Tell Me :
Talk
well, thank you.
you came up with a pretty reliable source and i can now say that that woolley character of that little music webpage down under is in denial and living thirtyeight years in the past.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010-05-25 23:00 by open-g.
Rockman, will Australia please take back Rupert Murdoch already?
It's all (Stones) propaganda to promote EOMS and the upcoming 50th Birthday Tour (2011-2012).
Mr.Fancyman
wait a minute, are you calling me an idiot for telling about Uncut's report? is that what your doing?
I'm jumping in here unasked, but, WTF.
I think he is actually taking to task Mr. Fancyman's statement,
"It's all (Stones) propaganda to promote EOMS and the upcoming 50th Birthday Tour (2011-2012)."
I agree that is a moronic observation.
No no ,Palace she didn't mean you.
Addicted was at Mr.Fancyman's (indeed moronic) assumption that it could be some promotion.
but jeeeezz, after all the worldwide media buzz by UMG and the Stones personaly - how could anyone think that Charlie story is promotion?
not fancy style at all, Mr.Fancyman!
Sorry Palace m'lady...and thank you!
Thank you, sorry, and I will remain quiet on the subject now.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Rolling Stones deny latest Australian claims that Charlie Watts is quitting
Posted by:
open-g
()
Date: May 25, 2010 22:59
Quote
urbanjungle90Quote
open-g
>>Besides, hasn't he threatened to quit after every tour since 1972?<<
No, not even once!
should you not agree, make sure you have a reliable source to quote.
Timeisonourside.com, just after July 26 1972.
"Charlie: I got off the plane in '72 and said No fcking more because I don't actually like touring and I don't like living out of suitcases. I hate being away from home. I always do tours thinking they're the last one, and at the end of them I always leave the band."
well, thank you.
you came up with a pretty reliable source and i can now say that that woolley character of that little music webpage down under is in denial and living thirtyeight years in the past.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010-05-25 23:00 by open-g.
Re: charlie not quitting
Posted by:
NICOS
()
Date: May 24, 2010 14:44
Why should he want to quit ......for doing nothing?
It's 5 years ago they released a new album and 4 years back they plated live.....give me a job like this
40 years hanging around and 8 years working (CW)
__________________________
It's 5 years ago they released a new album and 4 years back they plated live.....give me a job like this
40 years hanging around and 8 years working (CW)
__________________________
Re: charlie not quitting
Posted by:
gimmelittledrink
()
Date: May 24, 2010 18:41
That's what he's said. Even if he wanted to quit, there's no need to because the band is so inactive.
Re: charlie not quitting
Posted by:
Justin
()
Date: May 24, 2010 19:13
Plus I think he realized that getting out of the house and being active would do him some good. After his cancer treatment, he realized that lounging around the house too much would only slow him down quicker.
Re: charlie not quitting
Posted by:
71Tele
()
Date: May 24, 2010 22:14
Quote
Rockman
Bloody Aussies....
Rockman, will Australia please take back Rupert Murdoch already?
Charlie stays (of course)
Posted by:
Palace Revolution 2000
()
Date: May 25, 2010 13:14
Uncut magazine reports on the Stones issuing an official statement denying the Australian rumor about him leaving.
Re: Charlie stays (of course)
Posted by:
with sssoul
()
Date: May 25, 2010 13:16
more details here: [www.iorr.org]
Re: Charlie stays (of course)
Posted by:
mrfancyman
()
Date: May 25, 2010 13:29
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000
Uncut magazine reports on the Stones issuing an official statement denying the Australian rumor about him leaving.
It's all (Stones) propaganda to promote EOMS and the upcoming 50th Birthday Tour (2011-2012).
Mr.Fancyman
Re: Charlie stays (of course)
Posted by:
Addicted
()
Date: May 25, 2010 13:47
Jeeeezzz, another conspiracy theorist!
In case you didn't get it, it's that Australian journalist, with the silly wig and wolly name - Cashmere - that lashed out yet another story full of lies. That's a proven fact and only idiots will even try to discuss that.
In case you didn't get it, it's that Australian journalist, with the silly wig and wolly name - Cashmere - that lashed out yet another story full of lies. That's a proven fact and only idiots will even try to discuss that.
Re: Charlie stays (of course)
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: May 25, 2010 13:53
Cashmere again? What a J/&%&rk!
Re: Charlie stays (of course)
Posted by:
Palace Revolution 2000
()
Date: May 26, 2010 00:05
Quote
Addicted
Jeeeezzz, another conspiracy theorist!
In case you didn't get it, it's that Australian journalist, with the silly wig and wolly name - Cashmere - that lashed out yet another story full of lies. That's a proven fact and only idiots will even try to discuss that.
wait a minute, are you calling me an idiot for telling about Uncut's report? is that what your doing?
Re: Charlie stays (of course)
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: May 26, 2010 00:18
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000Quote
Addicted
Jeeeezzz, another conspiracy theorist!
In case you didn't get it, it's that Australian journalist, with the silly wig and wolly name - Cashmere - that lashed out yet another story full of lies. That's a proven fact and only idiots will even try to discuss that.
wait a minute, are you calling me an idiot for telling about Uncut's report? is that what your doing?
I'm jumping in here unasked, but, WTF.
I think he is actually taking to task Mr. Fancyman's statement,
"It's all (Stones) propaganda to promote EOMS and the upcoming 50th Birthday Tour (2011-2012)."
I agree that is a moronic observation.
Re: Charlie stays (of course)
Posted by:
open-g
()
Date: May 26, 2010 01:02
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000Quote
Addicted
Jeeeezzz, another conspiracy theorist!
In case you didn't get it, it's that Australian journalist, with the silly wig and wolly name - Cashmere - that lashed out yet another story full of lies. That's a proven fact and only idiots will even try to discuss that.
wait a minute, are you calling me an idiot for telling about Uncut's report? is that what your doing?
No no ,Palace she didn't mean you.
Addicted was at Mr.Fancyman's (indeed moronic) assumption that it could be some promotion.
but jeeeezz, after all the worldwide media buzz by UMG and the Stones personaly - how could anyone think that Charlie story is promotion?
not fancy style at all, Mr.Fancyman!
Re: Charlie stays (of course)
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: May 26, 2010 01:11
Quote
open-gQuote
Palace Revolution 2000Quote
Addicted
Jeeeezzz, another conspiracy theorist!
In case you didn't get it, it's that Australian journalist, with the silly wig and wolly name - Cashmere - that lashed out yet another story full of lies. That's a proven fact and only idiots will even try to discuss that.
wait a minute, are you calling me an idiot for telling about Uncut's report? is that what your doing?
No no ,Palace she didn't mean you.
Addicted was at Mr.Fancyman's (indeed moronic) assumption that it could be some promotion.
but jeeeezz, after all the worldwide media buzz by UMG and the Stones personaly - how could anyone think that Charlie story is promotion?
not fancy style at all, Mr.Fancyman!
Sorry Palace m'lady...and thank you!
Re: Charlie stays (of course)
Posted by:
melillo
()
Date: May 26, 2010 02:40
how would charlie leaving help promote EOMS?
Re: Charlie stays (of course)
Posted by:
open-g
()
Date: May 26, 2010 02:47
>>Sorry Palace m'lady...and thank you!<<
did I confuse you? sorry if so, lets get this straight.
Palace Revolution 2000 is a male, I believe.
Addicted is a female, I'm quite sure.
did I confuse you? sorry if so, lets get this straight.
Palace Revolution 2000 is a male, I believe.
Addicted is a female, I'm quite sure.
Re: Charlie stays (of course)
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: May 26, 2010 03:14
Quote
open-g
>>Sorry Palace m'lady...and thank you!<<
did I confuse you? sorry if so, lets get this straight.
Palace Revolution 2000 is a male, I believe.
Addicted is a female, I'm quite sure.
Thank you, sorry, and I will remain quiet on the subject now.
Re: Charlie stays (of course)
Posted by:
Palace Revolution 2000
()
Date: May 26, 2010 12:59
I'm a guy, and obviously a bit slow on the uptake too, LOL
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Big Al , davidestrada , eibert , hobshobs1 , Mack Jigger , midimannz , MJAGGER123 , Mr.Soul , Papo , Peterh , stonesmuziekfan , Topi , wolundamo , z , zwilling
Guests:
1437
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10