ever liked keith---But Jagger doing their business. a bigger bang---another jagger-album

In debate mood tonite, good Havo? Well; I wont bite.
Just a short, dry comment:
Without Keith Mick would have been just another stock market dude. ;0)

Two words: Primitive Cool

There, I won that debate.

Yup - Sir Michael has always been T h e Rocker.
The other dude is just a hanger-on & a wannabee. Good nite! :O)

BRAVO! Without Mick, no Stones and Keith would have been a grave digger like Rod Stewart was in the early days!

Can we stop soon?

yeah lets...........and lets all just chew on the following.........

Satisfaction from Jumpin' Jack Flash
Cameron Adams, music writer
14apr06

ANYONE who has picked up a guitar since the mid-'60s owes a debt to the Rolling Stones.

In the one band you have the consummate rock frontman and the consummate rock star, who have each spawned countless imitators.
Mick Jagger and Keith Richards have single-handedly written the how to, and the what not to do, bibles for rock 'n' roll.

...............and that's all I gotta say.............

Rip This Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> yeah lets...........and lets all just chew on the
> following.........
>
> Satisfaction from Jumpin' Jack Flash
> Cameron Adams, music writer
> 14apr06
>
> ANYONE who has picked up a guitar since the
> mid-'60s owes a debt to the Rolling Stones.
>
> In the one band you have the consummate rock
> frontman and the consummate rock star, who have
> each spawned countless imitators.
> Mick Jagger and Keith Richards have
> single-handedly written the how to, and the what
> not to do, bibles for rock 'n' roll.
>
> ...............and that's all I gotta
> say.............

id say anyone whos gone on a stage with a rock and roll band,

Baboon Bro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Can we stop soon?


You're losing your patience quite soon these days, aren't you, Baboon? You used to be more relaxed. Did the "negativity" finally get to you?

Kieth,can strum that thing, awsome, always been my fav...charlie is the coolest...human metronome......ron....what does he do(kidding)
Mick has been and always will be the leader...this tour even more so ...i think he is better this time then licks...4 sure.....he must be on roids.....................

Rip This Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> yeah lets...........and lets all just chew on the
> following.........
>
> Satisfaction from Jumpin' Jack Flash
> Cameron Adams, music writer
> 14apr06
>
> ANYONE who has picked up a guitar since the
> mid-'60s owes a debt to the Rolling Stones.
>
> In the one band you have the consummate rock
> frontman and the consummate rock star, who have
> each spawned countless imitators.
> Mick Jagger and Keith Richards have
> single-handedly written the how to, and the what
> not to do, bibles for rock 'n' roll.
>
> ...............and that's all I gotta
> say.............


great quote...why do we have to choose between them? The Stones = The Glimmer Twins = Jagger/Richards...of course Charlie has been an essential ingredient too...all else has been icing on the cake at a particular time. That said, Mick takes way too much heat for the business side of things, while Keith has benefitted just as much. Jagger has greater depth than given credit for by some and of course much of that is Keith's influence. Love em all!!!

Baboon Bro Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In debate mood tonite, good Havo? Well; I wont
> bite.
> Just a short, dry comment:
> Without Keith Mick would have been just another
> stock market dude. ;0)


Without Brian Jones, Keith would be in jail or dead and Mick would be a filthy rich financier!

neptune Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Baboon Bro Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > In debate mood tonite, good Havo? Well; I wont
> > bite.
> > Just a short, dry comment:
> > Without Keith Mick would have been just another
> > stock market dude. ;0)
>
>
> Without Brian Jones, Keith would be in jail or
> dead and Mick would be a filthy rich financier!


without Mick and Keith, Brian Jones would have been found drowned in a pool somewhere!

mick is filth these days..It's always really been Keef and Charlie, right? That's your RandB right there..

mr edward Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Baboon Bro Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Can we stop soon?
>
>
> You're losing your patience quite soon these days,
> aren't you, Baboon? You used to be more relaxed.
> Did the "negativity" finally get to you?

Bad body hair day yesterday. :0D

Also think it's pretty useless type debates;
always & always started by some Jagger freak.

The Stones would be shit without Mick, Keith, Ron or Charliel. They basically suck but when they come together chemistry happens and they're the greatest rock 'n' roll band.

Your theory blows.

Without the Rollers the Stones would gather moss!

Been Stoned since 1964 and still am!

to baboon bro who said,always started by some jagger freak?can,t you read?every time iim in this forum it,s always jaggerbashing,have you ever read this?
why don,t some of you start a keith richardforum and go there with your high prices of keith richards

the Rolling Stones ARE Mick Jagger in these days.
I really like Keith---but the boss of the band is mick,

Keith is of course an important part of the Stones, but I wish he would try a little harder these days (write more songs and not let Chuck run the live band).

agree--ohnonotyouagain

Posting such a dumb-looking comment without any argumentation is kind of silly, by the way. Well, silly, it's just dumb.

the stones are charlie

the stones are bill

The Stones are the Stones plus the tons of back-up musicians on stage.

it's clear this is Blondie Chaplin's band these daze....