Today he is high of healthy food & physical training... "Stone -s" age is another thing, but Mick has as good as always been on the right side. Maybe not in 1978 and at times, i.e ab 1980.
I could verify you get positively high by phys.training; undersigned have began a new life & now I am at the gym 4-5 times a week. No more geezer-fat or beer tummmy here. Pure muscles.
I have also tried drugs and those make you stupid, a physical wreck and poor. Alcohol no better than anything else. An occasional beer a month is my last unhealthy vice drug-wise (ok, a random chocolate bar & coffee as well...)
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-11-17 14:43 by Baboon Bro.
I think Micks being a health freak since around the 81 tour. He'd quit smoking by then and just wanted to look after himself. I think it's admirable. If he hadn't, then we'd just have a bloated wrinkly, weezing and puffing and panting round the stage. By changing direction, Mick has kept the band going in my opinion.
He's wiping his nose a fair bit on that film isn't he? From what I hear, there used to be bowls of coke sitting around. The shows are more predictable now but that was TRUE rock n roll back then. It's still good now but a much more polished Vegas style act.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-11-17 18:29 by georgeV.
Flashing forward, I thought Mick was high at the pay-per-view St. Louis gig in '97. Reasons why: he almost forgets to introduce Josh Redman before "Waiting on a Friend;" he stumbles upon introducing Dave Matthews, referring to a prior gig with him in Texas as a "big concrete place (i.e. Texas Motor Speedway);" and when they went to the b-stage, Mick yells at "Patrick" in a characteristic stoney way to "turn down the lights."
Big Al Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think Micks being a health freak since around > the 81 tour. He'd quit smoking by then and just > wanted to look after himself. I think it's > admirable. If he hadn't, then we'd just have a > bloated wrinkly, weezing and puffing and panting > round the stage. By changing direction, Mick has > kept the band going in my opinion.
But, let go at times in disguise, he has been a health freak since childhood,mhasnt he?
Big Al Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think Micks being a health freak since around > the 81 tour. He'd quit smoking by then and just > wanted to look after himself. I think it's > admirable. If he hadn't, then we'd just have a > bloated wrinkly, weezing and puffing and panting > round the stage. By changing direction, Mick has > kept the band going in my opinion.
Ian McLagan mentiones in his book that Jagger was drinking a lot in '81, and that a drunk Jagger isn't the best thing around. I personally think that eveytime you see Jagger chewing gum like a madman, he'd took a fix.
In Munich arena in 2003 he sure took aline a coke. The band was really slow, and the energy level was really low, including Jagger's. In the middle of Midnight Rambler, Jagger disappeared for two minutes, and he came back on the stage like a madman, running around like crazy, chewing his teeth out, and giving the best show I have seen in years. We were standing close to the stage with about 10 people, and we all looked at eachother and started laughing, it was that obvious.
Mick definitely did some drugs during the 70's, cocaine in particular, and I think this lasted until the '81/'82 tour. The last time he was really drunk that I remember reading about was when he recorded vocals for Too Much Blood.
Mathijs Wrote: ----------------------------------------------- > > In Munich arena in 2003 he sure took aline a > coke. The band was really slow, and the energy > level was really low, including Jagger's. In the > middle of Midnight Rambler, Jagger disappeared for > two minutes, and he came back on the stage like a > madman, running around like crazy, chewing his > teeth out, and giving the best show I have seen in > years. We were standing close to the stage with > about 10 people, and we all looked at eachother > and started laughing, it was that obvious. > > Mathijs