Erik_Snow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> It is indeed a boot, but it sounds official,
> because of the fantastic quality...both in terms
> of material and sound-mix.


Eric, i knew it was unofficial,boot to call it a boot is a little welloff my beaten track since it's in the studio and it's not like somebody in the audience recording the show.

>> What is the exact source and or reason behind a studio album being realeased like this. <<

LoFL - easy there! no need to get all ruffled. the term "bootleg" doesn't only refer to concert recordings.
there are lots of bootlegs comprised of studio outtakes/early takes/rehearsals.
you can think of them as "studio albums" if you want, but if it's not an official release
that the artists (or at least their record company) decided to put out, then it's a bootleg.
why do these come about? because someone who has access to the tapes decides to "liberate" them,
often because they can sell them to bootleg manufacturers/distributors.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-01-14 23:34 by with sssoul.

stonesfrk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Eric, i knew it was unofficial,boot to call it a
> boot is a little welloff my beaten track since
> it's in the studio and it's not like somebody in
> the audience recording the show.

Oh, I see. But "Bootleg" means (to me anyway) an unofficial record, no-matter if it's an audience recording or a soundboard recording.
Bootleg...the term comes from the American expression "bootleg whiskey", from the time where they had to hide the whiskey in their boot, as it was illegal to produce liqour there..for a while.

baby you're too much for me! keith is fantastic on it!

with sssoul Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >> What is the exact source and or reason behind a
> studio album being realeased like this. <<
>
> LoFL - easy there! no need to get all ruffled.
> the term "bootleg" doesn't only refer to concert
> recordings.
> there are lots of bootlegs comprised of studio
> outtakes/early takes/rehearsals.
> you can think of them as "studio albums" if you
> want, but if it's not an official release
> that the artists (or at least their record
> company) decided to put out, then it's a bootleg.
> why do these come about? because someone who has
> access to the tapes decides to "liberate" them,
> often because they can sell them to bootleg
> manufacturers/distributors.


LoFL to you, i'm not ruffled here just stating my opinion. It sound's like i ruffled your feather's though,but thanx for the nice feedback,it was well stated.

The compiled list and the roadmap to finding these tracks -- i.e., guitars101.com (special thanks to jamesfdouglas) has been an incredible gift.... um, wow. I haven't found EVERY song listed, but I've found enough to keep me satisfied for the time being!

You guys are something else -- all this time, and I'd never even heard of stuff like Too Many Cooks!

What kind of Stones fan AM I??? One step above clueless, at present.

Thanks -- and I hope other people, not-in-the-know, will find this stuff too.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-01-20 07:52 by largelingerie.

No Spare Parts
We Had It All
Claudine

PECMAN

largelingerie Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The compiled list and the roadmap to finding these
> tracks -- i.e., guitars101.com (special thanks to
> jamesfdouglas) has been an incredible gift.... um,
> wow. I haven't found EVERY song listed, but I've
> found enough to keep me satisfied for the time
> being!
>
> You guys are something else -- all this time, and
> I'd never even heard of stuff like Too Many Cooks!
>
>
> What kind of Stones fan AM I??? One step above
> clueless, at present.
>
> Thanks -- and I hope other people,
> not-in-the-know, will find this stuff too.


Thanks, but don't thank me! I just found it. Find out who POSTED IT, and thank them!



[thepowergoats.com]

stonesfrk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> with sssoul Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > >> inever knew it was a boot,is it considered a
> > boot? <<
> >
> > well ... yeah! it's not an official release,
> ergo
> > it's a bootleg.
>
> Yeah but it's all studio stuff so either somebody
> ripped off the master's and reproduced it all or
> the Stones just released it for some odd reson.
> Since you know all about this sssoul. What is the
> exact source and or reason behind a studio album
> being realeased like this.


same as with pretty much every studio bootleg. In a single word - theft.

[thepowergoats.com]