Re: Ya-ya's or Brussels Affair?
Date: October 18, 2006 16:37
> None of the above actually PHD. Brussels is still
> a very good boot It's because it lacks the special
> devilish Stones rock 'n roll crunch that can be
> heard on most '69-'70 recordings, some '75-'76
> recordings, certainly on many '78 recordings, a
> few '81-'82 recordings, almost no '89-'90
> recordings, MANY '94-'95 recordings, some handfuls
> of '97-'99 recordings, some '02-'03 recordings, a
> grea deal of the boots I've heard from this tour,
> not to mention what I witnessed in Horsens.
> Brussels just lacks it. Compare it to a boot like
> Sydney '73 (Rock 'n Roll Stew) and you'll know
> what I mean. Brussels is too perfect and there's
> many other boots I prefer instead. Casino Boogie
> '99, Rock 'n Roll Stew '73, Liver Than You'll Ever
> Be '69, Voodoo In Buenos Aires '95, Gorgeous Girls
> Redux '78 and Bridges To Argentina '98 to name but
> a few.
........yeah I totally don't get where you're coming from. I mean it's a matter of opinion but to me, Brussels '73 is one of the most devilish, evil sounding Stones recordings......the demon band with the horn section in full cry......