..or should the Stones Quit?

Dont think--charlie goes on another tour

Ron---just keep staying alive!
youll get it.

Mick , i think,je is do his solo--ones

---and keef---
dreaming on the riffs--back he does in 64---94

No one could replace them, not in 2006 at least. Perhaps in 1976 or so.

agree---76--78 -tours--are overrated

Yes, they should quit. If Charlie leaves that would be too much.

"make up your mind, 'cause I gotta go"

Havo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> agree---76--78 -tours--are overrated


No, I didn't mean that at all,
I meant...that when they were younger, and still had a career ahead, it would have made sense to try with a different guitarist or drummer.
Now, the Rolling Stones are so BIG, because it's those 4 guys still delivering the show. New blood wouldn't be welcomed.
I love the 78 tour...and 76 is good too.

Quit asking these pointless questions.

what???-----beast???

I know someone who could fill in one of those spots??????


MLC

MCDDTLC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I know someone who could fill in one of those
> spots??????
>
>
> MLC


Yeah, but do you know anyone with a good amount of vibrato?

...i guess i would take ronnie's spot...take one for the team...

"You've got to roll me"

No body,,,,,No one.....................!!!!!!!!!!!

I dont like the disrespect of this question, its only rock n roll but..............

If Charlie quits I don't think they should go on without him. But I bet they would, probably replacing him with Jim Keltner or Kenney Jones. I hope Ronnie stays in the band but gets demoted to rhythm guitarist and they get a lead guitarist who is still in top form such as Mick Taylor or Waddy Watchell.

How about the guitar player from SLAYER and the drummer from the Cantina Band in STAR WARS...


they CANT be replaced. There would undoubtedly still be Stones shows BUT these men would not have beed replaced. They would have retired and some competent player would be playing those parts for M & K.

this is a non sense topic
no stones without charlie ! and i do not want !!
time is over for a change, the band plays in 2007 or will stop, that's all.
Ronnie is elsewhere for a certain time now and was not replaced anyway. Mick could have been bored by his lack of profesionalism but he never made a comment about it and kept Woody in the band (imagine that the guy was not in the studio to record BB !!! amazing).

NO CHARLIE on the kit NO STONES,it worked for the Who not the from STONES.They barely recovered from losing Bill.In the beginning no one cared that Bill was gone,then I see people complaining about Darryl.No chance without Charlie ,it wouldn't be right!!!!!!

Nobody can replace them at this point.

No sense of going on its been a great ride. What else should they do?

ohnonotyouagain Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If Charlie quits I don't think they should go on
> without him. But I bet they would, probably
> replacing him with Jim Keltner or Kenney Jones. I
> hope Ronnie stays in the band but gets demoted to
> rhythm guitarist and they get a lead guitarist who
> is still in top form such as Mick Taylor or Waddy
> Watchell.

good call on jim keltner.

-



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-12-29 08:25 by cirrhosis.

zzzzzzzz Just leave it alone for once

Mindless questions for mindless people. Get a hold of yourself and shake really realy hard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

unfortunately it's a realistic question. however, noone has to replace charlie on recording, and he still *might* do some scaled back canada/europe/US dates perhaps? keltner, steve jerdan possibilities. they could keep ronnie but they would have to add an extra lead guitarist for the road. i don't think waddy would work...

RDNZL Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Mindless questions for mindless people. Get a hold
> of yourself and shake really realy
> hard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Agree! I still haven't heard an official statement saying "this is it". Untill then - this is totally un-interresting.

ohnonotyouagain Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
I
> hope Ronnie stays in the band but gets demoted to
> rhythm guitarist and they get a lead guitarist who
> is still in top form such as Mick Taylor or Waddy
> Watchell.


I totally agree with you. I've said it before, they should ask Waddy Wachtel to join them on stage. Ron can do Jagger's guitar parts. Let Waddy do the solos and backing vocals. We don't need Blondie anymore.

NO ONE !! EVER !!

Perhaps they should just form the "Everly Brothers 2"- as Keith thought they'd be forced to when Charlie had throath cancer... And of course they'd only do the set lists that would appeal to the hard core nut cases exclusively. And only club shows. And the tix woud be 5 pounds sterling. And everyone would have front row seating and brilliant sound, AND a stadium stage. And Mick would use a hose to water the old folks... If it makes you happy?

What comes next ?
Who replace Mick ?

this guy could be the answer to all their problems-
he'd be cheap, as well.



alternatively, get Blondie to double up on drums/guitar

Well I think they should give up the brand "Rolling Stones" then and go on with two different bands: 1) The Winos with special guest Mick jagger on vocals. And the Wandering Spirit line up with special guest Keith Richards on guitar....How is that?