For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Bliss
>>BG subsequently stabbed Mick T in the back by selling his story to the Daily Mail - and the newspaper altered it to make it as sensational as possible. Mick T is now considering legal action because of the slanderous nature of the article
How do you know this? The article was published in the last day or so. Were Mick's quotes inaccurate? The photo showed his living circumstances and anyone can see he is living modestly, but is not derelict. It's possible that the comments about the interior of Mick's house and the unpaid bills are untrue. If Mick has the money to sue the Daily Mail for libel, then he must have the means to sue the Stones for royalty payments.
Quote
Lightnin'
Retired Dog, Taylor has always stated that the argument used by the Stones i.c. that from '81 they did not have to split the royalty income with him anymore because he was not part of the new agreement with the distributor/licensee they just signed with, would just NOT hold up in court.
But, as already indicated, it would have cost Taylor dearly to get a judge to review the case. He was also hoping for many years that it would be possible to get things straightened out by talking to Mick J and Keith directly. (Mick J promised him once he would take action to reinstate Taylor's royalties. Keith has admitted to him in private: I know we owe you).
In other words: Taylor seems to have a pretty good legal insight indeed, even though he has never been in law school. The Stones never offered to buy him out and throughout his career Taylor has always had to go on the road or do sessionwork to make ends meet.
Quote
Lightnin'
Retired Dog, Taylor has always stated that the argument used by the Stones i.c. that from '81 they did not have to split the royalty income with him anymore because he was not part of the new agreement with the distributor/licensee they just signed with, would just NOT hold up in court.
But, as already indicated, it would have cost Taylor dearly to get a judge to review the case.
Quote
CBII
Like I said before, WE don't know what the exact details of this situation really is. The Legal system is the place to find truth since that's where something like this will really be determined.
Quote
If you believe the article, Taylor said he would argue with them a lot. That does not help his case. And, he did seem to throw a lot of mud at both Keith and Mick also. What do you expect?
The fact is, he put himself in this position. He did very little with his talents for almost 35 years. Now he wants everyone to feel sorry for him (given doing the interview and the content).
Sure, it would be nice if they gave him some money- but that gets harder with what he says about our boys.I am sure Jagger does not like him saying he did not give him credit for writing songs. Pissing off Keith and Jagger will not help your case.
Though, talking about the lows of the band is in vogue with them all recently- mainly for money.
Quote
boogie69Quote
If you believe the article, Taylor said he would argue with them a lot. That does not help his case. And, he did seem to throw a lot of mud at both Keith and Mick also. What do you expect?
The fact is, he put himself in this position. He did very little with his talents for almost 35 years. Now he wants everyone to feel sorry for him (given doing the interview and the content).
Sure, it would be nice if they gave him some money- but that gets harder with what he says about our boys.I am sure Jagger does not like him saying he did not give him credit for writing songs. Pissing off Keith and Jagger will not help your case.
Though, talking about the lows of the band is in vogue with them all recently- mainly for money.
I think he has gotten what is owed. IF he did not, he should do something about it and quit whinning like some people are.
What he says about "our boys"? Are you f-ucking kidding me? Is he serious, does he really think what Mick T. has said justifies, or is a valid excuse, for Mick and Keith's behavior in any way? I suppose people like this who like their music so much think there is justification for all their bad behavior. It doesn't matter what Mick T. says, or how he has lived his life, if he is owed money by the Stones, again IF, then they should pay him, end of story. What he does with it afterwards, if he pisses it away or whatever, is not their problem. But if they legally owe him they should pay, and there is no justification not too. How would this guy feel if he quit a job and his boss refused to give him his last paycheck because of something he said, or how he lived his life? I can't believe what the sheep on this board come up with sometimes.
Besides, regardless of what he has said over the years, he has still shown unbelievable restraint in keeping his mouth shut. I'm sure there is plenty he could say about them, especially in a tell-all book, which he has yet to do, and which I think he should. AFTER he gets what he is owed.
Quote
Turd On The Run
Mick Taylor is one of the Great Lost Boys of Rock and Roll.
He is old enough to know that Rock and Roll is a cruel game. He left the Stones 35 years ago even though Jagger verily begged him to stay...going so far as to supposedly offer him a 6 month sabbatical. I don't see Mick Jagger presenting that option to anyone he doesn't deem absolutely essential to the Stones. Jagger knew his worth. All the Stones - except Keith - thought his departure was regrettable and damaging to the band's music. That has all been documented, is on the record, and is unassailable.
All I read for months (years) after he shockingly (for me) left was that he deemed the Stones' demise a fait accompli and that he wanted to 'go in a new direction' and that he would form a supergroup with Jack Bruce, and that a new record was on its way. (I saw him play with the short-lived Jack Bruce Group and it sucked - rote mid-1970's self-indulgent prog-blues...the kind of music The Sex Pistols made instantly obsolete one year later). Instead he became a wastrel and squandered his potent gifts, while the Stones added Ronnie (less musical brilliance, more verve and attitude), smelled the Zeitgeist, entered a new Golden Age (Some Girls, Tatoo You) and rumbled on, adding to their incomparable legacy.
Instead of cleaning up or pushing himself to do the compelling work he purportedly left the Stones to pursue, Talyor chose to play the sideman to Dylan (great), Bruce (shit) and eventually just fumble his musical genius away in small pubs and druggy grime.
How many times did he have a chance to get himself together? Who knows? Pride would indicate that he could have pulled himself up, reigned in his demons, lost weight, re-dedicated himself to his craft, and cultivated the genius God bestowed upon him. That alone might have forced to Stones to respect him and his legacy more deeply...and perhaps pressure them to remunerate him for his contributions in a fair manner. Instead he shambles from one small-time gig to the next - fat, uninspired and partly broken..ruefully stating that he left the Stones to save himself...but for this?
We all love him...we would give anything to see him onstage again with the Stones or Jack Bruce or Bob Dylan or whatever musician would inspire him to soar - fit, committed, searing our minds with fluid lightning. But that won't happen. The Jack Bruce option is long gone, Bob Dylan has a killer band, and the Stones are pitiless. They eat the weak and kill the injured (Ronnie being the one spectacular, almost inexplicable exception). And Taylor has played the deferent, broken ex-sideman role perfectly.
What a sad spectacle. The legalities may be argued ad infinitum, but until Taylor gets himself in front of a judge with a professional attorney at his side and states his case in an organized and cogent manner all the noise is just that...noise.
In a perfect world Mick Taylor would be known as one of the greatest, most fluid Guitar Gods in the Rock pantheon, his canon would be filled with unforgettable moments, and his music would still be growing and vital to this day. Instead we get this article...
Quote
Turd On The Run
Mick Taylor is one of the Great Lost Boys of Rock and Roll.
He is old enough to know that Rock and Roll is a cruel game. He left the Stones 35 years ago even though Jagger verily begged him to stay...going so far as to supposedly offer him a 6 month sabbatical. I don't see Mick Jagger presenting that option to anyone he doesn't deem absolutely essential to the Stones. Jagger knew his worth. All the Stones - except Keith - thought his departure was regrettable and damaging to the band's music. That has all been documented, is on the record, and is unassailable.
All I read for months (years) after he shockingly (for me) left was that he deemed the Stones' demise a fait accompli and that he wanted to 'go in a new direction' and that he would form a supergroup with Jack Bruce, and that a new record was on its way. (I saw him play with the short-lived Jack Bruce Group and it sucked - rote mid-1970's self-indulgent prog-blues...the kind of music The Sex Pistols made instantly obsolete one year later). Instead he became a wastrel and squandered his potent gifts, while the Stones added Ronnie (less musical brilliance, more verve and attitude), smelled the Zeitgeist, entered a new Golden Age (Some Girls, Tatoo You) and rumbled on, adding to their incomparable legacy.
Instead of cleaning up or pushing himself to do the compelling work he purportedly left the Stones to pursue, Talyor chose to play the sideman to Dylan (great), Bruce (shit) and eventually just fumble his musical genius away in small pubs and druggy grime.
How many times did he have a chance to get himself together? Who knows? Pride would indicate that he could have pulled himself up, reigned in his demons, lost weight, re-dedicated himself to his craft, and cultivated the genius God bestowed upon him. That alone might have forced to Stones to respect him and his legacy more deeply...and perhaps pressure them to remunerate him for his contributions in a fair manner. Instead he shambles from one small-time gig to the next - fat, uninspired and partly broken..ruefully stating that he left the Stones to save himself...but for this?
We all love him...we would give anything to see him onstage again with the Stones or Jack Bruce or Bob Dylan or whatever musician would inspire him to soar - fit, committed, searing our minds with fluid lightning. But that won't happen. The Jack Bruce option is long gone, Bob Dylan has a killer band, and the Stones are pitiless. They eat the weak and kill the injured (Ronnie being the one spectacular, almost inexplicable exception). And Taylor has played the deferent, broken ex-sideman role perfectly.
What a sad spectacle. The legalities may be argued ad infinitum, but until Taylor gets himself in front of a judge with a professional attorney at his side and states his case in an organized and cogent manner all the noise is just that...noise.
In a perfect world Mick Taylor would be known as one of the greatest, most fluid Guitar Gods in the Rock pantheon, his canon would be filled with unforgettable moments, and his music would still be growing and vital to this day. Instead we get this article...