stickydion Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> MicksBrain, i appreciate your political opinions
> (atleast some of them), but i am very tired of
> this nostalgic idealization about the Stones of
> 70s. I mean the second half of 70s...
>
> Of course the band was always great and still is.
> They had it, they have it. But:
>
> (A) IMO Love You Live is the weakest Stones live
> album. With a lot of mediocre versions (and what a
> nervelless Tumbling Dice!). Do you think Mick was
> in his prime then? I don't. He very often was
> singing completely out of tune (SFTD), or being
> embarrassed (YCAGWYW), or just "munching" (HTW,
> JJF, etc). Ronnie was the strong point of the
> band, but not always as marvellous as many fans
> are saying. For example: I find his solo on
> YCAGWYW just childish. Some consider it as a
> classic solo. Matter of taste.
>
> (
IMO Keith very often was "almost dead" in 1976
> (a lot of drugs, i suppose). Remember him in
> Knebowrth. Ronnie saved a gig for 200,000 people.
>
>
> (C) Sorry, but to me the weakest Stones tour ever
> was 1978 round. Not bad, of course, but the
> weakest. I don't appreciate so much this "punky
> spirit" that was prompting their performances to
> be unstable, frivolous and full of mistakes. Much
> more mistakes than they do since 1989! During
> 1978, if their peak on stage made "Handsome
> Girls", their weak moments made "Out On Bail".
> Almost bad, to me.
>
>
> (D) With respect, but a good or bad setlist is
> matter of taste and of personal preference. But a
> list that remains the same every night, during a
> tour, is fact. Not opinion.
Oh no no no!!!!How can you say this!!!Pfffff.