You can have any opinion you want but,it is a fact that it is perfunctory.

.....perhaps it is.........and that may explain partially why the band's music doesn't get the respect today that it once received

Rip This Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I'm glad I could do some good today T&A.....for me
> YGMR sounds like something that a cheesy band like
> Bon Jovi would write.........it just cheapens the
> Stones catalogue..........from my perspective
> anyway

No!!!that boy from New yersey would never ever wrote this!!!He has wet dreams..of it feeling bad guess I lost my spring..I was the boxer....he woulnt and you know it!

i'm beginning to weep tears of joy uncontrollably....MAKEUP!

This song makes you cry!!!T&A thats good!

hey hey, you got me crying now.

I guess SOMEONE must like it????

Please remove from setlist along with LARS which hopefully we NEVER hear again....

Love it!!

If you cant rock me!!!I bet you like that one moreT&A!!

yes - but quit trying to kiss and makeup. you're in the doghouse (and that ain't a good place for a rooster)

T&A Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> yes - but quit trying to kiss and makeup. you're
> in the doghouse (and that ain't a good place for a
> rooster)

You know T&A eastern is Roosters Time!!!!

I Go Wild is like another You Got Me Rocking to me. I understand whey they play it live though, it isn't difficult to execute live, and it gets the crowd going in stadiums. But for me as a fan it is getting boring to hear it live.
If they only play it like 1 out of 10 shows than it is okay and would be more or less fresh.
Would be nice to hear them play another mid tempo rocker as the third or fourth song, choice enough.
Like Short And Curlies, etc.

Rip This Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> .....perhaps it is.........and that may explain
> partially why the band's music doesn't get the
> respect today that it once received


Well,all of the recent material is not like that.In my opinion,I Go Wild is far superior to You Got Me Rocking & it seemed to work well live.

in fact I Go Live was the centerpiece song of the VL tour...a tour-de-force

I dont really like I go wild.

rooster Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I dont really like I go wild.


Not me either.

T&A Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> in fact I Go Live was the centerpiece song of the
> VL tour...a tour-de-force

It was the most boring song of the VL tour...the fact that the gang ...came forwards with the guitars was a nice gimmick thought.

i'm not sure I can work with you guys anymore - Erik - don't you have a reindeer to attend to or something?

you dont have to work!!!!But I go Wild Pfffff give me a break!!

-T&A, you make very good points when you critesize something.
But it seems that the Rolling STones have fooled you to like I Go Wild. So you're not perfect in "good taste".
I Go Wild is just a lot of words, meaning nothing in particular, just rhyming. And the groove is so dull, and the I GO WILD repetition, makes you think that Jagger views his audience as 2nd-hand sheeps.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2006-04-11 00:14 by Erik_Snow.

T&A Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> in fact I Go Live was the centerpiece song of the
> VL tour...a tour-de-force

I Go Live? is that a medley of I Go Wild and Live with Me?

alright rooster - back in your cage now

ITs Spring time T&A Rooster is wild!!!

so was that you that woke me up this morning with your mating call?

Rooster Go Wild - now yer getting the hang of it!

...and the snow is melting.

T&A Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Rooster Go Wild - now yer getting the hang of it!


I go rocking me self.

shite, rooster's off his leash again

I really like You Got Me Rocking, but like some others here, think it's getting a little tired now. The studio version is still great, but I think live versions have been a little lacking of late. What surprises me the most is its inclusion in the first place. It wasn’t a hit; your average Joe on the street wouldn’t know it, yet the Stones play it constantly. I'd rather they fitted one of their many non-performed 60's top-ten hits instead.

Jumpinjackgreg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I like it. I don't sigh when I hear it live,
> unlike when I hear Honky Tonk Women, Happy and
> Miss You. It's a good song. I love the version off
> the London concert on Four Flicks.

J-J-Flash Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
Let me get this straight, you like it more than the songs you mention or would rather hear this live than those???

I think the song sucks live. It seems that its just an easy sing-along kind of song where Mick can rely on backing singers and not have to give much effort. Doesn't help that they play a song like this at almost every show. There are so many better songs this can be replaced with.





well...yeah, i honestly do. When I hear the opening notes of HTW i just cringe b/c I think it's fairly boring song. But of course if the Stones are going to play Under My Thumb, Saint Of Me, or another new song of course I'm more than willing to sacrifice YGMR. And I agree with other posters that it's not my favorite off of VL, but it's not my least either. I still love Love is Strong and I was extremely happy to hear it in Chicago in January. One of my highlights of the 2 shows I've seen this tour. I liked it even more than when I was there in Columbus for the first time they ever played Sway.