Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: 123Next
Current Page: 1 of 3
Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: uz2bstoned ()
Date: May 10, 2006 14:28

Just to change topic for a while....I hear Bill Wynman lashing out again last few days....well i gotta to say the band is far better without him. Forget any issue except the music and listen. They are a different band for sure and a better one IMHO. Listen to Tokyo 90 JJF version. Then 4 years later in Tokyo again. Chalk and cheese. While the steel wheels version repeats the same refrain bar after bar, you could almost loop it and the last 2 minutes would sound the same! The VL version has creativity and no two bars are the same. Mr Jones is a funky player and has really added to the band.

My points being

1) Steel Wheels = Solid RNR without creativity

2) VL onwards = neverending funk and imagination on songs they have played bazillions of times



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-05-10 14:29 by uz2bstoned.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Koen ()
Date: May 10, 2006 14:36

More rock but less roll.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Riffbuk ()
Date: May 10, 2006 14:43

Exactly Koen !!

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Reptile ()
Date: May 10, 2006 14:43

That has nothing to do with the bass.

Keith played the riff different back then.

Now go listen to Brown Sugar from that era and Brown Sugar now and be quiet!

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: TooTough ()
Date: May 10, 2006 14:46

Koen Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> More rock but less roll.

No swinging without BillĀ“s bass.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: turd ()
Date: May 10, 2006 14:56

Who the hell is 'WYNMAN' ? There never was a 'Wynman' in the stones.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Reptile ()
Date: May 10, 2006 14:57

Bill Whineman.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: uz2bstoned ()
Date: May 10, 2006 15:34

Whatever. You think it has nothing to do with bass? Every band member feeds off others ideas.

There is more funk and originality to the music now. Wyman's playing didn't swing. It was static like he was on stage

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Reptile ()
Date: May 10, 2006 15:35

uz2bstoned Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wyman's playing didn't swing. It was static
> like he was on stage

That is the most redicoulus thing I've ever heard.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Date: May 10, 2006 15:40

Reptile said : "That is the most redicoulus thing I've ever heard"

I like Darryl, but Reptile's comment need to be repeated. It's an intelligent comment. And it's true smiling smiley

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: uz2bstoned ()
Date: May 10, 2006 15:48

Is that all you can say? I mean I'm trying to provoke a disscussion. The most redicoulus thing you've ever heard? Com'on. Goodnight

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Erik_Snow ()
Date: May 10, 2006 15:53

It's redicoulus because Wyman swinged as hell.
We can't start a discussion over for instance "omelett is best without eggs" either. It's wrong to begin with.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-05-10 15:55 by Erik_Snow.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: mttlacroix ()
Date: May 10, 2006 16:15

i think that both wyman and darryl have different styles, and i think that darryls pretty low in the bass anyways, so i dont see why anybody cares. but to be honest, wyman supposedly left due to old age, and thats fine, but he shouldnt keep slagging his old friends in the nesw now and then.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Reptile ()
Date: May 10, 2006 16:18

Stop saying such things.

The media manipulates what he says.

He's not a buisnessman like Mick.

He is thankful for his years with the Stones and they are still very close friends.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Raoul Duke ()
Date: May 10, 2006 16:26

Bill Wyman is worthless - utterly replaceable. That he is not a businessman like Mick is apparent. Maybe that's why he's so bitter.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Reptile ()
Date: May 10, 2006 16:27

Raoul Duke Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bill Wyman is worthless - utterly replaceable.
> That he is not a businessman like Mick is
> apparent. Maybe that's why he's so bitter.

He's not bitter. You obviously haven't read all the flattering things he said about the boys. Those parts of the interviews obviously are worthless to the Sun. He still does blues jams with them regularly.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Beelyboy ()
Date: May 10, 2006 16:31

yeah man, those first 33 years of the Stone were pretty wimped out...

so glad Darryl saved the day... nice to see someone who really gets what the stones are about...

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: shedooby ()
Date: May 10, 2006 16:41

Beelyboy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> yeah man, those first 33 years of the Stone were
> pretty wimped out...
>
> so glad Darryl saved the day... nice to see
> someone who really gets what the stones are
> about...


haha, right Beelyboy, I like that cynical touch on comments

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Elmo Lewis ()
Date: May 10, 2006 16:42

That's a bitter pill (bitter Bill) to swallow.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Lukester ()
Date: May 10, 2006 16:46

Raoul Duke Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bill Wyman is worthless - utterly replaceable.
> That he is not a businessman like Mick is
> apparent. Maybe that's why he's so bitter.


Whoa, Hunter, you're joking, right? ...please say you're joking.


worthless?

bitter?


I disagree.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: turd ()
Date: May 10, 2006 16:46

Beelyboy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> yeah man, those first 33 years of the Stone were
> pretty wimped out...
>
> so glad Darryl saved the day... nice to see
> someone who really gets what the stones are
> about...


Oh I agree - that Wynman, he was terrible, in fact everything the Stones ever did, albums, singles live performances were ruined because that Wynman couldn't 'rock'.
It's amazing the band never noticed this......

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Raoul Duke ()
Date: May 10, 2006 16:47

What the Stones are about: Mick, Keith, and Charlie. I get it. Do you?

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Muddyw ()
Date: May 10, 2006 17:25

Bill Wyman is a swinging rock 'n roll player... With him the groove was fantastic... Technically it's because he plays a note a fraction before the actually note should be played,before a drumkick from Charlie. A note can be played very precisely which would sound static, but if you play it a fraction earlier.. well, the results we can hear!
That's where the swing or roll comes from.. and that's unique... Not many bassplayers have that kind of style/technique whatever.

Darryl is technically a great bass player. Too bad he is low in the mix. And yes, the sound is different with him. I think The Stones should use his skills more, like they do live during some songs where he get's a little solo.

With Wyman you could concentrate easily on his parts, it's almost heaven to hear him playing with The Stones. With him it was like every Stone had a part in a song, every instrument was important. Nowadays they sound more like Mick, Ron, Keith and Charlie together in one take, and the bass parts are only functional, not creative or an important part of the songs.

Yes, I miss Bill a lot, the swing, the fantastic bass lines.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: mr edward ()
Date: May 10, 2006 17:27

Reptile Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
He still does blues jams with them regularly.

According to who?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-05-10 17:33 by mr edward.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: MCDDTLC ()
Date: May 10, 2006 17:32

Yes - don't underestimate the value of what Bill brought to the Stones during
his stay... I for one would like to see him return for a 70's night at the
Royal Albert Hall, doing music from Sticky Fingers, Exile on Main Street,
Goats Head Soup & IORR....

And there is another Ex - member who should get an invite to that night.....


MLC

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Elmo Lewis ()
Date: May 10, 2006 17:56

Before you start low-rating Bitter Bill, listen to the bass in "Miss You", "Start Me Up", or "Honky Tonk Women". Maybe "Just My Imagination" live. Just right, groovin' bass.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Lukester ()
Date: May 10, 2006 18:43

I forgot about the bass on Miss You...thanks Elmo, it really is out front.

I always loved the bass on "2000 Light Years From Home," but I'm guessing, since I am not a musician, that it's not a real complicated bass line running throughout the song....complicated or not, I love it.

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Leonard Keringer ()
Date: May 10, 2006 18:43

pure insanity

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: JumpingKentFlash ()
Date: May 10, 2006 18:44

Reptile Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bill Whineman.


That's a good one. I'll use that from now on.

JumpingKentFlash

Re: Stones Rock Harder Without Wynman
Posted by: Chas ()
Date: May 10, 2006 18:48

Yeah, the Stones rhythm section weas sure weak that first 25 years! The recent stuff is far superior for sure.

Goto Page: 123Next
Current Page: 1 of 3


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 1354
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home