For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
jumpontopofmebaby
So. I have to ask. 19 songs ?
Quote
Green Lady
Quote
StonedAsiaExileQuote
Green Lady
Appears the twins have added their own signatures.
Quote
MisterDDDDQuote
StonedAsiaExileQuote
Green Lady
Appears the twins have added their own signatures.
Live action footage of it's creation
[twitter.com]
Quote
TornAndFried
Down to 19 songs. Would it kill them to add a third acoustic song on the small stage? That acoustic set is already too short and it's placement in the show feels odd.
Quote
caschimannQuote
TornAndFried
Down to 19 songs. Would it kill them to add a third acoustic song on the small stage? That acoustic set is already too short and it's placement in the show feels odd.
Would it kill them?
Would it kill you to get from 75+ men ONE song less?
Which means for them to save energy.
How old are you?
May be 75 and still performing 2.15 hours live on stage twice a week.
If yes you have all my respect.
Quote
MacLaurens
So Brown Sugar got a new place in the setlist.
True, but his musicians are not in the mid seventies.Quote
TornAndFriedQuote
caschimannQuote
TornAndFried
Down to 19 songs. Would it kill them to add a third acoustic song on the small stage? That acoustic set is already too short and it's placement in the show feels odd.
Would it kill them?
Would it kill you to get from 75+ men ONE song less?
Which means for them to save energy.
How old are you?
May be 75 and still performing 2.15 hours live on stage twice a week.
If yes you have all my respect.
Paul McCartney is older than both Mick and Keith and granted he doesn't run around the stage but he plays a nearly 3 hour show with over 30 songs. The Stones take 3 to 5 days off between shows these days. I'm pretty sure they have the energy to play another song or two. Especially if they do an acoustic ballad.
Quote
caschimannQuote
TornAndFried
Down to 19 songs. Would it kill them to add a third acoustic song on the small stage? That acoustic set is already too short and it's placement in the show feels odd.
Would it kill them?
Would it kill you to get from 75+ men ONE song less?
Which means for them to save energy.
How old are you?
May be 75 and still performing 2.15 hours live on stage twice a week.
If yes you have all my respect.
Quote
mtaylorTrue, but his musicians are not in the mid seventies.Quote
TornAndFriedQuote
caschimannQuote
TornAndFried
Down to 19 songs. Would it kill them to add a third acoustic song on the small stage? That acoustic set is already too short and it's placement in the show feels odd.
Would it kill them?
Would it kill you to get from 75+ men ONE song less?
Which means for them to save energy.
How old are you?
May be 75 and still performing 2.15 hours live on stage twice a week.
If yes you have all my respect.
Paul McCartney is older than both Mick and Keith and granted he doesn't run around the stage but he plays a nearly 3 hour show with over 30 songs. The Stones take 3 to 5 days off between shows these days. I'm pretty sure they have the energy to play another song or two. Especially if they do an acoustic ballad.
The drummer is around 50 y.o.