lodge wrote:
(A) "If you talk to people not to much into music, they just nodding: Oh these old guys still play, they can't play anyway."
Yes, many say that- not all of them, of course. But the success of any music act basically depends on people who are into music, one way or another.
(
"And also the press was not always very nice."
Never it was always very nice IMO.
(C) "Things read about that they do not play life, Mick does not even sing live and all that crap make some people believe that the whole thing's not worth it."
I think that this crap was very "strong" during Voodoo Lounge tour. If i remember correctly even "Spiegel" published an article about "playback", then. But VL was the most attended tour in the entire music history... And the reviews as for their performances were very positive. I'm trying to say, again, that this crap influences adversely people who basically don't even care about the Stones or rock music.
Maybe 20 million people all over the USA don't even know what "the Stones" is. Maybe another 30 million think that the Stones aren't great. Maybe 2 million people in the US believe that is not Mick the person who sings on stage, but Elvis, who still lives, but he does keep the secret for some taxis reasons... But who cares about this kingdom of stupidity and ignorance, after having seen that in 2005/06 only the Stones are able to attract 2,200,000 northamericans during a tour??