see the Stones than in '69.
I'm basically familiar with the area, having run a few miles in Hyde Park/Kensington Gardens during my stay there in '03, but I have to wonder about it's ability to host a massive crowd the Stones might draw in this day & age.
What do ya'll think?
Quote
Edith Grove
Question for Londoners, or anyone else that is more knowledgeable about Hyde Park than I am:
I assume that Ronnie is (supposedly) talking about "re-creating" the show at Hyde Park itself.
Do you think that Hyde Park is currently capable of hosting an event such as this, particularly if it was a free show?
I'm assuming that, free or not, there could be many more people wanting to see the Stones than in '69.
I'm basically familiar with the area, having run a few miles in Hyde Park/Kensington Gardens during my stay there in '03, but I have to wonder about it's ability to host a massive crowd the Stones might draw in this day & age.
What do ya'll think?
Quote
Edith Grove
Question for Londoners, or anyone else that is more knowledgeable about Hyde Park than I am:
I assume that Ronnie is (supposedly) talking about "re-creating" the show at Hyde Park itself.
Do you think that Hyde Park is currently capable of hosting an event such as this, particularly if it was a free show?
I'm assuming that, free or not, there could be many more people wanting to see the Stones than in '69.
I'm basically familiar with the area, having run a few miles in Hyde Park/Kensington Gardens during my stay there in '03, but I have to wonder about it's ability to host a massive crowd the Stones might draw in this day & age.
What do ya'll think?
Quote
James Kirk
You guys are amazing. You all want the Stones to be active in 2012, but one of them confirms that plans are starting to take shape you guys are all negative about it...I don't get it.
Provided health doesn't become an issue the Stones will be active in 2012.
Quote
Gazza
I doubt he literally means to re-create it.
maybe we love the stones so much that we don't want them getting up on stage and embarrassing themselves?Quote
mickscareyQuote
James Kirk
You guys are amazing. You all want the Stones to be active in 2012, but one of them confirms that plans are starting to take shape you guys are all negative about it...I don't get it.
Provided health doesn't become an issue the Stones will be active in 2012.
Excatly. So many so-called fans who do not want them to tour. Figure that!
Quote
Edith Grove
Is the Evening Standard anything like the News Of The World ?
Quote
mickscareyQuote
James Kirk
You guys are amazing. You all want the Stones to be active in 2012, but one of them confirms that plans are starting to take shape you guys are all negative about it...I don't get it.
Provided health doesn't become an issue the Stones will be active in 2012.
Excatly. So many so-called fans who do not want them to tour. Figure that!