BersaGurra, i was wondering the same thing - then i thought maybe the implication is that the family might be in a position to bring a civil suit for wrongful death against a perpetrator, if there is one and if s/he or his/her heirs have any money.
i'm also puzzled by a few other things - why anyone would think a group of professionals at the Stones' level at that point would leave something like the question of the rights to the band's name up in the air (i would imagine that question was spelled out legally years before Brian left); and why three people would hold anyone's head under water if that person had been drugged or killed inside the house.
... sigh. love & light to Brian.
"What do you want - what?!"
- Keith
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2005-11-17 21:34 by with sssoul.