Tell Me :
Talk
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
Rock'n'roller
()
Date: July 12, 2007 14:47
Only Kidding!
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
1962
()
Date: July 12, 2007 14:48
Bad boring joke. Test it, they are on tour these days.
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
Tantekäthe
()
Date: July 12, 2007 14:53
Not too old to rock'n'roll, but some of them sometimes - to quote Morrissey (or who was it?) - "too drunk to @#$%&".
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
Koen
()
Date: July 12, 2007 14:59
Tantekäthe Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not too old to rock'n'roll, but some of them
> sometimes - to quote Morrissey (or who was it?) -
> "too drunk to @#$%&".
Dead Kennedies?
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not too old to rock'n'roll, but some of them
> sometimes - to quote Morrissey (or who was it?) -
> "too drunk to @#$%&".
Dead Kennedies?
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
ablett
()
Date: July 12, 2007 15:00
Thought provoking thread again.....
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
Tantekäthe
()
Date: July 12, 2007 15:02
Koen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tantekäthe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Not too old to rock'n'roll, but some of them
> > sometimes - to quote Morrissey (or who was it?)
> -
> > "too drunk to @#$%&".
>
> Dead Kennedies?
Koen, you are 100% right.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Tantekäthe Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Not too old to rock'n'roll, but some of them
> > sometimes - to quote Morrissey (or who was it?)
> -
> > "too drunk to @#$%&".
>
> Dead Kennedies?
Koen, you are 100% right.
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
satisfaction2
()
Date: July 12, 2007 15:29
Nobody is too old for Rock n` Roll!
It`s a way of live.
You have the feeling or not !
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-07-12 15:30 by satisfaction2.
It`s a way of live.
You have the feeling or not !
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-07-12 15:30 by satisfaction2.
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
monkeyman07
()
Date: July 12, 2007 15:34
They are not old to rocknroll , im 13 years old , and im not too old to rocknroll , they are 63 years old , why not?
They have the spirit!!
wipeacdc@hotmail.com
never too old or young to rocknroll!!!!!!
They have the spirit!!
wipeacdc@hotmail.com
never too old or young to rocknroll!!!!!!
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
Meise
()
Date: July 12, 2007 15:38
They're like wine - the older the better .... never too old to rock
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
Spud
()
Date: July 12, 2007 15:40
Rock N Roll is a state of mind I suppose...and they are still in that state of mind.
Some people are "too old to Rock N Roll" from birth ;^)
Some people are "too old to Rock N Roll" from birth ;^)
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
gia43
()
Date: July 12, 2007 16:01
yes, they are too old to rock'n'roll but they're too young to die... so what else is there to do? ...
Who the f*ck is Mick Jagger?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-07-12 16:02 by gia43.
Who the f*ck is Mick Jagger?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-07-12 16:02 by gia43.
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
Mr Jimmy
()
Date: July 12, 2007 17:50
Can't believe I'm writing on this stupid bloody thread, but...
Anyone that has seen a Europe 2007 show KNOWS that the Stones are definitely not too old to rock and roll!
_____________________________________________________
What's your favourite flavour?...........Cherry Red!!
Anyone that has seen a Europe 2007 show KNOWS that the Stones are definitely not too old to rock and roll!
_____________________________________________________
What's your favourite flavour?...........Cherry Red!!
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
ablett
()
Date: July 12, 2007 17:52
"Anyone that has seen a Europe 2007 show KNOWS that the Stones are definitely not too old to rock and roll!"
What the same tour that was on the verge of collapse due to a 'near to death' keith???
Good point m8
AND its a stupid thread.....
What the same tour that was on the verge of collapse due to a 'near to death' keith???
Good point m8
AND its a stupid thread.....
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
LOGIE
()
Date: July 12, 2007 18:10
...seemingly by August 27th they will be.
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
KingBee
()
Date: July 12, 2007 18:12
First time asked - probably 1969?
Or 1966?
Gimme a clue!
Or 1966?
Gimme a clue!
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
RollingStonesFan
()
Date: July 12, 2007 18:26
My answer would have been: NO
Re: Are the Stones too old to rock and roll?
Posted by:
55 Rusty
()
Date: July 12, 2007 19:07
are some too old to enjoy it ? - never
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
ChrisL , dishevelmentblues , Paw , philrock90 , Purplevienna1 , Reus23 , RollingFreak , shattered1978 , siette , spiderman , spunky , TooTight , Topi , Whale , yorkshirestone
Guests:
1647
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10