phd wrote asking harm: "The papers I read in Milan Wednesday, including Corriere della Sera which I brought home, as well as TV, talked about 65,000."
Correct.
Jack Knife wrote:
(A) "Why were there so many empty seats at this show? I've never heard of one of their shows having 10, 000 unsold tickets! Are the Rolling Stones not big in Germany? Who would have sold out the stadium? Would U2 and Robbie Williams have done better?"
Calm yourself, Jack Knife! Also in 2003 there were a lot of unsold tickets in Germany. That's explainable. The Stones did an incredible number of gigs in Germany and Holland, since 1994/95. Much more than any other famous act, U2 and Robbie Williams included. It's logical to be some satiety there. Count two more factors: first, their ticket prices which are geting -unfortunately- higher and higher. Second, the World Cup. The Stones ALWAYS had some problems touring in countries in which WC took place. A lot of people were spending earlier their money for this event, which is expensive too. That's why the Stones had canceled Turin II gig in 1990 and Stade De France II in 1998. No big deal.
(
"I guess it's a good thing they canceled a lot of dates since they can't sell out the ones they have."
What do you mean? Maybe they had to cancel, in every case, one- two dates in Germany. But in the rest of Europe? Madrid, Barcelona, Sweeden, Belgium were sold out. Stade De France, olny 8,000 unsold tickets in the day of the cancelation. This gig would be sold out or near it, i guess. Athens was selling faster than in 1998. There are 500,000 tickets, sold but "lost", here...
(C) "It really is the last time and it really is all over now...."
Maybe, but only due to their age or to Charlie's health. If a band can attract MILLION of people on it's third tour in the last 9 years (not even a decade!), with these @#$%& ticket prices, after having played to 22 million people since 1989, then this band haven't reasons to quit. Not even to play in smaller venues. Only to reconsider some factors, like prices, number of gigs, etc.
I said it a million times, i say it once again. Attracting 4.5 million people in 2005/6, on a tour which takes place after a short break of just 3 years, is MORE REMARKABLE than playing to 6 million in 1989/90. After a break of 7 years, when everyone wanted to see the "rare" act.
During the seventies, when the Stones did tours every 3 years (Europe 1973, 1976- USA 1969, 1972, 1975, 1978) they attracted 300,000 or 600,000 people on every round. Now, even the "broken", "shattered" european tour will be for one million + people.
Their popularity after 42 years of career is a miracle. Their concerts are very good. Why so much "catastrophism" here? Even this tour is the end, it is a proud end!