setlists etc
Date: January 26, 2006 16:26
When a theatre company tours, do you expect them to change the script every evening in order to diversify the show? No. Same with a revue. I think it's absurd to expect the Stones to do different setlists everynight. They have set their "2005-2006 review" and that's it. It's already quite something that they modify it when playing many times in one city, which they don't HAVE to do; you guys bought many tickets to the same event, shall mean that you feel happy with seeing it twice.
Now it is true that the way tunes are played is very similar since 1997 or so, even 1989 for some of them. That's another thing. It's a bit like a musical that is shown again for years and years, fundamentally unchanged. Now I don't have a problem with that either.
I like to go back to Rome every so many years and see these great sites again, while surely they have not changed. What's the big deal with seeing the same thing twice if that thing's great?
The problem only occurs for those who have bootlegs of every shows and are frutrated of having acquired 25 times the same record. Well if you had 25 DVDs of one Hamlet rendition by one troup they'd also be fairly similar - it's only that you did the wrong move.
Go see the 2005 Stones, and see them as many times as you want, knowing that you're the one deciding to go see the SAME show TWICE, with minor changes and the time and place difference. It's absurd to expect any more differences. The Stones have put up ONE touring act, not a zillion different local acts.