Jake wrote:
Dear Cindy, I don't know what you're talking about, but mr Springsteen made us (in Europe, you know what Europe is?
believe there is a better america than that big arrogant machine which is brought to us by the news. He showed us the soul and spirit, and made us understand your patriotism. You go ahead and puke, puke all over yourself, cause that is what you're already doing right now. Springsteen does not think he represents everyone in America, I know he is not representing you.
Hey Jake, I would suggest researching a poster before you decide to bash them. I am American, and proud. However, I have spent a lot of time in Europe and certainly do not appreciate your assumption that I have no idea what is going on outside my little corner.
As for Mr. Springsteen, I stand by my earlier assessment. When he first started, he was not a wealthy man, he just played great rock songs about normal things. Then Born in the USA comes out, and he is thrust into the role of the American Everyman. Suddenly all his songs have a deeper meaning as he acts as if he is the voice of the working class.
He becomes a rich man singing about the poor man. Why wasn't he doing that when he was a poor man? It feels hypocritical somehow. If he was poor and sang about being poor, I would have bought it.
Aside from all that you mention in another post to Elmo "Nebraska bores you when you don't listen to lyrics, I suppose there's no value for you in lyrics"
Well, I like good lyrics, but the music has to hold me too. And from what I've heard of the post Born stuff (beginning with Philadelphia) the music is a complete snooze IMO. Therefore, I am not going to waste my time listening to bad music just to hear good lyrics. If I'm looking for something meaningful, I'll read a book.
You keep speaking about being young, and you fancy yourself to be wise beyond your years. When you finally grow up, you will learn that it is not necessary to treat another as an idiot to make your point.